Rob Green you are shite just give up
Danny Simpson's a prawn.
That little floated early cross he does irks me, too.
Either way, the right decision was made so it's probably time to just drop it.
Far too common. No on ever wants to shoot now. Baffling.City playing tiki-taka in their box. Typical.
Now you're just acting childish.Anywhere that's not inherently team centric, so no RAWK or RedCafe, or Twitter, or even GAF.
We'll go off Guardian, MOTD, and BBC. Best of three.
I'm getting worked up with you, not anyone else, I'm enjoying discussing it.
I'll just ignore you in future.
Good goal by Evra, he's been ridiculous recently.
I honestly think Chelsea could win the league. City and Man Utd will drop enough points, its not exactly La Liga
Someone sub David Luiz. Apparently playing 3 feet forward compared to normal means you should shoot on sight!! Idiot. Play the ball and move it around.
Max Power scores for Tranmere. What a name.
Come on now.I honestly think Chelsea could win the league. City and Man Utd will drop enough points, its not exactly La Liga
I honestly think Chelsea could win the league. City and Man Utd will drop enough points, its not exactly La Liga
Right, off to a mate's then we're driving to Stoke. In a bit lads, enjoy your football.
It may be ridiculous to say that anyone who isn't a United crony would call it an illegitimate goal, but it's also daft to suggest that only a hater would call it legit.
Come on now.
Watch out for flying limbs.Right, off to a mate's then we're driving to Stoke. In a bit lads, enjoy your football.
I honestly think Chelsea could win the league. City and Man Utd will drop enough points, its not exactly La Liga
Had a similar situation a few years ago with Koscielny getting a toe to a ball in an attempt to deflect it from reaching Saha, who was about five yards offside (though Koscielny couldn't have known that). He didn't get a solid touch to the pass and it trickled through to Saha, who then scored. It was a big deal at the time, and ended with Graham Poll coming out and explaining why it shoudl've stood. So I guess by the letter of the law, the ref in this game did the right thing.
I still think it's outrageous. His presence in an offside position undoubtedly affected the defender's decision to go for the ball.
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/generic/81/42/36/lawsofthegame_2010_11_e.pdf (p. 100)In the context of Law 11 – Offside, the following definitions apply:
• “nearer to his opponents’ goal line” means that any part of a player’s
head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the
ball and the second-last opponent. The arms are not included in this
definition
• “interfering with play” means playing or touching the ball passed or
touched by a team-mate
• “interfering with an opponent” means preventing an opponent
from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing
the opponent’s line of vision or movements or making a gesture or
movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an
opponent
• “gaining an advantage by being in that position” means playing a ball
that rebounds to him off a goalpost or the crossbar having been in an
offside position or playing a ball that rebounds to him off an opponent
having been in an offside position
LolLooks like we didn't turn up for the second half. Fuck football.