Quite liked the Barton Fink nod.
Just realized I name dropped Hudsucker Proxy last night when I meant Barton Fink, dammit!
Quite liked the Barton Fink nod.
So this show, and this season in particular, is about stories. That's the main theme of this season. Each episode begins with the pointed disclaimer that this fictional story is based on a true story that happened in MN in 2010, before all the other words fade out and leave just STORY on the screen.
The first scene of this season is that vignette in Berlin, where a case of seeming mistaken identity resulted in the authorities capturing the wrong man. Despite the evidence to the contrary, the officer isn't happy with the suspect's story, and makes a grand proclamation about the difference between a story, and the truth (missing the fact that he himself seems to be ignoring the truth and requesting a false story from the suspect).
Stories are all over the place this season. Stories we tell ourselves, stories we tell others, the reality lying somewhere slightly offset, next to these stories.
Ray Stussi tells the story of how his brother swindled him out of his fair share of the inheritance, leaving him with a car and taking the valuable stamp collection. Emmit tells the story that Ray begged for the car. These conflicting stories lead to Ray continually asking for money from Emmit and still not feeling repaid, before finally deciding to take what he feels he's owed. This story leads to the hiring of Scoot to steal the stamp from Emmit, which leads to a case of mistaken identity which leads to him creating his own alternate story by killing the wrong man, which causes Scoot to propose his own story to Ray and Nikki that they owe him money, which causes an A/C unit to go Gallagher on his head. This then leads to Ray and Nikki taking things into their own hands, which leads to a story of Ray and Emmit coming to terms with their differences and burying the hatchet, which is superseded by Nikki altering the story by leaving a tampon in a desk.
Everyone is writing their own story and overwriting the story of others and causing all kinds of problems. Which leads us to last night's episode.
Here we have Gloria investigating the murder of her step-father. Inside this fake true story called Fargo that takes place in MN in an episode set in Los Angeles, we have Gloria Burgle seeking answers by reading a story about an android (an android who himself goes through a tumultuous story before discovering he holds in his head the story of the entire universe, which leads to turning himself off), while uncovering the story of the writer of this story and his run ins with bad Hollywood people, who themselves have their own stories to tell, all predicated on swindling this writer out of money he earned by writing stories so they can make their own stories (and while investigating all this, encountering a horny cop coming up with his own story of how the night should go, and a friendly plane companion telling his own story). All this in the hopes that this story will somehow uncover the truth about what happened to Ennis Stussy, before realizing the story she's following has nothing to do with the truth of the crime at all. That disconnect between story and truth.
Meanwhile, we as the audience are watching these stories within stories, trying to also make sense of it and figure out how this story relates to the "actual" story of the show, before coming to the same conclusion as Gloria in the end.
This is probably why this particular episode (as good as Carrie Coon was in it, and Ray Wise), bored the hell out of me. Maybe I just wasn't in the mood for navel-gazing storyception this week. Not that it was bad, but it just felt so meandering. Like mentioned earlier, it's kind of a one-off shaggy dog story.
I get that it's all about 'stories', but it's just so dreadfully boring this go-around.
A few quotes from this:
When it comes to detours in the Fargo universe that seem unconnected to the main mystery, but bring our hero to a different brand of life understanding, the immediate point of reference going back to the original movie is the Mike Yanagita storyline. Was that a particular touchstone on this episode for y'all?
No question. We talked about this as 'The Mike Yanagita Episode' in exactly that phraseology. That was the idea from the get-go.
What's the challenge of doing an homage that's blatant to that degree, but making this into the Mike Yanagita for your Fargo?
In a certain way it's a homage, but also it's integral to the plot and theme of Fargo season three, so it's not an add-on or a strange byway. It'll make more sense as the season plays out and as we get to the end. Part of the rationale for the episode from Noah was that these are real stories, right? This is a true story. In real life there are dead-ends and box-canyons and clues that don't play out and paths you have to take in order to come back correctly onto the main path in terms of an investigation. So this always presented as Gloria feeling like she had a lead that she had to run down and realizing, at the end of it, that the particular lead and the story that she learned and the information gleaned was not absolutely pertinent to the immediate case at hand. That's a kind of thing that cops face day in and day out in real life and that was part of the impetus for the episode as well.
When she's in Los Angeles and she's investigating this lead, when do you think she realizes that it's not going to help with the actual case at hand, but that there's the resolution she needs to find that's more personal than professional?
I don't think she realizes it until the very end, until she's back at the diner with Older Vivian and it becomes clear to her. She references it, right? She says, "This is just a story," which is part of the thematic of this season: What's real? What's true? What's a story? We're telling stories all the time. To Gloria, she realizes, "This has been a fascinating look, perhaps, into a personal story that's personal to me, but in terms of my investigation as Gloria the cop, it really doesn't mean anything."
Going back to this as a stranger-in-a-strange or fish-out-of-water storyline, what were you going for in terms of how this new setting would explore a different side for Carrie Coon and Gloria?
She's a Minnesotan at heart. She comes from our Fargo Heartland, so to speak, where much of the emotion of everyday life is buried very deep under the layers of Minnesota nice, but what we discovered working with Carrie and with Noah approaching this episode is again the theme of stranger-in-a-strange-land, where her typical demeanor and defenses, if you will, that work in the Fargo geography, she's a little bit at sea here in Los Angeles. So a little bit more emotion and vulnerability and unexpected twists and turns emotionally make themselves apparent because she's on foreign turf, so to speak. So I think what happens in the episode gives Gloria a little softer side and a little more emotional side than she had in the Fargo geography.
As a counterpoint, I find the show so well made, each moment so well crafted, that when it decides to meander like this to make a point I still enjoy it a lot.
A couple of Coon and Hawley quotes:- LA Times: On the Set: Here's what it was like when 'Fargo' brought its snowy noir to Los Angeles (lengthy article about shooting in LA)
Hawley says: "This [episode] has a period element to it as well, but it's not really a period they've dealt with in their films. It has its own tone. But there is something interesting about bringing a character who sees the world in a certain way, into a world where people are much more cynical and calculating."
Coon, who was born and raised in Ohio, says the field trip brought up familiar memories.
Its very much a fish-out-of-water story for Gloria and it reminds me of the first time I came to L.A., she says. I was a Midwesterner. I came in for an audition when I first got out of the airport and I looked around, I could feel how the landscape was not part of my DNA at all. I felt like I was on another planet.
Coons Gloria is the only central character to appear in the episode.
Obviously theres a big risk in your third hour, when things are picking up steam and everyone is invested in your characters, to go off for an hour with one of the characters, Hawley says. Im interested to see how people respond to it. It felt both fun to me and important to the story. But it has to be a compelling hour if Im asking people not to see Ewan McGregor for one of the 10 weeks of the show.
Rain or shine, Hawley is pleased with the outcome of inserting the series into new, unfamiliar surroundings.
Part of my goal is that if I invest you enough in that story of Glorias stepfathers secret past, there may come a moment in the episode where you think, oh, shes going to solve it, Hawley says. Theres some fun to do it. Its also exploring the idea of futility. What can she really hope to do? If you cant bring him back from the dead, at the end of the day, what good is any of it?
Two brothers. One actor. Go behind the scenes to see how Ewan McGregor is transformed into Emmit and Ray Stussy.
Yay more Nigerians are scammer jabs! -_- Also, this is first disappointing episode in the whole series IMO, just felt like a waste of an episode.
Clint Eastwood's ex-wife and daughter, too.
I liked it, too. Do we know that the Coens even watch the show? I was under the impression they'd seen at least part of season one and liked it, but hadn't heard anything else.I thought the Barton Fink references and homage was way too on the nose. I'm surprised the Coens are okay with stuff like that.
Enjoyed Gloria's misadventure and the book animation stuff. Didn't mind this episode being filler since Fargo always feels like that in between the first episode and the last three or so.
I liked it, too. Do we know that the Coens even watch the show? I was under the impression they'd seen at least part of season one and liked it, but hadn't heard anything else.
We're just not very interested. I mean, we're perfectly happy with it. We have no problem with it. It just feels divorced from our film somehow.
So this show, and this season in particular, is about stories. That's the main theme of this season. Each episode begins with the pointed disclaimer that this fictional story is based on a true story that happened in MN in 2010, before all the other words fade out and leave just STORY on the screen.
Interesting to see the divisive reactions, I liked the first couple episodes well enough but thought they felt a little too familiar after the movie and two prior seasons. This was the episode that got me hooked on season 3, really enjoyed this one and the turn it took with the Los Angeles/70s story.
This is undoubtedly a high quality show, but it's neither as funny or suspenseful as any of the Coens' movies that are either of those things, so it comes off as kinda boring.
This year's basic problem is that there's a murder no one cares about. I mean how do you start with the premise of murder in a small town and make it so completely uninteresting?
All the actors are fabulous, but why am I supposed to care that this guy had an air conditioner dropped on his head? The dynamic of dual Obiwans is interesting, but I don't really see myself caring whether everyone goes to prison or dies as a result of this shady organization, or whether the other brother ultimately gets away with murder.
It's like they asked what's the most bland thing a television season could possibly be about and this is what they came up with.
The original Fargo movie had a body count of about 5 or 6 people if I recall, spaced out over time. It's not that they need a big gang war like last season. They just need a character haphazardly making increasingly stupid decisions over time that create suspense and are darkly funny. Darkly funny, suspenseful. Stop trying to ape every Coen trope. You are not Joel Coen.
I really wish I understood this thread. I hear that the murder is uninteresting yet I see a page full of people saying this episode was bad when it fleshed out the characters the murder effected...Yeah I have to agree with you on the bolded. The set up this season is not nearly as interesting as the first two seasons. I'm still enjoying what we've gotten so far but not quite as hooked as I was in S1 & S2 3 eps in.
The definition of filler.
I keep waiting for a Billy Bob-like character to show up but it never happens
Waited for the same thing in season 2 but no.
He's the best thing this show has produced.
This season so far - I dont care about any of the characters or find them interesting :/
Hopefully it gets better
Season 1 set the standard too high, season 2 didnt reach it, not sure if this will seeing how the first 3 eps were
He had no Billy Bob swagI'd argue Hanzee Dent was pretty close.
He had no Billy Bob swag
This is undoubtedly a high quality show, but it's neither as funny or suspenseful as any of the Coens' movies that are either of those things, so it comes off as kinda boring.
This year's basic problem is that there's a murder no one cares about. I mean how do you start with the premise of murder in a small town and make it so completely uninteresting?
All the actors are fabulous, but why am I supposed to care that this guy had an air conditioner dropped on his head? The dynamic of dual Obiwans is interesting, but I don't really see myself caring whether everyone goes to prison or dies as a result of this shady organization, or whether the other brother ultimately gets away with murder.
It's like they asked what's the most bland thing a television season could possibly be about and this is what they came up with.
The original Fargo movie had a body count of about 5 or 6 people if I recall, spaced out over time. It's not that they need a big gang war like last season. They just need a character haphazardly making increasingly stupid decisions over time that create suspense and are darkly funny. Darkly funny, suspenseful. Stop trying to ape every Coen trope. You are not Joel Coen.
This year's basic problem is that there's a murder no one cares about. I mean how do you start with the premise of murder in a small town and make it so completely uninteresting?
Her step-dad was called Ennis Stussy (real name Thaddeus Mobley), he got the name from the toilet bowl (It was Dennis but the D was scraped out).I'm bad with character names, I don't think I could tell you any of the character's names yet.
So, in that context - what is the significance of her seeing the names in the toilet bowl?
Carrie Coon owning television right now.
He had no Billy Bob swag
Liked the episode a lot but the Always Sunny guy cameo was absolutely god awful.
No one will top Malvo the gawd