lmao!
What was funny?
lmao!
Sorry, left-wingers, but no one signs away their First Amendment rights just because they go to college. And it's time to start suing the administrators who try to make students do so or punish students for violating their legally indefensible speech codes. The Cripmas party looks like something from Saturday Night Live and was probably a lot of fun.
Goddamit, if this was strictly about taking the piss out of gangs they wouldve had a clue about which gang wears which colour. It's so transparently obvious their intention was to mock black, inner city subculture, which theyve ignorantly defined as being all about gangs and thug life.
But then again I dressed as Hitler for Halloween, so maybe I am not politically correct enough.
If it's just the clothing, I really don't see the issue at all. They're representing a fucking gang, taking the piss out of it. Not representing black people and taking the piss out of them. But then again I dressed as Hitler for Halloween, so maybe I am not politically correct enough.
What gang are they representing? Please, observe the picture carefully before you answer.
What gang are they representing? Please, observe the picture carefully before you answer.
I get it, they said crib party but they are not donning all blue. Regardless, they are taking the piss out of gang culture. So what ? I see balaclavas, I see stupid hand-signs, I see ridiculously low trousers. These are all part of various gang cultures. I really don't get the issue.
In England there are so many dress as "chav" parties. Would you consider ripping into this subculture offensive as well ?
At Spork, Nah I'm British.
lol so mocking a criminal violent groups is tantamount to mocking black people ...
That doesn't answer my question. If they are taking a piss on gang culture then what gang or gangs are they portraying in that image? What does a lot of the imagery in the photo even have to do with gang culture aside for the non-specific hand signs?
They look as dumb and stupid as real gangs.
Yea you might think they look dumb and goofy in pictures but I sure as shit would not be saying those words to their faces.
No gang specifically, but the idea that a lot of gangs wear low hanging trousers, balaclavas and over-sized garments whilst throwing silly hand-signs. I see that in the photo.
I just googled LA gang to get these, so validity is unknown. The people in the photo don't look too far off apart from being super lame.
The issue with that pic is that they aren't really portraying any of those street gangs seen above. They're kinda just dressing like shit they seen on tv shows and movies that portray urban culture and the inner cities and conflating it with gangs which is the point that doesn't sit well with a lot of people and probably why they were reprimanded. Not that an accurate portrayal of the crips (where they actually wear blue bandanas and clothes) wouldn't have gotten in trouble either. I asked that you be precise here for this reason.
This very lame party is hardly worth national attention. If this were a Howard University frat doing a prohibition-era Italian gangster party, I don't think anyone would care - because nobody should care. I don't frankly know what their motivations or internal thoughts were when deciding this minor lapse of racial sensitivity, but a serious national discussion on it is a waste of our collective energy.
Did he write that? He asked what gang their supposed to be dressed as at their "Crip"mas party. If it was an actual Crip party they would all be wearing blue. These little shits clearly just threw on what they think black/urban people wear, having dick all to do with Crips.
Hahah jesus christ ... what is this?
You have to distinguish the fucking proper gang name to mock gang culture now ... ? Because otherwise it's mocking black people.
You do realise your saying all black people wear the same urban clothes and act like they are in a gang. To me that is the most racist statement in this thread by far.
Youre being intellectually dishonest and are about to derail the thread. Please stop.You do realise your saying all black people wear the same urban clothes and act like they are in a gang. To me that is the most racist statement in this thread by far.
Your replies to me and Infinite seem to indicate a lack of basic reading comprehension on your part.Hahah jesus christ ... what is this?
You have to distinguish the fucking proper gang name to mock gang culture now ... ? Because otherwise it's mocking black people.
You do realise your saying all black people wear the same urban clothes and act like they are in a gang. To me that is the most racist statement in this thread by far.
In England there are so many dress as "chav" parties. Would you consider ripping into this subculture offensive as well ?
.
This very lame party is hardly worth national attention. If this were a Howard University frat doing a prohibition-era Italian gangster party, I don't think anyone would care - because nobody should care. I don't frankly know what their motivations or internal thoughts were when planning this minor lapse of racial sensitivity, but a serious national discussion on it is a waste of our collective energy.
This is a discussion board and topics like this come up for discussion purposes. If you don't think it's worthy of discussion, that's fine. But this doesn't add to the discussion people are trying to have at all.Close it down boys!
He never said any of that. No one said any of that. Where are you reading this?Hahah jesus christ ... what is this?
You have to distinguish the fucking proper gang name to mock gang culture now ... ? Because otherwise it's mocking black people.
You do realise your saying all black people wear the same urban clothes and act like they are in a gang. To me that is the most racist statement in this thread by far.
It's the plot of Dear White People, jesus fuck SAE's recruits THEE most remedial mofos they can find.
This is a discussion board and topics like this come up for discussion purposes. If you don't think it's worthy of discussion, that's fine. But this doesn't add to the discussion people are trying to have at all.
Literally didn't say that. God, these threads can be so annoying when people just hear (or read) what they want. If you read what was typed I clearly said that people have an issue with it because it's conflating urban culture and the inner cities with gangs. It's a hilariously bad and juvenile. There's nothing in the pic that's really specific to any known street gang. A tupac shirt? Loose fitting clothes? a sports jersey? Yeah man I totally recognize that gang.I'm having a really hard time getting upset about this.
This is the issue? They didn't portray crips/bloods well enough?
That's a little bit of a stretch. It's definitely not a bad thing to be talking about this and I'd say the discussion we're having right now is proof of it.My intent was to comment on the coverage this story is receiving and how as an entire culture we are dumber for deluding the idea of what truly is a controversy. I think it's a point that adds to the discussion.
This very lame party is hardly worth national attention. If this were a Howard University frat doing a prohibition-era Italian gangster party, I don't think anyone would care - because nobody should care. I don't frankly know what their motivations or internal thoughts were when planning this minor lapse of racial sensitivity, but a serious national discussion on it is a waste of our collective energy.
Literally didn't say that. God, these threads can be so annoying when people just hear (or read) what they want. If you read what was typed I clearly said that people have an issue with it because it's conflating urban culture and the inner cities with gangs. It's a hilariously bad and juvenile. There's nothing in the pic that's really specific to any known street gang. A tupac shirt? Loose fitting clothes? a sports jersey? Yeah man I totally recognize that gang.
What outrage?So blame any litany of social issues for why suburban youth conflates urban culture for gangs. Searching for apparent outward racism here is futile. The outrage here is just a tad overblown.
What outrage?
If this were a Howard University frat doing a prohibition-era Italian gangster party, I don't think anyone would care
Ok but how is anything that I said discussing the disproportionate to the offense committed in your opinion. How is not talking about this solves anything or works to improve perception? Why does this have to be "overt racism" for me to take issue with it? Where are the pitchforks and torches in this neogaf dot com thread?Getting national attention? Showing up on a thread on GAF?
Lol, and people complaining about the "Dear White People" trailer being too preachy.
And yes, "Social Probation" is now the most obnoxious expression that privileged people say, move over "Overly PC".
Ok but how is anything that I said discussing the disproportionate to the offense committed in your opinion. How is not talking about this solves anything or works to improve perception? Why does this have to be "overt racism" for me to take issue with it? Where are the pitchforks and torches in this neogaf dot com thread?