Sorian vs. Darryl means little. Sorian being Sorian and Darryl being Darryl means nothing, because the easiest way to play scum is to just be yourself. I do want to say some stuff:
I'm trying to understand this:
So, the motive behind this vote is either:
1. You want to generate discussion.
2. You have a reason to believe Hyperactivity is a warrior of chaos.
3. You're a warrior of chaos.
It's obviously not point 1, since you are vocally aware that one vote is meaningless in the grand scheme of things (even raising this point yourself).
If it is point 2, you haven't brought up any reasoning for this alongside your vote.
I think it is point 3, you're a scummy warrior of chaos.
I don't care what inane methods you use for your sacred random voting technique. That's blatant deflecting, as I never cared why specifically you voted for Hyperactivity. I'm questioning why you're trying to preface your "pressure" votes with advice that actually deflates the pressure and makes the whole process arbitrary. That opening post appears very much like someone trying to look town. Giving arbitrary towny advice and a meaningless vote gesture meant to advance the game, which simultaneously conflict in purpose. You either want to pressure people or you don't. Right now, you are inbetween. Why are you inbetween?
You're reaching. I agree Sorian's opening posts and votes don't really mean much, they really are sort of useless, but you're assuming and filling in blanks mentally that we can't really fill yet. Your argument, tbh, is sort of ridiculous
You literally need to stop arguing on behalf of other people. You also need to read the posts fully if you're trying to understand these arguments. If you're town and Sorian is scum, you're just giving him an easy out. I hope you realize that. Your defense of him doesn't even have an impact on my argument against Sorian. I do not care who Sorian voted for. He could have voted for you or me. I'm questioning his conflicting motives.
Don't attack someone with an argument that surmounts to being a pile of wet toilet paper, then get mad when someone doesn't want to waste any more time between you two having a hissy fit.
There's a difference between defending someone and pointing out that's someone's argument is complete and utter horseshit. Am I defending Sorian now for pointing that out? Xam perhaps?
Let him shout at the wind, this is a court of public opinion, and it's easy to see that Darryl is trying to write some story here.
And tbh you sort of are too
Honestly, your rng method is stupid. By this point, I've gotten to the point where I just sort of ignore it. "Oh he voted me first. Whaaateever." You're around to post a bunch, and you always do the same things: take all the posts that say "HEY I'M TOWN", or try to assume a town leader position. I assume it's a given at this point- don't role claim day 1, everyone vote, etc. I guess it bears worth saying, but you have a habit of almost hogging them so as to take up that mantle.
Actual read on the situation:
IDK?? Darryl being weird, Sorian just being Sorian (which means crap all), and I didn't forget the random vote for me from Nin. But you know, maybe other people have decided that Sorian's method sorta works?
Tbh it's sort of a fault of mine at this point (just talking to myself now), I ignore votes if it's just one or two
Day 1 is always stupid, expect a little less from me today (still have school for a bit, plus nothing ever happens). Unless there's some role that might be useful day 1