Requiring doctors to provide healthcare and requiring insurers to provide coverage at an affordable price seems to be... I dunno. Not quite slavery.DirtRiver said:So for example, you have a right for the pursuit of healthcare (note the 'pursuit', which is an action) but not a right for healthcare because it implies that no matter what the context is, you have a right for someone's else service for which that someone else can't object too, i.e, you have a right to force someone else to do something for you, which is a violation of that someone else's right to life (and was also called slavery not too long ago).
If you're going to put it that way, then I actually do think that those in our society have the right to doctors' services, since we wouldn't even have doctors if we didn't have a well-functioning society.
We're all interdependent.