Ultra Numb
Member
Mayweather, easily.
Even at age 40, he's probably going to be too fast for Conor. Then there's the technical skill and intellect in the ring which is arguably Floyd's greatest strength.
Also, the whole "Floyd hasn't dealt with power like Conor before" I think is a load of rubbish. Sure, unless we get Floyd's previous opponents in a time machine to see who punches harder then we can't really conclude anything... but there's a big fucking difference between striking in Boxing and striking in MMA. Anyone with any experience in both fields will tell you this. At least as far as punching goes. In my opinion Floyd's been hit by guys that have tremendous knock-out power, just as much if not more than Conor has.
It's absolute insanity to even compare one of the all time boxing greats, to a guy with a 0-0 pro record. There's going to be so many angles Conor just won't be ready for.
The big question isn't who wins, it's how Mayweather wins.
Even at age 40, he's probably going to be too fast for Conor. Then there's the technical skill and intellect in the ring which is arguably Floyd's greatest strength.
Also, the whole "Floyd hasn't dealt with power like Conor before" I think is a load of rubbish. Sure, unless we get Floyd's previous opponents in a time machine to see who punches harder then we can't really conclude anything... but there's a big fucking difference between striking in Boxing and striking in MMA. Anyone with any experience in both fields will tell you this. At least as far as punching goes. In my opinion Floyd's been hit by guys that have tremendous knock-out power, just as much if not more than Conor has.
It's absolute insanity to even compare one of the all time boxing greats, to a guy with a 0-0 pro record. There's going to be so many angles Conor just won't be ready for.
The big question isn't who wins, it's how Mayweather wins.