Petrie said:ATP?
adenosine triphosphate, basically the "energy" muscle need to actually function (at the cellular level).
Petrie said:ATP?
Copernicus said:adenosine triphosphate, basically the "energy" muscle need to actually function (at the cellular level).
Tater Tot said:I'm 5'11 and weigh 195. Probably will want to get to 175 if possible. I'm not overweight I actually look fit jut want to weight less.
PumpkinPie said:I think I overdid the exercises yesterday, totally slept for over 12 hours, I felt like my body was dead...just fucking intense fatigue and tiredness.
Saadster said:Did you get the proper nutrition, that really does matter. Also, did you stretch prior to exercise?
Edit: And I didn't even ask, what did you do?
Copernicus said:Creatine helps your muscles squeeze out more ATP, which in turn allows you to train harder/longer.
PumpkinPie said:EDIT: I found some Creatine pills at a fitness shop, the dosage is 10,000mg daily. I have no idea how this compares to the dosage of powdered Creatine, does anyone know anything about them?
Ketchup Boy said:I use Optimum Nutrition Double Chocolate. Great stuff. Been using it is since high school (about to start 5th year of college).
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000QSNYGI/?tag=neogaf0e-20
Over 1000 reviews. 4 & 1/2 stars out of 5.
Para bailar La Bomba said:What kind of creatine is it monohyrdrate or ethyl ester or hydrochloride?
My preferred brand of creatine is GAKIC by Muscletech. My only advice when taking any kind of creatine is drinks lots and lots of water.
For those who can't stomach its side-effects -- bloating and cramps while doing cardio -- I recommend taking L-Arginine and L-methionine - -they're the animo acid precursors to the creatine produced in your body.
PumpkinPie said:It's monohydrate, here is the link to the pills:
http://www.myprotein.com/uk/products/creatine-monohydrate
I've no doubt that it works as that site is respectable, I'm just wondering how it compares to powder... the powder states: "Proven to improve strength and power" whereas the pills only say: "Can aid strength and power gains".
J Tourettes said:You're a UK gaffer? Be sure to use MyProtein's price match facility. I always do and get my unflavoured WPI much cheaper.
Edit: copy and paste www.bulkpowders.co.uk into their price matcher and you should be able to get creatine ethyl ester tabs cheaper, not sure if the creatine monohydrate tabs get any cheaper.
Abs day.Liquidsnake said:BroScience GAF, I get off work in an hour, and I am heading to the gym.
Is today a bicep day? Or a chest day? Please help me decide!!!
cuevas said:Abs day.
Liquidsnake said:Maybe I should do a split chest/biceps. 45 min sound good? 4 exercises x 4 sets x 10-12 reps for both chest and bi's sound good?
Get a routine and stick with that.Liquidsnake said:Maybe I should do a split chest/biceps. 45 min sound good? 4 exercises x 4 sets x 10-12 reps for both chest and bi's sound good?
I usually go 50/50 white and chocolate milk to create a thick, frothy shake. If you want to limit carbs, just use skim milk or 50/50 skim milk and water.The Int3rsect said:After a year of mixing my whey with water, I tried it with milk today. Damn that tastes good!
Check out the routine in the OP. Yeah...I don't think things were ever like that btw.Hyuga said:New here!
Well, quick question:
Is it still "arms&shoulders" - "breast&stomach" or did things change?
My schedule: Tuesday, Thursday, Sunday.
(tuesday -> arms&shoulders, thursday -> breast&stomach, and so on, and so on)
Almond milk works great too.OpinionatedCyborg said:I usually go 50/50 white and chocolate milk to create a thick, frothy shake. If you want to limit carbs, just use skim milk or 50/50 skim milk and water.
Jason Ferruggia said:Last Wednesday I drove over to Rawesome in Venice, like I do every week, to pick up some meat, produce and a little raw butter, cream and goat yogurt. I arrived at the tail end of a government raid in which the LAPD and government officials poured out all of the raw dairy and left with a flat bed truck full of produce, nuts and bison steaks.
We all know that its not in the best interest of big business/big pharma for us to be healthy. Apparently selling healthy, organic food is now a crime. A crime worthy of jail time and $123,000 bail for the owner, James Stewart.
Like many members of this small co-op I am very passionate about healthy food and was pretty disgusted and had to seriously question the world we live in. There are SOOO many other more important issues to spend taxpayers money on. But instead they choose to focus on raw milk.
Whether you drink raw milk or not Im sure you can see how insane this is. At the Whole Foods right next door they sell pasteurized dairy which is a hell of a lot worse for you. And in the fast food joint next to that that they sell absolute crap that will destroy your insides. Then theres the liquor store a block down. But booze, cigarettes and French fries are all good. No one ever dies from too much of those items. So let them be. Take down the little organic food market instead. Thats more worthy of a raid than any crack house around.
The ridiculousness of it all leaves me at a total loss for words.
Heres what Forbes.com had to say about the raid:
"Obviously spending this much time and this many resources to bust people selling dairy products is silly. Making arrests, rather than simply issuing a fine for non-compliance, is silly. And yes, the fundamental issue here is the silliness of requiring permits or making outright bans to sell raw milk in the first place. Permits typically dont make us any safer, and can serve to crowd out competition. In this case, big dairy farms are crowding out smaller competitors."
And heres some video footage from last Wednesday:
X-Frame said:Francis, I'm interested especially after reading this article by Jason Ferruggia about Raw Milk and how the government are fighting against it. It's pretty sickening, especially when you watch the videos in the article.
The War On Raw Milk - by Jason Ferruggia
YouTube - Rawesome Foods Raided Again!
YouTube - Government War on Raw Milk
YouTube - Rawesome Raided by FDA
I have 0% faith in the government to give me health or nutritional advice, that much been been clear to me for years -- but this is nuts. I don't know much about raw milk, and from an evolutionary stand-point I don't know if humans drank it often and was a part of our diet, but I can totally see it being more natural than pasteurized. I clearly has some form of lactose intolerance as I believe most people do as well.
Building on the belief that raw milk is the stuff of greatness, a writer for Strength and Health, John McCallum, penned articles touting raw milk as the way to grow (later compiled into the book The Complete Keys to Progress. Randall J. Strossen, editor of that book, took that idea a step further, and suggested that everyone drink a gallon of milk a day and do his 20 rep squat program. It's my understanding that Strossen merely repackaged McCallum's ideas about milk and squats, which would make sense, as it was still legal to produce and transport raw milk in the US in 1965 (when McCallum penned the book). In retrospect, I'd imagine the fact that Pat Casey (the first guy to bench 600 lbs raw) and Doug Hepburn (the first guy to bench 500 raw) drank 6 quarts of milk a day factored into the belief that a gallon of milk a day is the way to super-strength as well, as it really drove home McCallum's suppositions.
No matter who invented it or why it became so popular, the adoption of that diet in this century is fucking ridiculous for a variety of reasons, starting with the fact that it's impossible to purchase raw milk easily in the US, and pasteurized and homogenized milk borders on indigestible for most people. Whereas raw milk merely ferments in your intestines (which actually makes it better for you), pasteurized milk putrefies. (Bieler, 211) Additionally, pasteurized milk is shown to be among the top three food allergies, and has symptoms ranging from ear infection and bad breath to asthma, admonial cramping, diarrhea, croup, and asthma, even in people who are lactose tolerant.(Audette, 58) Throw into the mix the fact that even skim milk contains 205g of sugar per gallon (and has a higher GI than fatty milks), and you've got a fucking recipe for disaster. Thus, in straining the shit out of your digestive system, you're getting a paltry 145g of protein for your efforts, not all of which will be digested, due to the fact that the fat molecules in homogenized milk are broken down into smaller parts and become a stealth delivery system for the proteins that puts them directly into your bloodstream, causing allergies. Pasteurization takes care of the rest, killing all of the enzymes that would aid in the digestion of this chemical monstrosity, putting the final cards in place to facilitate the transformation of milk from a benevolent Dr. Jekyll into a slavering, soul-rending, baby-raping, eviscerating horrorshow of a Mr. Hyde. At best, it's a quick way to get fat as shit, in my opinion, unless you swing a sledge all day long at work, or you've got the most freakish metabolism of all time, and at worst, you can pretty much wreck every one of your body's internal systems with GOMAD.
Incline move the bar path more vertical, towards the head, putting more stress on the shoulders.PumpkinPie said:What's the difference between incline and decline chest presses in terms of muscles worked?
A spot works, too.parrotbeak said:Starting Strength suggests dips instead of decline. Decline is dangerous because if you miss and lose control of the bar it lands on your throat. So if you do them, you should probably do them in a squat rack/cage, and piss off everyone in this thread.
PumpkinPie said:What's the difference between incline and decline chest presses in terms of muscles worked?
Alienshogun said:Two months and I've made a bit more progress. More muscle, and it appears I'm losing more fat (albeit slowly).
Pics from two months ago.
(taken June 28th).
These are from just now, again, I'm not flexing in any of these pics, because I find that a bit cheesy, and it also makes it hard to hold the phone straight.
And here is me about a year ago. (yes, my hand is resting on my gut)
And here is my calf (this one I AM flexing in), it's hard to tell due to lighting, but my calf muscle (the main part of it) bulges out more than most peoples biceps (even people who focus on biceps, lol).
My stats currently are 5 foot 8 inches. 235 lbs, Benching 355, DL 405, Press 225. (1RM taken 2 months ago). Squatting 285 5x5.
parrotbeak said:Starting Strength suggests dips instead of decline. Decline is dangerous because if you miss and lose control of the bar it lands on your throat. So if you do them, you should probably do them in a squat rack/cage, and piss off everyone in this thread.
I've done it too, although only when the gym was pretty empty.Veezy said:I will admit, I've used a cage before when doing over loaded bench press to work on my lock out. Nothing wrong with it.
The thing with both is the range of motion is shorter, so you should actually be able to do more than what you would bench.ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:Inclines and declines are pretty easy if you don't go overboard on your first try, a strange ass sensation (inclines are tough though but damn good). Good workout for the muscles that keep all the shit in control I guess. Easier if you have a spotter, I'm able to go bout 80% of my normal bench for declines without any problems. Dips would be more tri's than chest?
Veezy said:Little bit of history, taken from Chaos and Pain's blog, on why GOMAD, without using raw milk, isn't really effective:
As for your post, it's simply stupid. I can understand the desire of a governement to protect it's people. Shit, that's their job. However, spending tax dollars on sending federal agents into a whole foods store to pour out raw milk is dangerous, stupid, and I'm pretty sure unconstitutional. At least we can still buy Jack Daniels.
parrotbeak said:I've done it too, although only when the gym was pretty empty.
The thing with both is the range of motion is shorter, so you should actually be able to do more than what you would bench.
Dips work the tris more, but angle yourself so you are more horizontal and you'll hit the pecs.
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:Good work man, you will have to shave your legs to show of your calves
parrotbeak said:Starting Strength suggests dips instead of decline. Decline is dangerous because if you miss and lose control of the bar it lands on your throat. So if you do them, you should probably do them in a squat rack/cage, and piss off everyone in this thread.
Tell her that daddy has to show off those legs and that it's totally manly to flex your shaved body for your internet fitness group composed of other strong well built men.Alienshogun said:Thanks, yeah, I thought about that, but my wife isn't too keen on me shaving anything but my back. She thinks it's "manly."
What to do, lol.
Veezy said:Tell her that daddy has to show off those legs and that it's totally manly to flex your shaved body for your internet fitness group composed of other strong well built men.
Alienshogun said:Thanks, yeah, I thought about that, but my wife isn't too keen on me shaving anything but my back. She thinks it's "manly."
What to do, lol.
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:Listen to the lady
Being blessed with calves is pretty fucking awesome. Mine are probably about as thick or a bit thicker than a 2 litre coke bottle without much training....... people jelly, I know.
X-Frame said:I'm another one blessed with calves - so are all my brothers and my father. Mine are 3 inches larger than my arms.
I assume I would need to do ridiculously high volume, reps, and weight in order to get them to grow which would look so badass .. hmmm ..
i love his videos, cuz he crams so much good stuff in there. "Your face has nothing to do with what's going on in your shoulder." That's so true but never thought of it--why reinforce a nerve path that does nothing good; at best it distracts and takes energy, and at worst could lead you to put something out of alignment.X-Frame said:Dips can also be dangerous for your shoulders if you don't have the shoulder extension ROM to do them safely.
Watch this Kelly Starrett video to see what I mean -- I bet most people do it the wrong way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ARPjekZPJw
Ya, I only do db inclines regularly so it's pretty theoretical for me also, but I see at least one guy at the gym regularly doing bigger loads on incline and decline than he does on bench (and in the cage, but he's considerate about it). I agree, the stabilizing muscles are what's interesting about them, so mixing it up with dbs make sense.ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:Well I guess theoretically, but damn............ try get the same amount up on incline (harder) or declines (easier than incline) and you will soon be fucked. Been doing inclines with dumbells and switched to barbell the other week, different feeling altogether. Gonna start that Layne Norton thing soon and think I might mix it up with bar and dumb just because of the effort involved and the control muscles.
X-Frame said:I'm another one blessed with calves - so are all my brothers and my father. Mine are 3 inches larger than my arms.
I assume I would need to do ridiculously high volume, reps, and weight in order to get them to grow which would look so badass .. hmmm ..
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:Yeah calves are pretty hard to grow, the gym I go to goes up to about 300 pounds on the calf raise machine and I can bounce them pretty easily..................... does mess with my lower back though
Likewise genetics with my family, old mans short and stocky 5'something with huge calves, I'm about 6' with bigger calves , 2 bro's with good calves but I will be rocking the tree trunks soon.
parrotbeak said:i
Ya, I only do db inclines regularly so it's pretty theoretical for me also, but I see at least one guy at the gym regularly doing bigger loads on incline and decline than he does on bench (and in the cage, but he's considerate about it). I agree, the stabilizing muscles are what's interesting about them, so mixing it up with dbs make sense.
Jason's Ultimatum said:I have flamingo legs. Come at me bro.