Sho_Nuff82
Member
Better Call Saul was absolutely fantastic this year. Some of the best TV I've ever seen, and this is with the expectation of being a Breaking Bad spinoff.
It's still worth watching, and only two seasons--not a big time commitment.Now you've got me interested in watching Rome.
Im confused isnt roots a really old show? I remember my mom having the entire series on DVD years ago when I was a kid.
Im confused isnt roots a really old show? I remember my mom having the entire series on DVD years ago when I was a kid.
Game of Thrones is so far ahead of everything else that is on TV that I have to laugh at the naysayers.
Episode 9 and 10 of this season makes your favorite TV show looks like amateur hour.
Those last two episodes have been really enjoyable, but no. Maybe in terms of production values but in writing...just no.
Pretty weak year so far overall, I think.
Also, the lack of Black Sails on this list is an appalling affront to great TV. It may very well be the best show on TV. It's definitely the best show that apparently no one (other than my good friend Trejo) is watching.
I have no clue how someone can look at GoT's writing and say it's up to Better Call Saul's caliber.
Have you watched it at all?I'll never understand the peerless praise for Better Call Saul. I guess being the "B-" version of the greatest show of all time is good enough.
When you come out the gate shitting on people's tastes that don't align with your own, who needs to watch it?Have you watched it at all?
I guess.Is it hipster to hate on GoT now?
no love for scream, fuck outta here.
best hidden gem of 2016
Yes, both seasons.Have you watched it at all?
Yes, both seasons.
Like I said, it's a not as good Breaking Bad.
Don't worry. Come award season everyone will be back to guzzling HBO and forgetting that FX even exists.This person hates HBO
Silicon Valley, Veep and GOT are all better than most of that list - and Kimmy Schmidt had a pretty lackluster S2.
It basically IS Rome, with a grounded fantasy setting instead of a historical one, a focus on lots of main characters instead of two, a bigger budget, and more than two seasons. George R. R. Martin was convinced a Game of Thrones TV series could work in the first place because of how well HBO handled Rome, and wanted a show in roughly the same style. I'd honestly be surprised at anyone who loved one show but not the other.
Has thrones reached that point where it's cool to shit on it?
Game of Thrones is so far ahead of everything else that is on TV that I have to laugh at the naysayers.
Episode 9 and 10 of this season makes your favorite TV show looks like amateur hour.
Game of Thrones is so far ahead of everything else that is on TV that I have to laugh at the naysayers.
Episode 9 and 10 of this season makes your favorite TV show looks like amateur hour.
I totally understand not being grabbed by the setting at first. It's ridiculously well-developed, but if you haven't read the books, it takes time to absorb and appreciate.Yeah I kinda got that.
I guess I'm just not as into its setting as I am with Rome. I'm fascinated with ancient history and GoT simply hasn't been able to grab me in that way.
I didn't find myself caring about the locations or many of its characters and it doesn't help that a handful of said characters are portrayed some pretty lousy actors like Kit Harington and Emilia Clarke.
I shouldn't knock the show on that last bit too hard though as I'm usually pretty forgiving when it comes to acting... I don't know what it is about GoT that makes me as critical as I am about it but I can't help it.
I really want to like it. but eh ¯\_(ツ_/¯
I totally understand not being grabbed by the setting at first. It's ridiculously well-developed, but if you haven't read the books, it takes time to absorb and appreciate.
Harrington and Clarke are weak links in the cast, no doubt. That said, they do improve a bit over time, and the secondary characters are often supremely well-cast and well-acted (including a decent number of Rome alumni...watch for Caesar and Brutus in later seasons).
I'd recommend giving the show a couple more seasons. I started with the books back in 2001, and found them just decent at first, then turned into a raving megafan once things clicked for me. The same thing might happen for you with the show.
Oh, I thought you only watched a season for some reason. Yeah, then you should probably drop the show. Maybe read the books instead--they feel a lot more historical and give everything a lot more time and detail.Yeah seeing them was cool. I actually stopped shortly after CaesarThat was season 4 I think?died
I've definitely given the show a chance. At this point I feel like I should just accept the fact that it's ok for me not to like a thing even when everything about it makes it sound like I should like it... Maybe I'll pick it up again when I have nothing else to watch.
you dont get it dude
Game of Thrones is popular now, its not cool to think its the best anymore.
Yeah I kinda got that.
I guess I'm just not as into its setting as I am with Rome. I'm fascinated with ancient history and GoT simply hasn't been able to grab me in that way.
I didn't find myself caring about the locations or many of its characters and it doesn't help that a handful of said characters are portrayed some pretty lousy actors like Kit Harington and Emilia Clarke.
I shouldn't knock the show on that last bit too hard though as I'm usually pretty forgiving when it comes to acting... I don't know what it is about GoT that makes me as critical as I am about it but I can't help it.
I really want to like it. but eh ¯\_(ツ_/¯
No GoT S6 ? WTF Really ? That was the best season of the entire series
Game of Thrones is so far ahead of everything else that is on TV that I have to laugh at the naysayers.
Episode 9 and 10 of this season makes your favorite TV show looks like amateur hour.
In the past year, the best miniseries and anthologies alone — The Girlfriend Experience, Horace and Pete, Fargo, The Night Manager, American Crime, and The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story — were all pantheon-worthy, but they were disqualified from consideration here because this contest is for ongoing series with continuing story lines, which requires a more ambitious sort of long-form storytelling.
The ongoing series that I considered a head above the rest include Veep, Bob’s Burgers, You’re the Worst, Black-ish, Silicon Valley, UnREAL, Rectify, The Leftovers, Outlander, Orange Is the New Black, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, Jessica Jones, Transparent, Better Call Saul, Bojack Horseman, and The Americans. But if I were to nominate only five, the ones that impressed me the most were Better Call Saul, The Americans, The Leftovers, Orange Is the New Black, and BoJack Horseman. I fixate on them because of their consistent excellence in every department, their ability to shift between wildly different modes with improbable grace, and their constant sense of surprise. Even when you feel as if you’ve gotten to know these series as well as you know a good friend, they throw you curveballs, not just from week to week but from scene to scene.
Better Call Saul, to name just one of my favorites, is an exquisitely crafted, highly atmospheric character study that dares to slow things down and give you time to really live inside of a moment, and it boasts an assortment of major and minor characters that both Preston Sturges and Elmore Leonard might have envied. Crazy Ex-Girlfriend’s grasp of psychology is comparably sophisticated, and I’d put its ensemble (as both characters and an acting troupe) against Saul’s, fully confident of an even matchup. But I give Crazy Ex-Girlfriend the edge because it explores its characters’ psychology and their world in a way you almost never see, alternating between satirical, sitcomlike interactions and original musical numbers that are not realistic, nor simply dreamlike, but expressionistic. There are many precedents on American TV for the likes of Better Call Saul, great as it is; there has never been anything like Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, and in my mind, singularity beats refinement of an existing template, no matter how clever and assured that refinement may be.
I keep coming back to the originality of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend as I match it against my other favorites. It does everything, or plausibly could do everything, that most other great shows do, and it also does things it would never occur to them to do, things that are rarely attempted in live-action because audiences insist on consistency of tone. This is why, for instance, I choose it over BoJack Horseman, an extraordinary series that, like CXG, invests sitcomlike situations with a mournful unease. BoJack’s visuals and situations are at once absurd and astonishing — there is a long tradition of this in so-called adult animation, and you can see family-friendly traces of it on Bob’s Burgers, too. But CXG achieves similarly eye-popping, heart-stirring effects in live action, where its performances make it more revelatory.
This is the same Kimmy Schmidt with the "minorities get mad over nothing" plotline and Tina Fey saying her jokes are too smart for people who criticise her show?
I agree with this assessment. More of you need to watch Crazy Ex-Girlfriend.
Shame