Swift_Star
Banned
Best scenario is this falling through and A/B getting sliced into chunks and being sold to several parties.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
FTC Seeks to Block Microsoft Corp’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard
- Thread starter kyliethicc
- Start date
3liteDragon
Member
SEC regulates the markets & their job is to protect investors, so things like individuals or companies buying shares in another company (among A BUNCH of other things) will have to be filed with the SEC. FTC’s role is to protect consumers by enforcing antitrust law on companies. I’m most definitely oversimplifying it but that’s my brief description for you.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
It is, it really is.
Their (FTC) arguments are flimsy at best and I'm looking forward to the court proceedings and them losing yet again.
DeaDPo0L84
Member
Ohhhhh okay, was confused cause didn't see anyone in your guys conversation mention Eva, carryon.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Everyone who's been to the big porn sites knows who that little Russian thottie is.OMG. I didn't know anyone else knew Eva. She is. Been following her for a couple years now.
Kvally
Member
I can see that. I saw his avatar and went bat shit crazy off topic. Sorry!
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Microsoft Didn't Lie to the EU on ZeniMax Deal Like the FTC Said, According to Sources
A new report says that Microsoft did not lie about the future exclusivity of ZeniMax games to the EU like the FTC had suggested yesterday.
The FTC claimed Microsoft misled the EU, it appears the FTC was wrong.
In its recent filing against Microsoft the FTC claimed that the company misled EU regulators over its earlier acquisition of ZeniMax. Now the EU is telling the publication MLex that the FTC’s complaint is wrong. The EU apparently never asked Microsoft to guarantee ZeniMax games be available on...
www.theverge.com
MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now
Last edited:
Chiggs
Gold Member
With what I've read so far, the merit of it does appear to be...questionable. The problem is that Phil Spencer has bungled this whole thing and he has been insincere, so who knows what other sort of dirt will come out--and that goes for Sony too. You had better believe MS is going to attempt to smear them as much as possible.
What's really hilarious is that this acquisition has a very real chance of making it all the way up to SCOTUS if MS loses the initial trial and then the appeal. That's crazy.
MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now
Humiliating.
Last edited:
bentanchorbolt
Banned
Yes and no. If the deal falls through and Sony, MS, EA, Amazon, etc --- all end up with pieces, seems like the end result would be much worse for consumers.
I don't want to make MS out to be the good guys here or the savior, because at the end of the day their goal is to make money and if that means cutting others out down the road, they will do that -- they are responsible to the shareholders and not to the consumers, and when those two things align is when everyone wins but its not often. But having said that, ABK is getting sold regardless, to someone, either in whole or in pieces, and I don't really see the alternative to MS buying them being a more friendly outcome.
Ezekiel_
Banned
Hummmm... Who is this 'watchdog'?
The rest of the article pictures are in this link
[/URL][/URL]
Please feel free to stop any time.
NickFire
Member
You do such a good job with the recaps, but don't do this. It literally sources the same post on the other place. And also says:[/URL]
[/URL]
MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now
"Nonetheless, we've contacted the European Union to receive an official confirmation on the statement and will update this story if we hear back."
Posting different sites all sourcing a message board post creates an impression without a foundation. Let's wait for someone to report an official response from the EU.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Yes I know, just pointing that more mainstream websites have also picked this up. Which will prompt more info on this.
However I don't know, or expect, EU to make a formal press release any time soon.
They'll probably only reply to similar inquiries and those will similarly be not accepted because it's not in PDF or something I guess.
Hummmm... Who is this 'watchdog'?
The EU Commission *is* the watch dog (courtesy of
ReBurn
)
Though in need of reform, the watchdog is still watching
The Commission remains guardian of the treaties, but oversight rules must be reconsidered.
www.politico.eu
Last edited:
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
Kloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.Microsoft Didn't Lie to the EU on ZeniMax Deal Like the FTC Said, According to Sources
A new report says that Microsoft did not lie about the future exclusivity of ZeniMax games to the EU like the FTC had suggested yesterday.wccftech.com
The FTC claimed Microsoft misled the EU, it appears the FTC was wrong.
In its recent filing against Microsoft the FTC claimed that the company misled EU regulators over its earlier acquisition of ZeniMax. Now the EU is telling the publication MLex that the FTC’s complaint is wrong. The EU apparently never asked Microsoft to guarantee ZeniMax games be available on...
MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now
FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:
Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.
EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).
But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.
Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
The news didn't originate with Klobberingtime or whatever his name is.
It's from MLex, a decidedly not twitter-fanboy website.
graywolf323
Member
you might wanna go look in a mirror there
My brain after reading that comment.
I swear some of you guys. How do you make shit up like this.
These big corporations are living rent free in your head, brainwashed.
They laugh on people posting shit like this while collecting their money.
don't bother, he lives up to his tagKloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.
FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:
Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.
EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).
But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.
Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
And they said they currently don't have official confirmation. Their words as well.
Swift_Star
Banned
Like I said, this is all a reply to an e-mail we have no access to because the sender haven't disclosed what they asked. It definitely has no relevance whatsoever.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Yep. Without context of the question, this is just a soothing response padding for their nervous clients. We are going to see a lot of warfare like this over the next 6-8 months. Some genuine, and a whole lot of BS as well.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Agreed.
Ronin_7
Member
Good post.Kloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.
FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:
Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.
EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).
But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.
Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
The_Mike
I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Can you tell why, or are we just edgy today?
gothmog
Gold Member
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.
0neAnd0nly
Member
The FTC vs. MS, 2022 - Colorized
OsirisBlack
Banned
Never heard of this guy before I'm 50 minutes in. There is some twisting of the law and a lot of personal opinion and bias in his delivery. I deal with lawyers every day, they are generally right to the point and not this ..... opinionated.
Captain Toad
Banned
The only slice anyone cares about is the one that includes Call of Duty. That slice is 95% of the pizza.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
He used to be like that, but now he's high on his own supply. Appeared on Xbox podcasts and the like.
He now has a niche he is capitalizing on. Ironic to say the least.
Thirty7ven
Banned
Nokia came to mind instantly.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
OsirisBlack
Banned
Thank you for the info had no idea.
Gavon West
Spread's Cheeks for Intrusive Ads
Not going to happen. Sorry not sorry. The contract states that they will keep current games on competitors platforms, and keep those games available for purchase. They've kept to it. New IP is on a case by case basis. No way they put new Bethesda games on competing platforms.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Last edited:
I think most Microsoft fans just assumed there would be more ways to be successful in the industry. Clearly regulators disagree and feel that the way Sony does business is the way it should be allowed to be done. That is the most interesting part of this situation imo.
Last edited:
Gavon West
Spread's Cheeks for Intrusive Ads
ABK was on sale for TWO YEARS!! Sony and no one else stepped up. What else needs be said?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
MS made them an initial offer, Activision refused it, *they* wanted to sell to fucking META (Facebook).
MS then made them a second offer which they accepted.
It's the "MS having shadow-bought Crystal Dynamics and have them only with Embracer by name only" category XD
Last edited:
TheGodfather07
Member
I just want this shit to end. Don't care which way it goes.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
No, this is lobbyists that once held a career political position and now sit on board of directors for mega corps and vise versa territory.
BattleScar
Member
Why are people angry that another massive Merger and Acquisition might get blocked? Why are people angry that market consolidation might be avoided?
Why?
Why is this even a stance? Are people's affinity to plastic boxes that play games that powerful, that they must throw consumer interests in the bin so their corporate overlord can get a W?
Why is it that Microsoft buying ABK a good thing, just because people with GamePass get more games? What about people who use PS++? What about those subscribers? Why does Microsoft need to be the one to control which subscription services get what?
Why?
Why is this even a stance? Are people's affinity to plastic boxes that play games that powerful, that they must throw consumer interests in the bin so their corporate overlord can get a W?
Why is it that Microsoft buying ABK a good thing, just because people with GamePass get more games? What about people who use PS++? What about those subscribers? Why does Microsoft need to be the one to control which subscription services get what?
Unknown Soldier
Member
25 pages in a day, huh?
Nice to see GAF so alive I guess.
Nice to see GAF so alive I guess.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
No, this is lobbyists that once held a career political position and now sit on board of directors for mega corps and vise versa territory.
It would have to be a real long con for that to be true lol. I think it's just straight up tinfoil hat stuff.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Hey, for once I agree with that man-child. Just not for the same reasons.
Bo_Hazem
Banned
Facts matter. There is no reason to even suspect that the choice will be taken away from anybody. There are many reasons to be sure that a lot of new people will have access to COD.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Okay Ryan, it's time to stop posting.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
And downsize then outsource like a mofo when done in the States. Based on your quote from the statement.We found MS's first character witness for the trial
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked