Fighting Games Weekly | April 1-7 | And after 0-3, he has risen

Our beloved guide and leader EMP Triforce has spoken



And said they will test it at Next Level next week

Well who cares about beating Soul Fist

Come back to me when one of your Royal Guards develops an anti-Chris G team, Darth Triforce.

I'm being slightly over-exaggerating here, but it's also beating Chris G alongside beating Morridoom.
 
So.+She+only+got+one+present..+Which+she+smashes+in+_0a38ab816d514d0039a21c70f7518a08.gif


I don't doubt some counter will be found but I highly doubt that it'll be coming from EMP when it's only Yipes that really plays marvel 3 over there. Hell they were hyping up EMP when SFxT v2013 came around saying they were secretly playing it and had some great tech ... then Sanford show Ryu/Ken and Hiro picks Chun/Rufus with very basic play. It was solid play because of their fundamentals but nothing ground breaking or using the mechanics to their fullest.

Yeah... It's funny, the EMP guys playing SFxT aren't really going in deep on the game mechanics at all. Unoptimized damage, wrong punishes, and etc. They play really well with the cross game/capcom fundamentals but they'd be so much more beast with SFxT specific play.
 
Yeah... It's funny, the EMP guys playing SFxT aren't really going in deep on the game mechanics at all. Unoptimized damage, wrong punishes, and etc. They play really well with the cross game/capcom fundamentals but they'd be so much more beast with SFxT specific play.

Most people that play SFxT that play sf4 as well don't play SFxT right. Nothing new :P
 
I just realized something...

Why the fuck aren't General Zod and Darkseid in this?

I remember someone saying Darkseid is in but it was never confirmed, I do know hes a part of a stage and he knocks the player back to where they came from.

Edit: Ok just seen the character list, maybe he will be a dlc character
 
I'll up your meh with a bleh. Also we need to play again sometime when you got free time :P

Yeah, sure. Probably after Sega Cup or so. Gonna focus on Tekken and SFxT for Evo.

Something about losing at Final Round. Someone blocked his view of the monitor or something. I was only half paying attention.

Ah yeah, that shit. They really should implement a rule about that sort of thing. It's one thing to get beat because it's so loud that you can't focus but someone bumping up on your of blocking your view of the match is straight up wrong.
 
I'm in the next round for the EH job. My jaw dropped when I heard how many people have applied and how many people only got an invite to the interview round. Only a few passed it (tho, not all are done yet). I was rather nervous, but it went well according to Catalyst.
Second round covering technical knowledge will be held soon. Photoshop-youtube-tutorials here I come! Gotta deepen dat knowledge. Not worrying much about html.
 
Someone damn near fell into me when I was playing against Lionheart at NEC, but to be honest, since it didn't physically impact the match (I was knocked down at the time, I think) I didn't even think about it until I recalled just now.

If someone had gotten in the way of the match, I would have been PISSED.
 
I'm in the next round for the EH job. My jaw dropped when I heard how many people have applied and how many people only got an invite to the interview round. Only a few passed it (tho, not all are done yet). I was rather nervous, but it went well according to Catalyst.
Second round covering technical knowledge will be held soon. Photoshop-youtube-tutorials here I come! Gotta deepen dat knowledge. Not worrying much about html.
Congrats dude! Wish you the best of luck with the job.
 
Fool-proof even makes more sense...

Irregardless of his grammar, for all intensive purposes he is still one of the most-watched FGC personalities. He is literally blowing up right now.
I've always thought "intensive purposes" actually made more sense than "intents and purposes". What does it actually mean to say "For all intents and purposes, I am a good business owner" versus "I am a good business owner"? It doesn't seem to add anything. While "intensive" refers to things which are intense; it makes sense to say "for any intense purpose, I am a good business owner". And this would have a meaning like "For anything really important, I am a good business owner".
 
Pretty crazy how solid these guys are. I mean after watching Floe play numerous times since the game came out he seemed indestructible but wasnt really the case from this tournament and I think he lost to Dyne at WNF as well. Pretty cool to see a good mix of high level players out there.
It is what years of consistent practice and playing will do to you. Mar, Dyne and Kajoq haven't taken a break from the game at all so they're always in great shape. Floe is pretty nasty for an on and off kind of guy. He'd be a real threat if he played consistently the way they do.

Dyne is a monster btw. He is the boogieman of VSav online. The thing that goes bump during the night. West and Midwest rule at VSav if you ask me.
 
I've always thought "intensive purposes" actually made more sense than "intents and purposes". What does it actually mean to say "For all intents and purposes, I am a good business owner" versus "I am a good business owner"? It doesn't seem to add anything. While "intensive" refers to things which are intense; it makes sense to say "for any intense purpose, I am a good business owner". And this would have a meaning like "For anything really important, I am a good business owner".
I got called out on this once on GAF during some argument or another. I still don't know which is right but they both seem pretty sound to the point that it's semantics.
 
Thing thing I hate the most on GAF is the recent saying "RIP in peace". Does anyone even know what "RIP" stands for anymore? I really get a laugh out of it sometimes tbh.
 
Fool-proof even makes more sense...


I've always thought "intensive purposes" actually made more sense than "intents and purposes". What does it actually mean to say "For all intents and purposes, I am a good business owner" versus "I am a good business owner"? It doesn't seem to add anything. While "intensive" refers to things which are intense; it makes sense to say "for any intense purpose, I am a good business owner". And this would have a meaning like "For anything really important, I am a good business owner".

Do you not know what the word intention means?
 
I got called out on this once on GAF during some argument or another. I still don't know which is right but they both seem pretty sound to the point that it's semantics.
Oh, "intents and purposes" is the correct phrasing, I just don't understand why people say it.

Do you not know what the word intention means?
I do, but saying "For all intents and purposes" is first of all redundant within itself, since intentions fit under the category of purposes. Second, to say "for all purposes" is just another way of saying "always", since there could never be a non-purpose you are addressing. It's long-winded and redundant.
 
We need a tear list of the worse grammar mistakes

Illiterate tier

Could/Should/Would of
Their instead of there and vice versa
Full proof
Tier vs Tear
More better/bigger/faster etc.
Could care less

High School drop out tier

Irregardless
Your vs You're
Mahvel
I vs Me (Mike Ross and me are going to the beach)
Dat and Da vs That and The
Loser vs Looser

Didn't get high scores on SAT tier

Affect vs Effect
Literally vs figuratively
Intensive purposes
Sudoku vs Seppuko
 
Top Bottom