Coffeeling
Member
do people not understand how tier lists work anymore? A friend of mine tried to convince me that T Hawk is top tier even thought he admitted he has a ton of bad match ups.
Now how does that make since? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't tier list determined by how many match ups you are dominant or weak to?
Not exactly. That's the way characters are typically arranged on matchup charts, but an actual tier list has to take other stuff into account, like weighting the matchups.
ie. Make a Brawl character with straight fives for matchups, one wins against Meta Knight and loses to Zelda, the other against wins against Zelda but loses to Meta Knight. An unweighted matchup rating would value the characters the same while one should be far ahead of the other on the tier list. Or take Abel in SF4. Blows up lower tier characters, doesn't do that well against the top. In points, very good. In practice less so.
Prevalence can play a part too: Would you rather play a character who does bad against Akuma than a character who does bad against Evil Ryu or Elena in the US?