The reaction from authorities really isn't interesting or comparable to other situations where race was an issue, but what is interesting is the reaction from the American people and how that's affected by the color of the perpetrators.
You can't deny policy would be different.
There is nothing casual about the response. The FBI and other organizations are involved, they aren't sitting around doing nothing. Based on past similar cases, their primary goal is to avoid a shootout/bloodshed. And barring some change in the militias behavior - for instance if they start attacking citizens or something - I'd expect the feds to continue what they're doing to diffuse things.
News said they had generators and stuff. Looks like they're looking forward to a lengthy siege.
Get some snipers out there to put a few rounds in those generators then let them "enjoy" a few nights of Oregon winter and they'll get out right quick.
Agreed. And the media reaction or lack thereof. Bundy's group pulled a similar stunt last year. They didn't take over a federal building but they refused to leave territory that they claimed was "illegally seized" by the government. They were heavily armed and even set up snipers on a bridge. Needless the say the feds avoided a shootout.
And why can't the police just show up and tell them to leave or be arrested? Are they really sure these people will shoot up cops?
they've specifically said that they're looking for a fight. they would take any move like that as aggression justifying an armed response.
basically they know the history of the federal skittishness post-waco as well as the fed themselves and are playing it to the hilt.
It's also the BLM. The BLM doesn't really have any force to show. 300 armed rangers and agents and that's it.
Insane.
All this over some guys who set fires on federal land. And apparently don't want their help.
GTFO of my state.
So has anything happened yet?
That'll be their death warrant not diffusion.
I keep being told I should but it's such a high castle.
lol, according to their dear leader, their whole intention is to turn a wild life refuge into a logging business and a place where they can tear up the land in their RV's. Yeah, no thanks.
i'm pretty sure the FBI would handle this, maybe ATF if they think there's firearms violations taking place
My issue with the response so far is that it isn't clear that the FBI have done much of anything, including stopping new people from arriving. These guys have put out multiple calls to arms, and there has been a response, so at a minimum there should be agents blockading the roads to and from the refuge center, to stop more people and more guns from arriving.
But that doesn't seem to be happening as far as I can tell.
Yeah. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/01/03/militia-members-occupy-us-building-in-oregon-after-protest/78226600/They have kids there?
Maureen Peltier, a Washington Army National Guard staff sergeant and member of the so-called patriot movement, toldThe Oregonian that some in the group were armed and others were not. Peltier wrote on Facebook that the group had brought children into the refuge.
Until you blockade the location, there's nothing stopping them from bringing in what they need. Frankly it's going to be pretty difficult anyway, since the property abuts 187,000 acres of wilderness.Their probably just going to wait them out a few days, until they're sick of the lack of amenities and comfort
Children being present is a huge distinction.
Pretty sure Islamic extremists wouldn't bring children in these cases.
I'm talking little kids that were brought along. Not teenagers there under their own volition.Huh? I know they have people at least as young as 16 fighting for their cause, i'm sure younger.
I'm talking little kids that were brought along. Not teenagers there under their own volition.
America is probably a safre country if they stay in that building for years. I say keep them there. It's a win-win
you do have a point. I'm revising my mental picture of the ideal outcome to building a giant Chernobyl-style containment vessel over the whole site, in the form of a massive concrete statue of Teddy Roosevelt taking a dump
Yeah, we've seen these kinds of dudes online before. They can't last long without wifi.Theyre probably just going to wait them out a few days, until they're sick of the lack of amenities and comfort
Huh? I know they have people at least as young as 16 fighting for their cause, i'm sure younger.
TerrorismPeople calling them terrorists, but who are they terrorizing, exactly?
They're in a federal building in the middle of nowhere that had zero employees on site, so clearly civilian causalities are something they didn't want on their hands.
Obviously, this isn't exactly the correct way to handle this, but it's a bit of a stretch to call them terrorists.
People calling them terrorists, but who are they terrorizing, exactly?
They're in a federal building in the middle of nowhere that had zero employees on site, so clearly civilian causalities are something they didn't want on their hands.
Obviously, this isn't exactly the correct way to handle this, but it's a bit of a stretch to call them terrorists.
Armed insurgents invading and taking over a location, spouting their ideals and propaganda and threatening violence if they do not get what they want and if there is an attempt to remove them.
Sounds kind of text book to me.
I am pretty damn sure some people in the surrounding area does not want either in town, especially the militia.^^^ the only people looking intimidated are the feds..
I am pretty damn sure some people in the surrounding area does not want either in town, especially the militia.