The Giant
Banned
Here's the Nintendogs 40/40 thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45026&highlight=nintendogs+famitsu
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45026&highlight=nintendogs+famitsu
Nintendo spending that money
I don't particularly trust in famitsu reviews and scores but so far every thread about good zelda botw reviews has been full of "x gave game y a 10 so I don't care about their reviews" and it is extremly annoying and makes no sense.
Dismissing famitsu is not the same as real outlets
What's your reason going to be for dismissing the first 4/5 it gets from any outlet?
People actually think this game won't review well?
Never forgetHere's the Nintendogs 40/40 thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45026&highlight=nintendogs+famitsu
A lot of people seem to think that after a couple of previews. I think it will review extremely well. I'm predicting it's the only game (for any platform) to hit 95 or higher on Metacritic from this point forward.
Here's the Nintendogs 40/40 thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45026&highlight=nintendogs+famitsu
It's interesting how in every other famitsu review thread it's generally accepted that famitsu's reviews are essentially meaningless but when it's brought up in this thread you're just salty 🤔
A lot of people seem to think that after a couple of previews. I think it will review extremely well. I'm predicting it's the only game (for any platform) to hit 95 or higher on Metacritic from this point forward.
It's interesting how in every other famitsu review thread it's generally accepted that famitsu's reviews are essentially meaningless but when it's brought up in this thread you're just salty 🤔
Here is the thing, while that is true, the 3 reviews for botw have been a 10/10 from a place that doesn't give them out very often in Edge, a 94? From a magazine which is second highest score in magazine history, and now this where even if famitsu scores are suspect this is still only the 24th perfect score. The tea leaves seem to be pointing towards botw being a special game where famitsu's review might not be too far from the average.
GTA and 3D Mario will always have a chance to hit 95 or above.
Right up there with Final Fantasy XIII-2...
Or, hear me out, maybe the game is just really good?
Good. Very good.This thread has now made me want to buy Nintendogs
Wait for a potential Switch version, it could be pretty amazing with HD graphics and make good use of HD Rumble besides touchscreen controls.This thread has now made me want to buy Nintendogs
Did you just call Nintendogs shit? You suck.People thinking this game is going to be a Nintendogs / JoJo / any other shit game on Famitsu's perfect score list type situation
lol
Wait for the inevitable Nintendogs (Mobile)This thread has now made me want to buy Nintendogs
So, first Edge is overrated and now Famitsu is untrustworthy. Which is trustworthy exactly? Polygon?
This is like the last area in RE7.
Oh shit that's gonna be huge.Wait for the inevitable Nintendogs (Mobile)
As a game? Absolutely.Did you just call Nintendogs shit? You suck.
Here's the Nintendogs 40/40 thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45026&highlight=nintendogs+famitsu
A someone who was very critical over Skyward SwordsSame score as Skyward Sword!
Famitsu gave FFXIII-2 40/40
Because it's true? Regardless of whether BotW turns out to be terrible, bad, decent, good, amazing or whatever you can think of, Famitsu scores pretty much mean nothing.
Wait for a potential Switch version, it could be pretty amazing with HD graphics and make good use of HD Rumble besides touchscreen controls.
They already have a HD dog model, made for Smash.
Highly subjective - I hated it. Played through it completion twice, too, to make sure I wasn't crazy.A someone who was very critical over Skyward Swords
Playing it was fun
Characters were excellent
And the story was engaging
But the overworld was pathetic and that one fuckin boss that escaped from Mario Galaxy ruined it a little for me
Means nothing. Very eye-rolling.
Come off it. Brand name is what most games ride off of. That goes for any industry.
It's just getting a pass because it's Zelda.
That is such a romanticised piece of artwork that it's actually cheesy.
Means nothing. Very eye-rolling.
If I only experienced the first and last 10 minutes of a Zelda story, I personally don't feel I'd be missing much.
When I play a Zelda game, I know for a fact the story isn't going to surprise me. The story of a Zelda game always reaches a middle bar and never goes past it, and that's okay, because I'm not asking for a deep story from Zelda; I have Xenoblade to provide me a story-focused experience.
Why are people avoiding story spoilers for Zelda? It's literally the same story every time
That forced high voice was awful. It sounds so sarcastic and fake.
Not as bad as the Deku Tree's. It's really amateurish voice acting I would expect from a cheap, budget title. I thought Nintendo were all about quality?
They gave Skyward Sword a 10. It's just brand name at the end of the day.
Because it's Zelda or because it really is a good game?