Supermanisdead
Member
lmao, incredible video. she really thought

Private property, public property, neither matters in regards to the point I was making. That being that her actions do not violate the First Amendment.
No where in that does it say that a private entity does not have the right to curtail free speech. I can give an example. As an employer I am fully within my rights to fire an employee if I find their speech objectionable, like say if an employee were to call a customer a nigger. Calling someone a nigger is not illegal, but I'm well within my rights as a private citizen to fire the employee and therefore punish them for their free speech which in turn is a form of suppressing their free speech. The only thing that the First Amendment puts constraints on is the power of the government, nothing more.
Flag desecration has been declared protected speech by the Supreme Court.
You are wrong.
No, I'm not, you've simply missed my point. The protesters actions are protected only to the extent that the Government cannot suppress their speech. Read, "the Government." Ms. Manhart is not a part of the Government and therefore she cannot violate the First Amendment.
Okay? Did someone say this wasn't the case?
snip
Take a look back through the past 12 pages and read how many times members of this website state that it's hypocritical to state your support for the First Amendment and your support for Ms. Manharts actions simultaneously.
Actually it very much does. If a public entity (university) allows a private actor to infringe upon speech, then it can be seen as state action, ESPECIALLY in what is typically seen as a public forum where speech protection is at its highest. So spare us your con law lessons, thanks.Private property, public property, neither matters in regards to the point I was making. That being that her actions do not violate the First Amendment.
What difference does that make?
She still stole their property.
Don't worry. Daycru knows a guy that knows a guy.The guy with the gun is a violent criminal? He had a gun, the story mentions nothing about a violent crime being committed. Where are you getting this information? Please share.
There is a big lack of patriotism and respect in our country. I'm not necessarily against free speech, but find it sad that some can't sympathize with the veteran trying to stop this act.
Yes, she did. This is unquestionably legally wrong. My position is that the law is in conflict with what's right. I say this knowing full well that this is a subjective opinion and one that is unpopular around these parts.
Take a look back at the thread and understand the difference between calling someone hypocritical and doing something illegal.
As I've made quite clear multiple times I do not question the illegality of her actions.
Okay...fair position to take, but it doesn't matter because it's still legally wrong?
Veteran is arrested for taking American Flag from disgraceful thugs. Go to www.TacticalStreamer.com to find out more info on similar episodes that plague America. www.twitter.com/coolspecter www.twitter.com/Tactical_Stream
Combating the bias in the main stream media, giving you unfiltered intelligence updates and analysis of current events
Specializing in real-time on the ground video for our clients experience. We provide multiple angles of view, multiple points of interest.
If you disapprove of the protest and/or the woman getting arrested for theft, just say so without trying to reinterpret the Constitution.
Nice sneak-in of "nigger" too
If you disapprove of the protest and/or the woman getting arrested for theft, just say so without trying to reinterpret the Constitution.
Nice sneak-in of "nigger" too
I don't fear words and it made my point. Also, there is no reinterpretation of anything in my post. If you disagree with what I've said please elaborate.
I completely disagree with his post but it is a perfectly valid and reasoned post. I don't know what to make out of yours, though, other than a passive aggressive jibe carrying an implied, baseless accusation of racism. I think it's unnecessary, but a lot of users use that word within the same context. Are they all racist, or just the ones that don't conform to your views?
I already did. You don't understand the body of law you're discussing.I don't fear words and it made my point. Also, there is no reinterpretation of anything in my post. If you disagree with what I've said please elaborate.
I already did. You don't understand the body of law you're discussing.
In short... You really have no idea what you're talking about.I wasn't referring to you, and I chose to ignore your earlier post because it had no bearing on my point and was needlessly hostile. The actions of the University are not in question here, whereas the actions of the woman have been for the duration of this entire topic. Your point is unsourced and irrelevant either way.
What?There is a big lack of patriotism and respect in our country. I'm not necessarily against free speech, but find it sad that some can't sympathize with the veteran trying to stop this act.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/42128300...llenge-stomp-on-american-flag/?#sp=show-clips
Social media challenge: Stomp on American flag
Cryingeagle.jpg
I was about to ask if this story had anything yo do with this challenge video some people have been posting on fb calling for all true american's to hang a flag in their yard or just get out of the country.http://video.foxnews.com/v/42128300...llenge-stomp-on-american-flag/?#sp=show-clips
Social media challenge: Stomp on American flag
Cryingeagle.jpg
http://video.foxnews.com/v/42128300...llenge-stomp-on-american-flag/?#sp=show-clips
Social media challenge: Stomp on American flag
Cryingeagle.jpg
http://video.foxnews.com/v/42128300...llenge-stomp-on-american-flag/?#sp=show-clips
Social media challenge: Stomp on American flag
Cryingeagle.jpg
"I'm a small government guy, but I would say that it's time for our legislators to introduce something to make it illegal to disrespect a flag and maybe even treat it like a citizen."
I love people who preach small government but then what new laws whenever their beliefs are hurt. How do they not see the hypocrisy of that viewpoint? "Get the government out of my business except when people are doing things I don't like!"
'This is so hard to watch' - It's only a flag, fucking Hell.http://video.foxnews.com/v/42128300...llenge-stomp-on-american-flag/?#sp=show-clips
Social media challenge: Stomp on American flag
Cryingeagle.jpg