Florida could let homeowners shoot down drones over their property

winjer

Member

Bill SB1422, which is currently making its way through the Florida Senate, seeks to expand the definition of no-fly-zone restrictions on unmanned aircraft systems. These areas currently cover the likes of prisons and airports, but the bill seeks to add residential homes.

Under the bill, homeowners will be permitted to use "reasonable force" to prevent a drone from violating their expectation of privacy.

The bill specifies that the drone must be flying under 500 feet over someone's property before they are allowed to take action against it.

There's no definition of what reasonable force entails, but considering it's a drone flying several hundred feet in the air, it's pretty obvious what most people's favorite deterrent method will be.

However, Florida's potential law appears to conflict with federal law. Under FAA guidelines, drones are considered aircraft, so shooting one down could lead to 20 years in prison and/or a fine of up to a quarter of a million dollars, even if one is hovering over your backyard.

Even Florida's own current laws could be a problem. The state prohibits the firing of a gun in a residential neighborhood unless the resident is defending their life or property or engaging in lawful hunting. It's hard to imagine drones being a threat to life or property.

Florida already prohibits drone owners from using the devices to take photos or videos of private property, citing a person's right to privacy, though there is nothing in the statute about using a live feed.

The bill has already made its way through several committees and is set for a vote by the full senate. Should it pass, the law could come into effect as early as October this year.

Last July, a 72-year-old man was arrested in Florida after he admitted to shooting down a Walmart delivery drone. He told officers that he had prior experience with drones and believed that the UAV was surveilling him. In an impressive display of marksmanship, he struck the drone with a shot from his 9mm pistol as it hovered about 75 feet above the ground.

If this Bill passes, Florida will become even wilder than today.

Shooting Pew Pew GIF
 
FYI in France is is almost impossible to fly a drone, there are so many restrictions and exclusion areas that you might as well not bother. Which kinda makes sense if you are filming anything with other humans.

The law seems to me a bit of a common sense and trying to account for the current situation i.e. Florida already prohibits drone owners from using the devices to take photos or videos of private property, citing a person's right to privacy, though there is nothing in the statute about using a live feed.
 
Nobody is going to be shooting at drones 100's of feet in the air, you probably wouldb't even realize they are there at that altitude.

But one peeking into your kids windows or buzzing your pool? Skeet on!

But I imagine this is prelude to one of the anti-drone tech companies coming out with a consumer grade, severely depowered, version of one of their toys that would work on a basic toy drone, but nothing used by military or police.

And if this forces "drone delivery" companies to work out how to operate in residential zones without being a MASSIVE nuisance, all the better.
 
If I were to advertise myself as a Drone Hunter, would that count?

Serious question though, how can you have a right to privacy if you don't have any recourse against people that violate it? As these devices improve, how can you be expected to track down the owners of these things? Not like you can use a jammer either
 
This makes me even less inclined to visit the United States.


Good for Orange, it's causing tourism in the country to plummet, while in Asia it's at a high level.
 
They do know all those bullets flying in to the air missing that really small target have to come back down again right... right? Or is gravity woke now? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
This makes me even less inclined to visit the United States.


Good for Orange, it's causing tourism in the country to plummet, while in Asia it's at a high level.

If the fact that your drones might get shot down in Florida keeps you from visiting the entire country, then like...I think your standards for living are a bit high.
 
This makes me even less inclined to visit the United States.


Good for Orange, it's causing tourism in the country to plummet, while in Asia it's at a high level.
From the sound of things, you're better off staying in your house. How you made this stretch is beyond me. Florida doesn't have drones everywhere with cowboys blasting around like a south park episode
 
Last edited:
"you can shoot it down" is probably not strong enough, to be honest

I'd rather see "if you can verify that someone knowingly flew a drone over your private property at low altitude, you can directly initiative a criminal complaint against them." A much stronger deterrent.
 
Nobody is going to be shooting at drones 100's of feet in the air, you probably wouldb't even realize they are there at that altitude.
Unless you're shooting it from your own drone patrolling above your property. Ensue epic dogfights with your neighbors own patrolling drones.
 
"you can shoot it down" is probably not strong enough, to be honest

I'd rather see "if you can verify that someone knowingly flew a drone over your private property at low altitude, you can directly initiative a criminal complaint against them." A much stronger deterrent.
I can't get my neighbords to stop shooting off fireworks in the middle of the block one 4th of July while insurance premiums continue to shoot up. I can show videos of wild fires destroying houses and neighbors just herp derp dont care.
 
Unless you're shooting it from your own drone patrolling above your property. Ensue epic dogfights with your neighbors own patrolling drones.
Drones that have geoboundaries and hunt other drones within them will ABSOLUTELY be a thing.

Girls/women already live in perpetual fear of peepers. Now its even worse. Plus drones being used to mess with your property or lifestock. Or find your grow lab.....so tghe tech can go either way.
 
I'm not completely against drone regulations, they just need to be more civilized and tied to harsh penalties. I'm glad they're still expensive toys in my country, but as they will become more affordable some neighbors will definitely become assholes by invading your space and spying on you.
 
The most effective way to shoot down a drone in a rural setting depends on the drone's size, altitude, and speed, as well as the tools at hand. Here's a breakdown:
  • Shotgun: A shotgun with a spread pattern (e.g., birdshot or buckshot) is intuitive for hitting a small, moving target like a drone. At close range (under 50 yards), birdshot (#7 or #8) could work due to its wide spread, increasing hit probability. However, range is a limitation—most shotguns lose effectiveness beyond 50-75 yards due to pellet dispersion and energy loss. Drones flying higher (100-200 feet, common for consumer models) would be out of practical range. Heavier shot like buckshot extends range slightly but narrows the spread, making aim harder. Choke selection (e.g., modified or improved cylinder) can optimize spread for closer targets.
  • Rifle: A rifle, especially a semi-automatic like an AR-15 chambered in .223/5.56, would be more effective for drones at longer ranges (100-300 yards). The flat trajectory and higher velocity ensure better accuracy against a moving target. A low-power optic (1-4x scope) or red dot sight would aid in tracking. However, hitting a small, agile drone requires good marksmanship, as there's no spread to compensate for error.
  • Other Options: For a thought experiment, consider unconventional methods:
    • Net Guns: Used by some law enforcement, these fire a net to entangle the drone's propellers, effective up to 50-100 feet but rare for civilian use.
    • Lasers: High-powered lasers (not consumer-grade) could theoretically damage a drone's electronics or sensors, but range and precision are issues.
    • Electronic Jamming: RF jammers can disrupt a drone's control signal, forcing it to land or crash, though this isn't "shooting" and requires technical know-how.
A shotgun can work if the drone is low (under 50 yards) and slow. Birdshot's spread (about 1 inch per yard of travel) gives a forgiving hit zone, but beyond 75 yards, pellets lack the energy to reliably damage a drone's critical components (motors, battery). Larger drones (e.g., industrial models) may shrug off light shot. For higher or faster drones, a rifle's range and precision outshine a shotgun.
Key Factors:
  • Drone Altitude: Most consumer drones fly 100-400 feet, pushing shotguns to their limit but within rifle range.
  • Speed: Drones like the DJI Mavic can hit 40 mph, making tracking tricky for both weapons.
  • Environment: Rural settings reduce collateral risk, but falling debris could still be a hazard.
For most scenarios, a rifle offers better range and precision, while a shotgun is simpler for close, low-flying targets. Practice and familiarity with the weapon are critical either way.

thx grok, time to build my arsenal
 
Shooting bullets in the air seems like a great idea. I had a friend killed when I was younger because he caught a stray from someone celebrating the 4th of July. I guess I like the idea of getting rid of drones over your property as a general idea.
 
Shooting bullets in the air seems like a great idea. I had a friend killed when I was younger because he caught a stray from someone celebrating the 4th of July. I guess I like the idea of getting rid of drones over your property as a general idea.
There are still state & local laws/ordinances about shooting firearms around populated areas.

This would probably fall under and be subject to those already in place, thus meaning you can only really get away with it where you have a lot of land outside those restrictions.
 
Top Bottom