• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

First Reviews for The Martian (dir. Ridley Scott; based on the book; Matt Damon)

Status
Not open for further replies.
WOW, that's a ton of shit. I hope we can get a director or extended cut with those scenes.

honestly, when I reach that part in the book, it started getting a bit tiresome with just how many shit gone wrong one after the next, I'm actually kinda glad they skipped that part when I watch the movie.
 

NekoFever

Member
It's basically the coping mechanism that keeps him going on instead of opening the airlock door without a sealed suit.
Also the author said he wanted to write about the cool science rather than getting bogged down in a study of a man slowly driven insane by isolation.
 
Also the author said he wanted to write about the cool science rather than getting bogged down in a study of a man slowly driven insane by isolation.

Right. It would be a different, and not necessarily better, film with a character who isn't as upbeat. I prefer this.
 

donny2112

Member
I preferred the book version of the ending though.
I thought Weir's version was more exciting with Beck venturing out and pulling Watney from the MAV, but I guess Hollywood and all.

I liked the revised ending better. Lewis was blaming herself for leaving Watney behind, and so in a crunch, she takes the rescue of him on herself. Also love that Watney did get to go the IronMan approach. When it shifted to Earth, I was afraid they were going to use the original book ending, which sucked. I'm glad they made it a positive thing where he's training the next gen of astronauts about survival, though. Agree with the other guy that said the monologue about Earth rising up to help 1 guy would've been good to still have, too.
 

Kin5290

Member
I liked the revised ending better. Lewis was blaming herself for leaving Watney behind, and so in a crunch, she takes the rescue of him on herself. Also love that Watney did get to go the IronMan approach. When it shifted to Earth, I was afraid they were going to use the original book ending, which sucked. I'm glad they made it a positive thing where he's training the next gen of astronauts about survival, though. Agree with the other guy that said the monologue about Earth rising up to help 1 guy would've been good to still have, too.
Yeah, I agree that
Lewis strapping into the MMU to catch Watney herself was an important moment of catharsis for her. Plus Jessica Chastain looked totally badass in that scene.
 
I liked the revised ending better. Lewis was blaming herself for leaving Watney behind, and so in a crunch, she takes the rescue of him on herself. Also love that Watney did get to go the IronMan approach.

Yeah, I agree that
Lewis strapping into the MMU to catch Watney herself was an important moment of catharsis for her. Plus Jessica Chastain looked totally badass in that scene.

I didn't mind Lewis doing it or that it was cathartic for her as the commander. What I didn't like was the silliness of the whole Iron Man thing. It reminded me of that fire extinguisher scene from Gravity, but extra goofy.
 

Epix

Member
I don't get. If the
survival of the initial mission depends on an object tipping over, why wouldn't anchoring it down be job 1?
 

d00d3n

Member
I liked the movie a lot, but I felt that one piece of information was unfairly withheld from the audience. Someone who read the book, please tell me
how did the main character dispose of his human waste during the 50 day trip in the Rover without an air lock?
 

Astral Dog

Member
its worth a watch , competent movie but for some reason i disliked it, like at half the film you already know whats going to happen and you don't longer care anymore. bloated.
 

npa189

Member
Just got back from the theater and I really enjoyed it. Not as dark as Scott's other movies but the moments of brevity were a nice change of pace.
 
Man you guys are hard to please. You don't want any exposition, or its considered spoon feeding, or hand holding.

What do you want? They are telling a story, do you want Terrance Malick in space?
 
Man you guys are hard to please. You don't want any exposition, or its considered spoon feeding, or hand holding.

What do you want? They are telling a story, do you want Terrance Malick in space?

It's just a big word that people like to throw around. People complain about exposition but don't understand movies without.
 
I liked the movie a lot, but I felt that one piece of information was unfairly withheld from the audience. Someone who read the book, please tell me
how did the main character dispose of his human waste during the 50 day trip in the Rover without an air lock?

I havn't watched the movie, and I'm probably talking out of my ass on that one, but isn't it possible that he used it as manure for his "green house"?

google gave me this: clickme

warning: its really boring

That's not what I heard or read.
 
I kinda hate how the movie doesn't mention that in addition to being a Botanist Mark Watney is also a Mechanical Engineer. That's why he has the knowledge necessary for a lot of the other stuff he does besides potatoes.
 

d00d3n

Member
I havn't watched the movie, and I'm probably talking out of my ass on that one, but isn't it possible that he used it as manure for his "green house"?

Yeah, he does that in the beginning of the movie, but later he travels in a cramped vehicle for 50 days in a row.
 
Yeah, he does that in the beginning of the movie, but later he travels in a cramped vehicle for 50 days in a row.
Oh ok, that's weird. No idea then.

He ate it.

rainbow_barf_by_emeraldwolfs12-d4sws2f.png
 

Nerdkiller

Membeur
I really liked it. It was a lot better than Interstellar in what it tried to accomplish (at least the exposition it had didn't water down those awe inspiring moments by telling us how everything works), that's for sure.

Also, let me give it a try...

The Martian |OT| Sean Bean lives in this.
 
I kinda hate how the movie doesn't mention that in addition to being a Botanist Mark Watney is also a Mechanical Engineer. That's why he has the knowledge necessary for a lot of the other stuff he does besides potatoes.

In the context of the film, you just kind of get that he knows about lots of different branches of science, with a concentration in botany. He's doing physics, chemistry, etc. I don't think it's a big deal to simplify it a bit for the film.
 
I liked the movie a lot, but I felt that one piece of information was unfairly withheld from the audience. Someone who read the book, please tell me
how did the main character dispose of his human waste during the 50 day trip in the Rover without an air lock?

In the book there are tent like attachments that connect to the rover's air lock. The rover in the movie isn't really like the one described in the book. Also, I saw an interview where Scott said this is one of the last scenes cut from the movie. I assume it will be included in a DC when the movie is released on bluray.
 

vareon

Member
I loved it! Though the book did a better job in explaining Watney's space hacks (well being a book, it can afford a lot more scientific explanations) like him counting every tiny bit of calories or oxygen he has. In the movie he kinda became a witty botanist who survived mars.

They omitted one disaster, too, which I think is for the best considering the length of the movie.
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
Saw it earlier.

It was fantastic, definitely a must see. I was surprised at how funny it was, it got lots of laughs from the crowed.
 
I loved it! Though the book did a better job in explaining Watney's space hacks (well being a book, it can afford a lot more scientific explanations) like him counting every tiny bit of calories or oxygen he has. In the movie he kinda became a witty botanist who survived mars.

They omitted one disaster, too, which I think is for the best considering the length of the movie.

Regarding the disaster:
They actually omitted more than one. Losing communication after frying Pathfinder, traversing the storm, and flipping the rover driving into the crater.
 

vareon

Member
Regarding the disaster:
They actually omitted more than one. Losing communication after frying Pathfinder, traversing the storm, and flipping the rover driving into the crater.

Losing communication leads to him traversing Mars without any help, which then lead to the storm and possibly the flip. I count him frying Pathfinder as the disaster that leads to another, but yeah it's basically what you said.
 

Mengy

wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
I just saw it tonight, I freakin loved every minute of this. I'll be seeing it again for sure and then buying the BR day one. Between Gravity, Interstellar, and now this, man what a time it's been lately for great space movies. I hope this trend continues.




I haven't read the book yet but now that I've seen the film I am going to.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
I enjoyed it. I can quibble about a lot of smaller plot movements and how a few too many characters are quirky and funny, but it does the broad strokes well. It's certainly aimed right at my wheelhouse, I love grounded space exploration stories and especially stuff involving the utter power of space and other worlds.
 
Losing communication leads to him traversing Mars without any help, which then lead to the storm and possibly the flip. I count him frying Pathfinder as the disaster that leads to another, but yeah it's basically what you said.

I wanted to see him navigate the storm in the movie, but it doesn't work without losing communication with NASA. I think they made the right decision by cutting out some of them though.
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
Was anyone surprised to find out that it was 2 hours and 21 minutes? It's one of those movies that never feel long since there's never a dull moment.
 

Quick

Banned
Saw it earlier. Damn good movie. I regret not reading the book before seeing it, but I'm definitely more motivated to do so (I own a copy).

It never occurred to me until after the movie that Mars' gravity wasn't accurately depicted. I think that speaks to the level of immersion I had with the movie.

The humour was pretty safe, I appreciate that aspect of the movie. Mostly inoffensive (fucks here, shits there).

Spoiler for a critical moment in the movie:
Purnell's method to visualize the slingshot maneuver (gravity assist), aka Project Elrond (fucking LOL at this just for Sean Bean being there) was pretty awkward, but Teddy saves it by cutting the bullshit. In any case, I got pretty hyped when they were talking about the slingshot maneuver, being a casual observer of astrophysics and loved Apollo 13.

Was anyone surprised to find out that it was 2 hours and 21 minutes? It's one of those movies that never feel long since there's never a dull moment.

Time flew by for me as well. There wasn't a moment where I felt the need to check the time or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom