• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FTC Seeks to Block Microsoft Corp’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard

EMR

EMR

Member
Pelta88 said:
Almost on que... I present the Jez dumb take...

Click to expand...

CarefulFrequentDrafthorse-size_restricted.gif
 
graywolf323

graywolf323

Member
DeepEnigma said:
That’s the funny part. You have two very conflicting reasons why it’s not releasing for PlayStation from the same camp.

> third party publisher who has been publishing all their games the last 3 gens on almost every platform, especially where they sold the most on recently, was never going to publish this on PlayStation.

> Sony tried getting exclusive rights, wether outright or timed, that’s why MS was forced to buy them.

Honk honk.
Click to expand...
often you get both from the same exact users even because they're just so far down the rabbit hole at this point they wouldn't know a logical thought if it slapped them across the face
 
begotten

begotten

Member
Hendrick's said:
The fact all these organizations are parroting Sony lies makes it evident that MS will use examples of Sony tactics to fight this being that they are the market leader.
Click to expand...
Hendrick's said:
You guys are the delusional ones. Plenty of evidence Sony is both anti-competitive and anti-consumer. Stay tuned. As Brad Smith said, MS is going to war.
Click to expand...

No wonder why you usually react to posts that either validate you or don't.

You talk like a clueless baboon otherwise.
 
ZehDon

ZehDon

Member
Swift_Star said:
It has been since you made a blank statement without any proof to it. Next time don’t acuse other of something you have only pure conjecture to back your point up.
Click to expand...
Conjecture - being publicly made statements by the FTCs head literally saying they'll actively seek to pursue legal actions that they themselves admit are not enforceable by the anti-trust law they're attempting to invoke? Might need to actually look up the words your'e using. There's a reason their probe into Amazon's MGM buyout failed. It's the same reason this attempt will fail: they're enforcing the FTC's head's ideological opposition to "big tech", as opposed to enforcing their own legal precedent and anti-trust laws.

gothmog said:
Okay, so in your opinion what specific laws are they not following?
Click to expand...
I might not have been clear: the FTC isn't going against "a law", they're simply not acting within "the law". The FTC's job is, essentially, to ensure fair trade. Microsoft's deal doesn't really impinge on this. The FTC's anti-trust claims will be slapped down because the FTC has allowed M&A bigger than this previously in other industries, and there is no specific law that says "big tech can't buy companies". Microsoft has already worked to undermine monopolistic claims with its Nintendo deal and offerings to Sony, and the numbers after the purchase don't add up to Microsoft being able to foreclose a single competitor in any industry. In fact, it won't even supplant its competitors - it'll simply be able to close the 2:1 gap in the video game industry that Sony established last generation, and close in on Nintendo and Sony - both of whom will remain bigger players. This actually means more competition, not less. The FTC's job isn't to stop "big tech" from diversifying, just like the CMA's job isn't to protect Sony's business interests. The FTC is making noise because it's head has taken a public "anti-big tech" stand, not because Microsoft has breached a law or regulation.
 
Last edited:
bentanchorbolt

bentanchorbolt

Banned
FUBARx89 said:
The same rights they had in the 360 days? Of timed exclusives dlc (30 days), marketing rights etc.
Click to expand...
Don Mattrick.

Xbox was a killer disrupter of a console, giving gamers of the era yet another box with games. During the 360 era they released a lot of in-house killer games and tied up good marketing deals with 3rd party devs, but something happened around the time of the Xbox One release, its like they just forgot how they got in this position. Fuck up and after fuck up to give Sony a head start, and not following up and delivering with real killer titles on a fast enough basis.
 
B

BiohazardX95

Member
Hendrick's said:
The fact all these organizations are parroting Sony lies makes it evident that MS will use examples of Sony tactics to fight this being that they are the market leader.
Click to expand...
Guess what, most of Sony console sales are because people want to play the latest call of duty in there, that or fortnite or FIFA. Not everyone purchases Sony exclusives.
 
Salz01

Salz01

Member
At this point I just want it all to be over, so that Sony can have the Playsation Studios show case to finally show the goods…
 
Ezekiel_

Ezekiel_

Banned
ZehDon said:
Conjecture - being publicly made statements by the FTCs head literally saying they'll actively seek to pursue legal actions that they themselves admit are not enforceable by the anti-trust law they're attempting to invoke? Might need to actually look up the words your'e using. There's a reason their probe into Amazon's MGM buyout failed. It's the same reason this attempt will fail: they're enforcing the FTC's head's ideological opposition to "big tech", as opposed to enforcing their own legal precedent and anti-trust laws.


I might not have been clear: the FTC isn't going against "a law", they're simply not acting within "the law". The FTC's job is, essentially, to ensure fair trade. Microsoft's deal doesn't really impinge on this. The FTC's anti-trust claims will be slapped down because the FTC has allowed M&A bigger than this previously in other industries, and there is no specific law that says "big tech can't buy companies". Microsoft has already worked to undermine monopolistic claims with its Nintendo deal and offerings to Sony, and the numbers after the purchase don't add up to Microsoft being able to foreclose a single competitor in any industry. In fact, it won't even supplant its competitors - it'll simply be able to close the 2:1 gap in the video game industry that Sony established last generation, and close in on Nintendo and Sony - both of whom will remain bigger players. This actually means more competition, not less. The FTC's job isn't to stop "big tech" from diversifying, just like the CMA's job isn't to protect Sony's business interests. The FTC is making noise because it's head has taken a public "anti-big tech" stand, not because Microsoft has breached a law or regulation.
Click to expand...
If no precedent exists, then this is a great opportunity for it!
 
Last edited:
BennyBlanco

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
bentanchorbolt said:
Don Mattrick.

Xbox was a killer disrupter of a console, giving gamers of the era yet another box with games. During the 360 era they released a lot of in-house killer games and tied up good marketing deals with 3rd party devs, but something happened around the time of the Xbox One release, its like they just forgot how they got in this position. Fuck up and after fuck up to give Sony a head start, and not following up and delivering with real killer titles on a fast enough basis.
Click to expand...

Xbox One early on had interesting games. Killer Instinct, Titanfall, Sunset Overdrive, Ori…. They just stopped doing deals for exclusives at some point.
 
Lucifers Beard

Lucifers Beard

Member
interesting. Can’t see that happening anymore. Oh well, it’s not the end of the world, it’s not like those games won’t be available on Xbox. Although it would be entertaining if Jim tried to money hat the next COD as an exclusive to PS5!

Anyway, whatever. Xbox apparently have a lot coming out next year. It’s not like we’ll be starved for games. Too many as it is.
 
gothmog

gothmog

Gold Member
ZehDon said:
I might not have been clear: the FTC isn't going against "a law", they're simply not acting within "the law". The FTC's job is, essentially, to ensure fair trade. Microsoft's deal doesn't really impinge on this. The FTC's anti-trust claims will be slapped down because the FTC has allowed M&A bigger than this previously in other industries, and there is no specific law that says "big tech can't buy companies". Microsoft has already worked to undermine monopolistic claims with its Nintendo deal and offerings to Sony, and the numbers after the purchase don't add up to Microsoft being able to foreclose a single competitor in any industry. In fact, it won't even supplant its competitors - it'll simply be able to close the 2:1 gap in the video game industry that Sony established last generation, and close in on Nintendo and Sony - both of whom will remain bigger players. This actually means more competition, not less. The FTC's job isn't to stop "big tech" from diversifying, just like the CMA's job isn't to protect Sony's business interests. The FTC is making noise because it's head has taken a public "anti-big tech" stand, not because Microsoft has breached a law or regulation.
Click to expand...
FTC is about protecting markets. The only controverisial part about what they are doing now is that they are trying to also protect emerging and poorly defined markets as well. There are plenty of places where the FTC could have stepped in and stopped companies like Facebook from acquiring every potential competitor. They are literally trying to predict the future with past data.

Based on that definition, I thought they made their case well in the summary I read. Microsoft has a documented history of abusing their position. Microsoft bought another large publisher. Microsoft did the thing they are saying they will not do already with the other publisher. Therefore, they are likely to do the same thing with this deal no matter what they say.

That whole FTC is here to prevent monopolies only is a myth. There are cases they cite themselves in some of their guidance where they have sued successfully to block acquisitions where the combined market share of the combined company was less than 30%. It's all about the force multiplier of the acquisition more than the actual market share. Especially in these emerging markets.
 
The Alien

The Alien

Banned
Deal will happen. It was always tracking to a early/they are.

While this may be a bump in the road, big tech money buys big tech lawyers (and politicians). The FTC was using this to look tough on tech while actually continuing to be the limp dicks they are.

Likely outcome will weigh even more heavily in favor of Microsoft. Any concessions would be a settlement. I think they'll go for the gusto.
 
M

MisterXDTV

Member
The Alien said:
Deal will happen. It was always tracking to a early/they are.

While this may be a bump in the road, big tech money buys big tech lawyers (and politicians). The FTC was using this to look tough on tech while actually continuing to be the limp dicks they are.

Likely outcome will weigh even more heavily in favor of Microsoft. Any concessions would be a settlement. I think they'll go for the gusto.
Click to expand...

Phil, is that you?
 
Dick Jones

Dick Jones

Gold Member
3liteDragon said:


Well, looks like we know the outcome for this deal.
finance.yahoo.com

Microsoft-Activision merger: ‘I think this deal closes,’ analyst says

Wedbush Securities Analyst Michael Pachter joins Yahoo Finance Live to discuss Activision Blizzard earnings, the Microsoft-Activision merger, slowing game engagement, and the outlook for the gaming industry.
finance.yahoo.com finance.yahoo.com
Click to expand...

Microsoft never stood a chance when Pachter ruled in their favour. At least a stopped clock is right twice a day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The FTC’s noncompete agreements ban is blocked
News
1
745
GHG replied
  • Locked
FTC accuses Microsoft of misrepresenting its Activision Blizzard plans after layoffs
News
12
1K
ChuckeRearmed replied
Microsoft has settled its Antitrust Gamers Lawsuit Over $69B Activision Blizzard Buy.
News
26
2K
DenchDeckard replied
FTC appeals to block already-completed Microsoft-Activision deal
2
63
7K
Mythoclast replied
  • Locked
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard accused of 'bad faith bargaining' by Raven Software union workers
News Business
3
519
Topher replied
Top Bottom