You literally called it "the most mild form of sexual harassment out there."
Yes, my point was that it is classified separately in the court of law. It is viewed with increased leniency in Nevada state law. That is simply a fact.
You literally called it "the most mild form of sexual harassment out there."
Go fuck yourself. You called a guy starting to force himself on a woman trying to sleep the most mild form of sexual harassment. You ARE a sexual assault apologist.You guys are truly sad. I'm saying the Smash TOs tried to make the best recommendation they could, they looked to organizing bodies for other sports and made a recommendation slightly stricter than the strictest penalty they found. I think they tried their best and somehow you think that makes me a "molestation apologist." That's sad, you judge with too little information.
Which... is fine. It's a pretty easy and acceptable trade to get player safety and security in return.How is that different? Just cuz the money is better? Competitive smash is a source of revenue for some people and a total ban could put them back at square one of their life.
I'd also honestly like some clarification on the legal definition of "groping." When I hear that word, I'm thinking something more like grabbing someone's ass or breast (be it over or under cloths). I don't really see that it applies to sticking one's hands down another girl's pants, but my search for a clear legal definition of what constitutes groping isn't giving me a clear answer.
Yeah but he looked at the laws man, did you even ctrl+f?You literally called it "the most mild form of sexual harassment out there."
You literally called it "the most mild form of sexual harassment out there."
How is that different? Just cuz the money is better? Competitive smash is a source of revenue for some people and a total ban could put them back at square one of their life.
No one gives a damn about your fucking stupid interpretation of the law. Unless you are a Nevada cop/lawyer and she's pressing charges, it's completely irrelevant.Yes, my point was that it is classified separately in the court of law. It is viewed with increased leniency in US law. That is simply a fact.
I'd also honestly like some clarification on the legal definition of "groping." When I hear that word, I'm thinking something more like grabbing someone's ass or breast (be it over or under cloths). I don't really see that it applies to sticking one's hands down another girl's pants, but my search for a clear legal definition of what constitutes groping isn't giving me a clear answer.
This. And it's precisely why people are raking the Smash organizers over the coals for this. They could have done better, they should have done better, they didn't in the end.The point everyone is trying to make is that one year for molestation is like a slap on the wrist. It doesn't matter if Nevada says it's not bad. It doesn't matter if sports says it's not that bad.
We as a community are saying we want zero tolerance with that sort of garbage and feel so strongly that some of us don't want a game or community that associates with said individual to be around us.
Regardless of the fine, she will have to live with the fact that she was molested. She will not feel different traveling for video games now knowing what happened
We as a people and community are saying that is unacceptable behavior in any manner regardless of what state laws or sports choose to do.
Don't downplay the act of what happened. It was terrible and nothing even in the realm of that should be happening in our community and when it's brought to the forefront it should be stomped out immediately. People need to feel safe going to these events or participating in the FGC as a whole and all its subsets.
No one gives a damn about your fucking stupid interpretation of the law. Unless you are a Nevada cop/lawyer and she's pressing charges, it's completely irrelevant.
If he was rehabilitated and put on a sex offender list I'm pretty sure he's fine. Unless you have some statistic showing that former rapists are repeat offenders, I think it's excessive punishment. If the man's safe enough to go out into society and get a normal job then I'm sure he's fine to play video games for a living.Which... is fine. It's a pretty easy and acceptable trade to get player safety and security in return.
You guys are truly sad. I'm saying the Smash TOs tried to make the best recommendation they could, they looked to organizing bodies for other sports and made a recommendation slightly stricter than the strictest penalty they found. I think they tried their best and somehow you think that makes me a "molestation apologist." That's sad, you judge with too little information.
This wasn't groping, how many fucking times do people have to point it out to you for you to get it. Get it together.Yes, my point was that it is classified separately in the court of law. It is viewed with increased leniency in Nevada state law. That is simply a fact.
Fighting game communities always deliver when it comes to the misogyny and harassment. If they're trying to clean up their image responses like this show that they still care more about keeping their core base that would defend the behavior than take a hard line on making this stuff unacceptable and try to create a better atmosphere for women at events.Quit being salty af, brah.
This didn't happen though. All that's happened is that he's blamed alcohol for his sexual assault and fucked off with no legal consequences. They could have established an indefinite ban and should have but didn't.If he was rehabilitated and put on a sex offender list I'm pretty sure he's fine. Unless you have some statistic showing that former rapists are repeat offenders, I think it's excessive punishment. If the man's safe enough to go out into society and get a normal job then I'm sure he's fine to play video games for a living.
Oh I love thought experiments in sexual assault threads! What DO you wonder?In other thoughts, I wonder what people in this thread might think if a woman did this to a man.
This didn't happen though. All that's happened is that he's blamed alcohol for his sexual assault and fucked off with no legal consequences. They could have established an indefinite ban and should have but didn't.
Oh I love thought experiments in sexual assault threads! What DO you wonder?
If he was rehabilitated and put on a sex offender list I'm pretty sure he's fine. Unless you have some statistic showing that former rapists are repeat offenders, I think it's excessive punishment. If the man's safe enough to go out into society and get a normal job then I'm sure he's fine to play video games for a living.
Brilliant idea! Excellent contribution.I'm just here to stir people up
I also wonder what would happen if a goat molested a cow.No it isn't. People seem to think this guy should go to jail for 10 years for this shit but no, law doesn't work that way.
In other thoughts, I wonder what people in this thread might think if a woman did this to a man.
Edit: I obviously do not approve what the guy did. But I bet i'm going to get attacked for this anyway.
Do you crusaders know the punishment for sexual assault first offense in any other competition in the United States? 1 year first offense is very strict by comparison. Let alone the punishment in the court of law, a fine and registered as a sex offender, no jailtime. This was the absolute most mild form of sexual harassment out there and it is specifically given lower punishments in the courts compared to sexual assault involving penetration, etc.
Did I say it wasn't terrible? Pretty sure I didn't. Did I say he should get a free pass? Nope. Seems like you need to reread the last page or two.
In other thoughts, I wonder what people in this thread might think if a woman did this to a man.
You are downplaying a horrific situation using faulty logic and examples that are far from the scope of this situation, in the hopes of making EVO and the perpetrator look better.Did I say it wasn't terrible? Pretty sure I didn't. Did I say he should get a free pass? Nope. Seems like you need to reread the last page or two.
No it isn't. People seem to think this guy should go to jail for 10 years for this shit but no, law doesn't work that way.
In other thoughts, I wonder what people in this thread might think if a woman did this to a man.
Edit: I obviously do not approve what the guy did. But I bet i'm going to get attacked for this anyway.
This. It's a red herring, the guy sexually assaulted someone, there's no legitimate argument against having the organisation bam hook for life for physically, sexually assaulting a fellow participant.the legality and criminal consequences of any of this do not matter at all to the conversation about tournament bans. it is 100% irrelevant.
smash tournaments are private events that can ban anyone for any reason. they should be banning this dude because he assaulted someone. it's that simple.