Far Cry 3 PC performance thread

Salsa

Member
can we do this already? some people on GAF seem to have it and I feel like we need some confirmation on how this performs.

graphic options:

qdtgs.jpg

666666irsbs.png

benchmarks:


PC shots from KyleN (who better get in here and comment on performance):


lets just dump whatever info on PC performance we have here. I need-to-know
 
how can people have this already ? I thought 29th was the earliest
 
So I will be getting the GTX 660 ti, how likely is it that there will be Nvidia performance boosting patches for this down the road?
 
Uh, going by the benchmark, how will I even manage to run this on a Core 2 Duo and a HD5870? ):
 
So I will be getting the GTX 660 ti, how likely is it that there will be Nvidia performance boosting patches for this down the road?

very likely, probably beta drivers

how much of a "boost" though? no idea, possibly not much

Is this a new trend? New great looking games with fucking terrible performance?

games that look great tend to be beefy specs-wise?

not saying this doesnt seem excessive, hence why im asking for some first-hand experience
 
It could very well be some single setting that kills performance like ubersampling in The Witcher 2 or the DX11 features in Arkham City. I'm curious how it scales.
 
What the hell, why is it around 30fps on a 680?

My monitor is 2560x1440 and I have a 680, I guess this means I'll get sub 30fps?

Poorly optimized? or Nvidia/AMD need current drivers?

I haven't played the game yet but from screens and videos it doesn't look THAT good.
 
Is this a new trend? New great looking games with fucking terrible performance?

Isn't new at all. The best PC games---in terms of graphics---generally tax the best hardware available at the time. Which of course is a good thing.

What they also typically do is allow you to turn down/off most of that eyecandy and still run the game on midrange hardware.

What you'll notice about the posted results are that they are with everything maxed out. The real question in my mind is how it runs at reasonable settings, at 1080p.
 
It could very well be some single setting that kills performance like ubersampling in The Witcher 2 or the DX11 features in Arkham City. I'm curious how it scales.

could also run ten times better in DX9 like Arkham City. Id gladly sacrifice those features tbh
 
I also have a 680 and I am taking this german benchmark with a grain of salt since the day it was posted. It could just be a single setting that is totally messing with the FPS like the previous poster said, so have some hope.
 
It could very well be some single setting that kills performance like ubersampling in The Witcher 2 or the DX11 features in Arkham City. I'm curious how it scales.

I agree I assume its going to be the incredible draw distance in conjunction with AO. Id love to see the numbers when AO is off to compare.
 
I also have a 680 and I am taking this german benchmark with a grain of salt since the day it was posted. It could just be a single setting that is totally messing with the FPS like the previous poster said, so have some hope.

It has certainly happened before. I am not ready for this to slay my 670ftw, so it better be false.
 
There are reports Directx 11 is not selectable in the options menu.

IGN said there will be a day 1 patch for PC.
 
So...

i5 3570k
Gigabyte 670
8 GB of mem

I'm not over-clocking anything yet (really because I havn't gotten the balls to figure out how yet)
 
I also have a 680 and I am taking this german benchmark with a grain of salt since the day it was posted. It could just be a single setting that is totally messing with the FPS like the previous poster said, so have some hope.

If so, I hope its not the AA. I NEEEED AA.
 
Probably the use of an intermediary AO setting should be enough to play this @ 1080p / Post Process AA methods with a GTX 580+ with acceptable framerates.
 
Top Bottom