Support NeoGAF

[Fafalada]

Xbox also supports Xess that is in the market for ~4 years but no game on it is using it.

Last I looked XeSS was still closed source (no matter what Intel says about it) so saying 'XBox supports it' is akin to saying XBox supports DLSS. Unless the vendor decides to port it - it doesn't, and developers aren't the ones to point fingers at here as there's f-all they can do.

What AMD is doing is a whole different story obviously - but that one (assuming hw isn't limiting in ways people don't understand - which could still be the case) I'd put more on MS not giving a damn about XSX (definitely not devs either). As I doubt AMD would stop them if they actually you know - tried.

 

[Bojji]

Last I looked XeSS was still closed source (no matter what Intel says about it) so saying 'XBox supports it' is akin to saying XBox supports DLSS. Unless the vendor decides to port it - it doesn't, and developers aren't the ones to point fingers at here as there's f-all they can do.

What AMD is doing is a whole different story obviously - but that one (assuming hw isn't limiting in ways people don't understand - which could still be the case) I'd put more on MS not giving a damn about XSX (definitely not devs either). As I doubt AMD would stop them if they actually you know - tried.

MS could make some deal with Intel, I doubt Intel would be very upset that their tech is promoted in more games.

 

[MisterXDTV]

It's hilarious we are still talking about this

Reality is FSR4 is unsupported on RDNA2 and 3

Hacked DLLs files or emulation don't mean shit

Considering a whole year has passed, it's a dead matter at this point

 

[Panajev2001a]

Xbox also supports Xess that is on the market for ~4 years but no game on it is using it. I think reasons are more political then technical, and developers in general don't give a fuck about Xbox.

Supports but no game uses it… same thing for RDNA4. Is it possible that it might not be as easy as it might appear to be? Again, AMD is held up to a standards that will do them no good, but it is also their fault as I said (sold RDNA2 for too long for example).

 

[Bojji]

Supports but no game uses it… same thing for RDNA4. Is it possible that it might not be as easy as it might appear to be? Again, AMD is held up to a standards that will do them no good, but it is also their fault as I said (sold RDNA2 for too long for example).

What? RDNA2 is 2020 architecture, Turing that is still fully supported - 2018. AMD also completely abandoned RDNA1 from 2019.

AMD was the one with "fine wine" and "FSR2 works on all GPUs" approach. But suddenly, with RDNA4 they completely forgot about that and started making super dumb, anti consumer decisions.

It's hilarious we are still talking about this

Reality is FSR4 is unsupported on RDNA2 and 3

Hacked DLLs files or emulation don't mean shit

Considering a whole year has passed, it's a dead matter at this point

Officially unsupported, hardware runs it just fine. This "hacked dll" was published by AMD...

 

[winjer]

Supports but no game uses it… same thing for RDNA4. Is it possible that it might not be as easy as it might appear to be? Again, AMD is held up to a standards that will do them no good, but it is also their fault as I said (sold RDNA2 for too long for example).

The problem is that the best oficially supported upscaler in AMD's RDNA2 and RDNA3 is Intel's XeSS.
It's just ridiculous that Intel is doing more to support RDNA2 than AMD.

The worst part is that the new compiled FSR4 Int8 dll, 4.0.2b, fixed some bugs that caused performance issues in RDNA2, which means that it's performance is now almost on par with XeSS Dp4A, while looking better.
So it's the modders and Intel that are taking up the slack, while AMD is doing nothing at all.