It’s not. It’s just sad and convenient that as soon as Barcelona and a lot of the ‘established’ European clubs like Juventus are starting to feel the squeeze financially outside investment is all of the sudden great again.
It’s almost as if FFP was nothing to do with financial fairness and was all about preventing new challengers to the old guard, cementing their place at the top forever (no more teams doing what Chelsea, PSG and City did).
It says it all that FFP did nothing to stop Barcelona’s wage bill escalating to ludicrous heights and has nothing about DEBT in its legislation.
Despite the name of FFP if you read the content you will see it clear as day that it is there to make sure clubs do not go bankrupt nothing more. The thing is it didn't trust wealthy owners that are injecting money today that they will be injecting money in the future so it wanted to make sure that the clubs are actually able to source their budgets on their own.
In Barcelona case they were actually able to source their budget but they were on the edge of it, then they got a bad president coupled with an unforeseen global pandemic and that kicked them clear over the edge. FFP does not stop you from going near the edge because you are still within your means and allowed to exert yourself to the best of your ability to achieve more.
The thing is with this whole thing clubs like PSG, Manchester City and Chelsea got owners that I expect to continue to support their clubs for a long time but if clubs became assets of business then slowly but surely the sport as a whole will be dismantled to be optimized for what those investment firms think will make the best money for themselves, yes including asset stripping and dismantling clubs. For a preview look at how the sport "franchises" are handled in the USA and how their sports rules and everything about it is changed to suite advertisers and interest groups..etc
I maintain that this is bad for a sport as a sport.