If it looks like bollocks, and it comes from Twitter, it's most likely Twitter bollocks.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Football Thread 2012/13 |OT| The Beautiful Game
- Thread starter elseanio
- Start date
- Status
If it looks like bollocks, and it comes from Twitter, it's most likely Twitter bollocks.
I'll throw an estimate of £2-3,000 for the jacket.
Kolarov, not Clichy. From official Twitter:
COMMUNITY SHIELD: City starting lineup Pantilimon, Savic, Kolarov, Kompany, Zabaleta, Milner, Yaya Toure, De Jong, Nasri, Tevez, Aguero
If they are playing 3-4-1-2, Milner will play wing back. It will be very easy to revert to a 4-4-2 later on, with
Zab-Man - Savic - Kompany - Kolarov
Milner - Yaya - De Jong - Nasri
Tevez - Aguero
Mancini usually change formation very fast in matches.
Also, let's see how Savic handle Mata, Torres and Hazard.
We switch to a 4-3-3, do it right Mancini.
They're not that clever.
Steverulez
Member
This match is going to be a blood bath if We're playing 4-3-3.
I hope RDM has more sense than that. Seen 4-3-2-1 touted (the old Christmas tree formation) would make more sense as Ramires can still bomb forward from midfield, hes usually very tame if hes on the right and Hazard was crap against Brighton on the left, its just not a formation that will work this season for us.
I hope RDM has more sense than that. Seen 4-3-2-1 touted (the old Christmas tree formation) would make more sense as Ramires can still bomb forward from midfield, hes usually very tame if hes on the right and Hazard was crap against Brighton on the left, its just not a formation that will work this season for us.
Also, we stole all their scouts.
Im not convinced theyre willing to let go of Johnson, otherwise I suspect we'd have done a deal for Agger a while ago.
Thank fuck United cooled their interest :lol as Viva said on Twitter, it was always a worry we'd end up with him
Any medical will be done on a weekday, but I'm still sure we're going to sign him.
When we signed those City scouts, did we send Comolli the other way?
fuck me £18 million for Rodwell
If Mancini thought coaching Savic was a challenge, wait until he gets the self perpetuating master of potential onto the training pitch. I've got many Everton friends, all of which are chuffed to bits with this, Rodwell was perhaps worth a hefty price tag a few years ago when his potential was coming to the boil, but he's done barely anything and progressed little in a couple of years.
Praying for Savic to have a good game; I look at that formation and I think Agger would be a beast on the left of that central three. I don't like it, not one bit. Hope City are off the trail and they're looking at targets who actually see their club as a positive destination.
fuck me £18 million for Rodwell
If Mancini thought coaching Savic was a challenge, wait until he gets the self perpetuating master of potential onto the training pitch. I've got many Everton friends, all of which are chuffed to bits with this, Rodwell was perhaps worth a hefty price tag a few years ago when his potential was coming to the boil, but he's done barely anything and progressed little in a couple of years.
Praying for Savic to have a good game; I look at that formation and I think Agger would be a beast on the left of that central three. I don't like it, not one bit. Hope City are off the trail and they're looking at targets who actually see their club as a positive destination.
City is in urgent need of a backup CB and also a backup CM to cover for Yaya. Mancini always talks of how important it is that his players are versatile he sign a player, like Milner. Rodwell is capable to fill both spaces that City need.
If that's worth £15m though, I'm not sure... but at least he has PL experience. Hopefully his injury prone:ness is out of his way, otherwise he'll just be a replacement for Hargreaves.
About £20 extra, for Sky Sports and Movies pack I think. Might be cheaper for you, as you aren't the home market.
Plus I hate how the rights are split up in the UK, it's on Sky Sports and ESPN
Joel Was Right
Member
It costs us £42.50 to have the Sky Sports package. That isn't including channels like EPSN, or a HD signal - which vary between £6-10. We pay a bit more for multiroom (a box for each room); around £67 in total.
Talking about Sky, I ordered their Fibre Optic broadband yesterday. 40MB download / 10MB upload. Costs £20 and when you consider that they dont do any speed throttling, its a great deal. It means my streams will be crystal clear high quality!
He's Clev-esque.
An an England fan, part of me hopes Rodwell takes this opportunity in a top team to really push on, live up to his potential and become a leading player for one of England's top teams (Rodwell being the only promising young defensive midfielder England seem to have atm).
The rest of me however, can only see this being a complete disaster that completely kills off Rodwell's aspirations to be a top level footballer, a la SWP, Adam Johnson or other England youngsters who wasted away on the bench.
The rest of me however, can only see this being a complete disaster that completely kills off Rodwell's aspirations to be a top level footballer, a la SWP, Adam Johnson or other England youngsters who wasted away on the bench.
Is that how much it is now? FUCK.
Agger would be in the position that Rodwell or De Rossi would play. I think the Agger saga is over.
Also two of the City scouts decided to stay in Manchester. We took the head honcho but the minions didn't follow.
As I expected, Mancini is going with Kolarov over Clichy. City's defense will be really hard to predict this season.
67 pounds is monthly? Because that sounds like an awful lot. At the moment I pay my TV provider 15 euro's per month extra to receive four channel plus the four same channels in HD.
Word has it Murdoch is going to go with Skysports with a new box, so I hope it won't that as expensive as you guys say :S
EDIT
Oh wait, the numbers you're telling me include internet, telephone and stuff too?
Do you mean the Anfield game? He was alright, but certainly not brilliant. Gerrard's performance that game was brilliant, Rodwell just functioned moderately in a team that got banged possession wise.
I hope so, I really do.
If you just want Sky + the Sports it's about £40. Sky Sports package is £20ish, but the price is going up soon iirc.
Joel Was Right
Member
Well the actual sports package is £21, but that is only an add-on; you need to first select their default entertainment package which in itself costs £21.50. So you'll need to pay at least £41 a month to watch the football. I just pay extra for the documentary and news channels
Entertainment Bundle - £26.50
Sky Sports - £21
Multiroom subscription - £20.50
The internet and telephone line is a separate £32.50 a month
I priced it up there now on Sky's website and to get Sky Sports with HD is £40.25 a month.
Broder Salsa
Banned
Hmm, still a bit more than the money I'm paying now, but that's more like it
I don't think Sky will come here with the complete package, guess it's all about the sports. The market for internet, tv etc. is very clouded already.
Joel Was Right
Member
Nope. It would be at least £51 if you include HD. Actually in our case, we pay a little less; we have a 20% discount offer (we pay £54 a month for our above package). The trick is, once you've completed your contract period, ask for a reduction because you cannot afford to continue paying the bill. We managed to get that discount without having to sign another 12 month contract.
If I could, I would only pay for the Sports because I'm not that bothered about losing the other channels. But sadly they dont offer that separately
Vivalaraza
Member
Wait a minute.
Did Bolton get relegated?
Did Bolton get relegated?
Shite missed you got £10 off your first month, aye £50.25 a month.
Yeah lol fuck Dixon he's just mad RVP is on his way to us.
Yep. Something I keep forgetting too.
I've got a mini muller corner, a chicken tikka masala form Tesco, a stubby Biere D'or from Tesco, and I've winged a fiver on City to win.
Football's back.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked