What's with the retconning in this thread? You think Tukedo Mask is a boss? He's a useless goof, or at least, he was, in nearly every scenario!
Yeah, Tuxedo Mask doesn't really do anything by himself. But without him, the scouts would've died a million times over.What's with the retconning in this thread? You think Tukedo Mask is a boss? He's a useless goof, or at least, he was, in nearly every scenario!
The difference between a show implying a longing between two characters and pandering to hebephiles/ pedophiles is night and day though.
Read what you typed. Gosh. "Punishment" of this innocent show. Haha!
I am half-joking.
BUT I AM ALSO HALF SERIOUS.
No.
NO.
Then I think you're taking this more seriously than you should be, certainly more seriously than I am, and more seriously than a discussion of cartoons requires, and construing the word punishment to be more severe than I had really meant for it to be.
The show, and shows like it, are something a lot of people car significantly about. If its something that is cared about, if its something people are invested in, its worth taking seriously.
Have you actually watchdd either show? There's something sleazy about K-On that nothing Nickelodeon produces can even approach.Well it doesn't. Just calling these shots as I see 'em. The way people are talking in this thread is sort of wild considering everything else that goes down on GAF.
I can't say I agree, because the way people are acting isn't the kind of "serious" that I'd say is very respectful of stuff people are invested in. If you're launching accusations of pedophilia at people without some good means of backing that up, then there's no conversation to be had, only witch trials.
It's fine to debate, to disagree, and to get heated, but some of the accusations I've seen in this thread reflect poorly on people I know are capable of better discussions.
Have you actually watchdd either show? There's something sleazy about K-On that nothing Nickelodeon produces can even approach.
Prax has touched on some of the things that back up accusations of...okay, I wouldn't call it pedophilia, that's too strong and I don't think its accurate, but I would call it innocence-fetishism, namely the way the show frames some of the characters movement and emphasizes their bodies and physical closeness, the implied (did it get further then that?) lesbian relationship between two characters in a series utterly lacking in any other kind of relationships, and a portion of the additional media and memorabilia produced surrounding the show that seems to serve that fetishism. Is it enough to say the show "caters to" or "panders to" a certain crowd? No, probably not. But its an undercurrent there and you'll have a hard time convincing me its not a deliberate one.
http://i.minus.com/iBMg3cTfJIryo.gif[IMG]
Totally boss.[/QUOTE]
I really was a fan of Tuxedo Mask when I was a kid. I thought he was such a boss.
I had to look up Potemayo ('Potato-Mayonnaise'?), and yeah, art-wise speaking, that is more 'blob'-like, but the term moe-blob also seems to include character types/story. From all accounts (I've only seen bits of episodes here and there) K-On in general is very blob-y (bland, soft in terms of personalities/story, the art is very edge-less for characters, etc.), so it falls under that. And I'd agree that it's hard to imagine how (or why?) people would sexualize something like Potemayo, but K-On's characters aren't so deformed that they don't resemble living creatures. So, you might see cute like one would puppies, but that's not what I tend to hear from the K-On fans when they do chime in, something this thread highlighted pretty clearly. *shrug*
Cos anime.Also...Why are we talking about K-ON and pedophilia again?
I haven't seen K-On, no, but I have seen some implicitly skeezy stuff coming off some of those Nick shows.
Well sure, and if everyone were able to discuss things using that vocabulary, the discussion could go better, but launching accusations of this nature are anathema to good discussion, because right off the foot you've got people on the defensive. I wouldn't call that taking things seriously. I mean, you can only expect so much on a website where people routinely think it's okay to judge something about someone based upon their avatar, but I really think we can do better than this thread has done.
So I really hope Sailormoon knows who's its audience SHOULD be, and I hope they don't think it should be obsessive-type otaku. lol For their own sake. And for the sake of the show. So that I may enjoy it more.
My cousin and I are deciding to ignore how ugly the poster art is, because usually promotional poster art stinks, and hope that the actual execution of the show will look better.
Isn't that kind of redundant? I mean otaku already means that someone is obsessiveSo I really hope Sailormoon knows who's its audience SHOULD be, and I hope they don't think it should be obsessive-type otaku. lol For their own sake. And for the sake of the show. So that I may enjoy it more.
My cousin and I are deciding to ignore how ugly the poster art is, because usually promotional poster art stinks, and hope that the actual execution of the show will look better.
What's with the retconning in this thread? You think Tukedo Mask is a boss? He's a useless goof, or at least, he was, in nearly every scenario!
Back when I was living in USA Michigan 2002 for a couple of years, we had an aerial and would mess around with it to suddenly find cartoons on one channel. The reception was terrible, but the first cartoon was Sailor Moon. My sister and I liked it, probably cause it was the only entertaining thing on. Then she went into Cardcaptor Sakura and sadly CLAMP rubbish.
Was this person banned for this? Please say yes. D:Terrible design. I hated the manga design too. The original anime series had a great design. For the new show I was hoping more for something like this:
It would have fit so perfect to the show and overall feel. Also they should have ditched the whole magic thing and just concentrate on Usagi being moe and Rei being hot as hell etc.
Woah woah woah whats this whole pedo thing with k-on?
Absolutely nothing. Background noise.
So I really hope Sailormoon knows who's its audience SHOULD be, and I hope they don't think it should be obsessive-type otaku. lol For their own sake. And for the sake of the show. So that I may enjoy it more.
Thank your for the sanity.MaschinenZimmer had it right. This forum has become a powderkeg of moral panic and almost irresistible to stirring the pot just to see everyone explode over the worst sort of guilt by association. It's not even actual wrongdoing that people are enraged about, as anime fans most certainly not raping children as the rhetoric would imply, but nebulous and vague notions of unacceptability that involve both hypocrisy and misattribution. Yes, many are socially awkward and have weird interests. That's because they're male nerds. Once we can return to acknowledging this maybe threads can have actual discussion again instead of constantly being shut down like it's the Catholic League proclaiming boycotts of Disney films or evangelicals proclaiming the satanism in Dungeons and Dragons.
With regard to K-ON, it's actually not as simple as many would like, as you're actually referring to three different iterations. The original manga was most certainly targeted to the otaku audience, but the adaptation by Kyoto Animation--with female director Naoko Yamada and female lead writer Reiko Yoshida--progressively reworked the material. In the first anime, you still had moments that have the male viewer in mind, but in the second anime it goes completely off the source manga with significant changes in tone and structure. Overall, even considering said moments in the first season the overwhelming impression you get watching the actual show is that it's pretty damn inoffensive for all the wild reactions produced by it. In fact, Disney Channel in Japan picked up the show for broadcast for a time, and according to one published set of statistics (1 2), women made up a third of its viewing audience, with similar age distribution. Anecdotal reports from this forum also attest to a large female following in the movie's theatrical release in Japan.
Regardless, that all of this angst and hand-wringing be attached to Sailor Moon, a property that has been wildly successful in multiple countries, not just America and Japan, and across age and gender lines is an absolute disgrace.
I bet they will considering that the Moon Brooch on the picture looks like in the manga.I really like the artwork, can't wait to see the rest of the team. I hope they keep the belts on Jupiter and Venus, the jewel on mars and Mercury without sleeves.
The hips part?MaschinenZimmer had it right.
I think these are the funniest 'Sailor-moon' related videos i've seen on Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTH2HiTRjYA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35hNcorE00k
Absolutely nothing. Background noise.
Same, I'm a huge "Moonie" and can't wait for this reboot. I've recently got the manga so if the art and story reflects this I'll be happy.Another insecure pedo anime debate in a Sailor Moon thread of all things? What the hell, really.
I for one am hyped as fuck for the reboot.
I would suggest being able to articulate more clear and informed points, lest you become confused with people who actually ARE making such accusations. Your tone is a little disingenuous on that account.Exactly. It is goddamn background noise. Its background noise in so many goddamn japanese games I play. Its background noise in a ridiculous amount of anime I watch, bits of fanservice here, hints of sexuality there, often with regards to younger or more innocent characters, and its something that I don't really see out of other media to such a high degree. And while this thread was certainly derailed by it, I think its a conversation thats important to have and it seems like there's never going to be a good place to have a conversation about it because every single attempt to say something like "some of the ways this piece of media frames its female characters seems a bit skeevy" is met as an accusation of "OMG YOU ARE ALL PEDOPHILE DEVIANTS". I've been talking about it in here so much just because it was finally somewhere where it seemed like a couple other people were also trying to articulate similar viewpoints, but we all know how well a dedicated thread to the subject would go.
Same, I'm a huge "Moonie" and can't wait for this reboot. I've recently got the manga so if the art and story reflects this I'll be happy.
I would suggest being able to articulate more clear and informed points, lest you become confused with people who actually ARE making such accusations. Your tone is a little disingenuous on that account.
Again, you're not entirely off as that's the influence of the source material, but one that gets reduced with each step.I haven't called anyone a pedophile here. I've said that I dislike the dishonesty demonstrated in some aspects of K-On (and in similar media, but K-On is a good example precisely because of how popular and well known it is) by both creators and a section of the fandom between its surface intentions as an utterly innocent show and something more...fetishized. I hesitate to even call it sexualized, although that's part of it, fetishized does seem like the more appropriate word.
Again, you're not entirely off as that's the influence of the source material, but one that gets reduced with each step.
He was trolling, and obviously so. My point was that this has become such a kneejerk issue that such a bait is much too effective.Sure, but this entire discussion was sparked by a poster who wished the Sailor Moon reboot looked more like K-On and then posted the "dem hips" gif