Dolomite
Member
Y'all kill me the "If I can't fap to her I'm not playing"mentalityIf this really is what our protagonist looks like, I'm getting this on gamepass and will just repeatedly throw her off of a cliff.
![]()

Y'all kill me the "If I can't fap to her I'm not playing"mentalityIf this really is what our protagonist looks like, I'm getting this on gamepass and will just repeatedly throw her off of a cliff.
![]()
They won’t eat it. They’ll refuse or move goalpostsCan't wait for the crow.
Playground are top tier.
Have you played a fable game beforeBut what kind of game is it? Is it Fable or Hogwarts?
Because the settings is in medivial.The character in the video is OBJECTIVELY hideous, actively unpleasant to look at. It’s rare to see people that ugly even in real life. Just because I don’t want to look at a hideous MC doesn’t mean I need to jerk off to my character 24/7. We aren’t all mindless coomers, just people with eyes.
I don’t see why characters can’t be attractive. Attractive people exist in real life. You can go outside and walk around and find people who look attractive. It’s not some weird thing. It’s not even rare.
I assumed that you could create your own character? Either way, not the best character for PR. Typical western devs, they’re all walking the same boring path.If this really is what our protagonist looks like, I'm getting this on gamepass and will just repeatedly throw her off of a cliff.
![]()
Everyone in that picture is better looking than the MC that PG chose to show off Fable in. And I mean, there are a lot of people who descended from those who lived in medieval Europe and they’re better looking.Because the settings is in medivial.
The character isn't a hot knight who doesn't get dirty. This is an accurate representation of medivial times.
![]()
Only rich people were hygiene enough to be pretty.
Fable has a character creator.This is my point this company (and others) are making characters that are unnaturally and unrealistically ugly/misshapen/weird in a way that actually does not reflect reality. There is something between “sexpot” and “hideous troll from the depths” that the studios are missing. Like if you don’t want to make a sexpot just make a normal person.
Hey trolls, if you're going to go out of your way to troll Starfield (clearly the most ambitious game in years) being 30fps in a Fable thread, at least include the 4K part.
(But then again, why would trolls care about creators not willing to sacrifice the fidelity of an incomparable amount of new assets they spent the time and money creating?)
Anyway..
Playground is killing shit out here.
PS trolls who can't take an Xbox game looks so good. Who gives a shit what a playable character looks like in Fable. In Fable you'll see their ass far more than their face and also they change with the gamePS Trolls? Aloy's model got shat on too after the first gameplay demo... horny gamers transcend platform wars.
She is an adventurer.Everyone in that picture is better looking than the MC that PG chose to show off Fable in. And I mean, there are a lot of people who descended from those who lived in medieval Europe and they’re better looking.
This is my point this company (and others) are making characters that are unnaturally and unrealistically ugly/misshapen/weird in a way that actually does not reflect reality. There is something between “sexpot” and “hideous troll from the depths” that the studios are missing. Like if you don’t want to make a sexpot just make a normal person.
The character was straight up ugly. It looked like a man’s face with long hair.Oh fun, we've already got the "characters aren't bangable enough" conversations going.
. . .also, the trailer was clearly impressive and if the actual beat to beat gameplay has that level of fidelity then FABLE is absolutely going to be a great game. However people don't want to see heavily curated machinimas (even if they are running in-engine and not a CGI movie), they want a mix of both to showcase what the game will actually look like in practice.
Like the art style is giving me major HWL vibes, just with the fidelity turned up even more (and as boring as that game was it does look really quite good), so we know this isn't impossible to pull off, but it would still be nice to confirm that the fluidity in these cutscenes is just as present in the regular gameplay.
I said my piece I don’t want to go on but the guy still looks like himself and a normal person, just older, rugged, and worn out (which is attractive in its own way, notwithstanding the hell he went through). Unless PG wanted to show off that their character creator could create characters that outdo inhuman Oblivion monstrosities I don’t know why they went this way.She is an adventurer.
You age badly the more time you spend on combat area.
![]()
This is a soldier from WW2 face.
The stress of combat and adventure messes up your body and face.
It's time games stay faithful to these faces, instead of pretty faces.
A game can look great, until you pan the camera. This game has first person shooter gameplay which is terrible in 30fps. Then there is VRR- does it go that low on Xbox?Hey trolls, if you're going to go out of your way to troll Starfield (clearly the most ambitious game in years) being 30fps in a Fable thread, at least include the 4K part.
(But then again, why would trolls care about creators not willing to sacrifice the fidelity of an incomparable amount of new assets they spent the time and money creating?)
Anyway..
Playground is killing shit out here.
So you are admitting to being a troll.A game can look great, until you pan the camera. This game has first person shooter gameplay which is terrible in 30fps. Then there is VRR- does it go that low on Xbox?
And let’s be real, I highly doubt anything besides a high end PC GPU will push this to 4k if it’s as ambitious as you think.
In my experience. It’s single lonely men that have a problem with this. People with good looking wives or girlfriends don’t give a fuck about what a character looks like in a game they’re playing. It’s lonely virgin gamers that want to fantasize being with every character they playing as. It’s weird as fuck.The character in the video is OBJECTIVELY hideous, actively unpleasant to look at. It’s rare to see people that ugly even in real life. Just because I don’t want to look at a hideous MC doesn’t mean I need to jerk off to my character 24/7. We aren’t all mindless coomers, just people with eyes.
I don’t see why characters can’t be attractive. Attractive people exist in real life. You can go outside and walk around and find people who look attractive. It’s not some weird thing. It’s not even rare.
It's because that kind of face is real.I said my piece I don’t want to go on but the guy still looks like himself and a normal person, just older, rugged, and worn out (which is attractive in its own way, notwithstanding the hell he went through). Unless PG wanted to show off that their character creator could create characters that outdo inhuman Oblivion monstrosities I don’t know why they went this way.
Aloy looks like a model compared to this “thing”.Aloy is a fucking supermodel confirmed.
I’m not a PlayStation troll. The character looks terrible.PS trolls who can't take an Xbox game looks so good. Who gives a shit what a playable character looks like in Fable. In Fable you'll see their ass far more than their face and also they change with the game
A nice throwback. Those were the days...Fable in a nutshell
![]()
YOUR DAD LOOKS LIKE A MAN!!!!Looks like a man.
I assumed that too. But do we know this for sure? Maybe they’re just going with man or wom…err I meant body type A or B!Fable has a character creator.
I’m saying that 60fps is objectively a better experience than 30fps.So you are admitting to being a troll.
Y'all kill me the "If I can't fap to her I'm not playing"mentality
![]()
Fable is running on the new Forzatech 2.0 engine which has been built from the ground up to take advantage of the XSX and DX12U extensions.
That means mesh shaders, Sampler Feedback Streaming and XVA.
The fact that so many people are crying "CGI", even after it was confirmed to be in game on a XSX, tells you just how stunning it looks.
Meth addiction: Before and after.
![]()
The character in the video is OBJECTIVELY hideous, actively unpleasant to look at. It’s rare to see people that ugly even in real life. Just because I don’t want to look at a hideous MC doesn’t mean I need to jerk off to my character 24/7. We aren’t all mindless coomers, just people with eyes.
I don’t see why characters can’t be attractive. Attractive people exist in real life. You can go outside and walk around and find people who look attractive. It’s not some weird thing. It’s not even rare.
When did Fable become realistic?Because the settings is in medivial.
The character isn't a hot knight who doesn't get dirty. This is an accurate representation of medivial times.
![]()
Only rich people were hygiene enough to be pretty.
When people started to cry about how characters look.When did Fable become realistic?
Very reasonable responseThis is quite unpleasant really. I hope your views on what is painful to look at don't reach the ears of someone who'd be upset by it. I'm not trying to appear holier than anyone, and I've definitely said hurtful things before that I regret, but if nobody tells you that what you're saying is horrible, then you might never realise.
Ok, JimI’m not a PlayStation troll. The character looks terrible.
Crossed fists and crossed hands, what does that mean?!
![]()
Also because the chick looks like she hasn't washed herself in a month or so.When people complained about blackwashing redheads in games and movies, I doubt this was the solution they were hoping for.
It looks "next gen". Kudos to Microsoft for pushing gaming visuals forward.
Halo Infinite reveal and second reveal were also in game and then they showed that gameplay everyone remembers.
Let’s wait for actual gameplay, this goes for pretty much any game from any company.
Clearly neither do given all computer graphics are CGINah. Fable was in-game, on a XSX. Killzone 2 reveal was done on a workstation and was done before they even saw a PS3 dev kit.
You obviously don't know what CGI means.
Anyone who knows me knows I prefer Xbox. Look at my posting history.Ok, Jim
Not a single commoner looked like this person.Meth increases your weight instead of decreasing? Well that's going to make a lot of future meth users happy to hear.
. . .stuff is wild; like despite not really showing much, the FABLE trailer did show that the series is sticking to its weird British roots, is still funny and is still trying to innovate in terms of art aesthetic and fidelity - a true next generation version of a previous (two previouses ago) generation game and the best we can do is meme that a player character (who I'm sure you can customize) who is a commoner in this Ye Olde English game looks. . .like a commoner. Bleagh.
Huh, I don't think this pictures conveys the message you want it to.Because the settings is in medivial.
The character isn't a hot knight who doesn't get dirty. This is an accurate representation of medivial times.
![]()
Only rich people were hygiene enough to be pretty.
Own a PC and the discussion is moot.Can’t wait for another 30fps “artistic choice” game.
I do own one- a 7900xt one at that.Own a PC and the discussion is moot.
Sorry for the laugh emoji earlier, thought I should ask you something and I’ll ignore the teenage talk if that’s okay.In my experience. It’s single lonely men that have a problem with this. People with good looking wives or girlfriends don’t give a fuck about what a character looks like in a game they’re playing. It’s lonely virgin gamers that want to fantasize being with every character they playing as. It’s weird as fuck.
Its a reminder to people that normal we have here didnt exist back then, due to low hygiene.Huh, I don't think this pictures conveys the message you want it to.
The character was straight up ugly. It looked like a man’s face with long hair.