• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Christopher Nolan Sets Next Movie At Universal In Imax For Summer 2026 With Matt Damon Eyed To Star

the martian GIF

What the fuck is this thing?! Jesus, Am i going to have nightmares tonight? 😂
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Bond movie set in 80s with Holland playing main role
Only if there was a scene where all the Bond villains were standing around, being shot from the waist up, asking "wheres Bond? Anyone seen him?" and you see a little pair of hands jumping into and out of the bottom of the frame as diminutive TH tries to get their attention.
 

sankt-Antonio

:^)--?-<
People shitting on Tenet is wild to me.

The opening sequence alone is worth the price of admission assuming you saw it in IMAX or Dolby. When the heavy bass kicks in when the SWAT team starts jogging through the stadium and throughout that entire ordeal was god-tier.

The concept is super fun. Robert Pattenson's character was amazing. The protagonist was awesome. Set pieces were sick.

Definitely agree that it's not the most coherent of his works, but as an experience it was peak, and on rewatch you get extra tidbits and details that make it a treat.

...

Nolan movies are always a must see, so whatever he's got Damon doing, I'll be there day one in the best theater available.
In what world is the protagonist awesome? He’s a nameless, emotionless, uncool bond concept, not a character that makes the audience feel any emotion.

I don’t even want to understand why he choose to do this - it’s dump and made the movie worse.

And that’s a theme with Nolan. His nonsensical “no goes” that in this day and age just make his movies worse.
Like him having a handful of extras on set to show the battle of Dunkirk, robbing it from epicnes, or him directing action in Batman when he is just objectively bad at it.

He should have used CGI in one and leave action to someone who knows how to do it in the other.
It’s maddening because his movies could be legitimate classics. But it’s like he wants to sabotage them himself. Tenet with a likable main character could have rivaled Bond.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Because I do not think they could make them like that. They would get the aesthetic, but not the culture. they would inject todays culture into the 80s.
Fair enough. I think a few of the retro-80's styled projects (Stranger Things, Totally Killer) hit it pretty well all things considered but yeah, I agree that the right vibe would be hard to recreate. Certainly the callous humor of that era would be hard to reproduce and James Bond as he existed back then would be an absolute no go by todays standards (which is why I think a throw back film COULD work, his womanizing ways CAN work with a deft touch and especially if its Henry Cavill doing it :p
 

Keylime

ÏÎ¯Î»Ï á¼Î¾ÎµÏÎγλοÏÏον καί ÏεÏδολÏγον οá½Îº εἰÏÏν
In what world is the protagonist awesome? He’s a nameless, emotionless, uncool bond concept, not a character that makes the audience feel any emotion.

I don’t even want to understand why he choose to do this - it’s dump and made the movie worse.

And that’s a theme with Nolan. His nonsensical “no goes” that in this day and age just make his movies worse.
Like him having a handful of extras on set to show the battle of Dunkirk, robbing it from epicnes, or him directing action in Batman when he is just objectively bad at it.

He should have used CGI in one and leave action to someone who knows how to do it in the other.
It’s maddening because his movies could be legitimate classics. But it’s like he wants to sabotage them himself. Tenet with a likable main character could have rivaled Bond.
The protagonist was charming and handled the intensity of the action well, which was really all that was required of him. The actor playing him I thought killed it.

I can definitely get that they didn't give him some oscar-worthy dialogue, but for Tenet it feels like the "world" is more or less the main character. I didn't buy the romance angle at all with the woman, but I thought that actress did well. The main villain was appropriately over the top.

Totally get that it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea, but as far as insane set pieces and cool world mechanics, I loved it.

Inception is the better movie of the two when it comes it comes to this kind of thing, as it gave the characters more emotional threads to pull on...but the experience I had with Tenet hit me much harder and stayed with me longer than Inception has.
 

RagnarokIV

Battlebus imprisoning me \m/ >.< \m/
Just compare them with Pattison which is absolutely wonderful to watch in it and has very little to do besides being the coolest mysterious sidekick.

intro-1646432055.jpg
I absolutely love Robert Patrick, he’s great in everything. He should have been James in the new Silent Hill movie.
 

clarky

Gold Member
Tom Holland? FFS. Dudes been stinking up Spiderman for too long as is.

Will reserve judgement as Nolan pulled that Joker out of Ledger somehow, but still.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
The protagonist was charming and handled the intensity of the action well, which was really all that was required of him. The actor playing him I thought killed it.

I can definitely get that they didn't give him some oscar-worthy dialogue, but for Tenet it feels like the "world" is more or less the main character. I didn't buy the romance angle at all with the woman, but I thought that actress did well. The main villain was appropriately over the top.
Washington? No way, he is a total wooden plank. Same lack of range in The Creator. These types of roles are not his bag, he is woefully miscast with those directors. Both Nolan and Edwards can't write or direct emotion well, so they need the actor to do all the heavy lifting and Washington just didn't do it. Tenant I think was just too much for any actor, but The Creator could have definitely used a more dynamic lead.
 
Top Bottom