sendit
Member
Straight up denial at this point. Its not happening bud.Still gonna happen.
Straight up denial at this point. Its not happening bud.Still gonna happen.
The answer for that is in the very same document itself.
Exclusivity would be profitable only if it led to an increase in the number of users and console sales.
I think TES VI, Starfield (and Redfall to a lesser extent) will very easily meet this criteria.
What about Kratos voice actor Christopher Judge?
So.. a cult.Just in case it isn't known or any of you aren't on twitter. Jez and those of his ilk operate in a bubble. They block anyone who anyone with an objective opinion.
if all it takes is a new IP to meet that criteria, then it wasn't an “implausible” condition like Microsoft said it was
They gotta be resetera modsJust in case it isn't known or any of you aren't on twitter. Jez and those of his ilk operate in a bubble. They block anyone who anyone with an objective opinion.
Straight up denial at this point. Its not happening bud.
Not at all. I’ve seen how this works enough with other deals, far more important than this one.Straight up denial at this point. Its not happening bud.
I still think it still might happen, but the FTC will forbid them to make exclusive games.Straight up denial at this point. Its not happening bud.
I do not like to argue about this as I do not have the knowledge or depth enough to talk about it. but MS buying probably one if not the biggest US 3rd party company in the world for what is worth more than Sony corp as a whole (or close to) IS buying the industry.Nvidia was actually buying the industry, Microsoft isn't.
If there's grounds to stop this it would be based entirely on how many consoles sales from competiors are impacted. Sony can end the deal right now by publically listing the numbers they showed under the table, about how much they depend on COD for revenue, bleeding to other game sales on their platform, and how many consoles moved because of COD that would be lost.
If they do it publicly, than people can put that data into context for the regulators who may not (and likely not) understand the industry in depth. The fact Sony won't do this and instead did it under the table is confusing because they don't lose anything. They lose nothing.
I do not think there is a difference here. They are blocking it first without suing. if MS doesn't agree ( which they are not ), it will go to court. That is what I understood anyway.Its going to go through, because FTC isnt actually suing them to block it, but to get concession.
I hoped it will die, but so far, MS is using the market to their advantage. Which indicates a pass.
I dont like big corporation purchase, but this will get pretty ugly for us gamers.
Summed it up nicelyI think most that were "cheerleading" this were doing so because:
- They want more AAA games added to their Game Pass subscription because it saves them a ton of money over having to buy $70 MSRP games
- They're a Nintendo-first player and were excited to see Call of Duty games coming to their platform of choice
- They don't want to see Activision Blizzard acquired by the likes of Tencent or Amazon
- They want more competition in an industry where Sony can raise prices on games, raise prices on consoles, raise prices on accessories, charge for enhancements for PS4 titles on PS5, etc.. etc.. with no penalty or loss of sales
- They want shitheel CEOs like Bobby Kotick out of the industry
There are plenty of people that perfectly reasonably see this acquisition as truly good for the industry and good for their own self interests. It's not just console warring.
Source?So, the FTC is plowing ahead with their ideological opposition under their young leadership. I look forward to watching their case fall apart in court, where they’ll learn that just because you don’t like something, doesn’t make it illegal.
Phase is expected because this deal is $68b.Nah, phase 2 usually means it's dead. People don't like to hear the true these days it hurts.
They already made comments when all this drama started, chest pounding that they weren't going to stop at Zeni and ABK. People cringe as fuck called them "gangsta."
So.. a cult.
They gotta be resetera mods
Call of Duty regularly tops sales charts and has sold almost 10 billion dollars in total revenue.
I do not like to argue about this as I do not have the knowledge or depth enough to talk about it. but MS buying probably one if not the biggest US 3rd party company in the world for what is worth more than Sony corp as a whole (or close to) IS buying the industry.
A source for my opinion of the FTCs behaviour?Source?
Right.....and i'm the Queen of England. Point in case, a deal worth less than the Activision-Blizzard merge.Not at all. I’ve seen how this works enough with other deals, far more important than this one.
Oh lord., this is pathetic.So, the FTC is plowing ahead with their ideological opposition under their young leadership. I look forward to watching their case fall apart in court, where they’ll learn that just because you don’t like something, doesn’t make it illegal.
Yes. What's your source on them being "ideological"?A source for my opinion of the FTCs behaviour?
A source for my opinion of the FTCs behaviour?
Pay very close to the politics of this going forward. The FTC has just entered into a big fight with Microsoft and one of the United States' most powerful Labor Unions with a very pro union President and Administration.
If the FTC hoped Microsoft would blink.. that has not happened. This isn't Nvidia they're dealing with.
The FTC's job is to protect consumers, not competitors. The FTC better pray they at least get a judge that will have a temperament for this silly case, or else it could be over for the FTC a lot quicker than people think.
Activision is the largest videogame publisher not only in the US, but in the word. ZeniMax was also one of the largest publishers in the US and world. This was bound to happen on those merits alone.And is one of the many big hit games (excluding exclusives) it's not comparable to Nvidia buying what OTHER COMPETITORS US IN THE INDUSTRY TO EVEN HAVE A BUSINESS at all.
Also mixing up Activisions market cap with the gaming industries annual gaming revenue is weird, and that's not how business works at all.
We have a King nowRight.....and i'm the Queen of England
What other deal is close to this one?Not at all. I’ve seen how this works enough with other deals, far more important than this one.
Activision is the largest publisher not only in the US, but in the word. ZeniMax was also one of the largest publishers. This was bound to happen on those merits alone.
The price point is enough. That is not normal.Activision is the largest videogame publisher not only in the US, but in the word. ZeniMax was also one of the largest publishers in the US and world. This was bound to happen on those merits alone.
Apologies, that was incredibly insensitive of me. Blame Jim Ryan.We have a King now
It has plenty to do with it. Since they made these comments a short bit ago too...Oooook, none of that has to do with the wrongful claim that MS buying Activision is buying the gaming industry comparable to Nividia buying ARM, when many competitors or market participants needed ARM to even be in business.
Right.....and i'm the Queen of England. Point in case, a deal worth less than the Activision-Blizzard merge.
Nvidia announces arm merge:
NVIDIA to Acquire Arm for $40 Billion, Creating World’s Premier Computing Company for the Age of AI
NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Corp. today announced a definitive agreement under which NVIDIA will acquire Arm Limited from SBG and the SoftBank Vision Fund in a transaction valued at $40 billion.nvidianews.nvidia.com
FTC sues to block merge:
FTC sues to block big semiconductor chip industry merger between Nvidia and Arm
The regulator says the deal would give the combined company too much power, hurt competition and raise prices for consumers. It comes as a global shortage of chips wreaks havoc on the economy.www.npr.org
Nvidia cancels arm merge:
Nvidia calls off its efforts to acquire Arm | TechCrunch
Nvidia has walked away from its deal to acquire Arm from SoftBank.techcrunch.com
I genuinely think that it does. Pretty obviously too. Thats the only reason I'd prefer it goes through. I barely even play these games personally.People need to stop with the "it's for the gamers" bs. It benefits Microsoft and its ecosystem and hurts PS gamers.
MS can do whatever they want if this deal goes through, but don't lie and say this benefits the gamers.
This one however I am still salty about:Right.....and i'm the Queen of England. Point in case, a deal worth less than the Activision-Blizzard merge.
Nvidia announces arm merge:
NVIDIA to Acquire Arm for $40 Billion, Creating World’s Premier Computing Company for the Age of AI
NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Corp. today announced a definitive agreement under which NVIDIA will acquire Arm Limited from SBG and the SoftBank Vision Fund in a transaction valued at $40 billion.nvidianews.nvidia.com
FTC sues to block merge:
FTC sues to block big semiconductor chip industry merger between Nvidia and Arm
The regulator says the deal would give the combined company too much power, hurt competition and raise prices for consumers. It comes as a global shortage of chips wreaks havoc on the economy.www.npr.org
Nvidia cancels arm merge:
Nvidia calls off its efforts to acquire Arm | TechCrunch
Nvidia has walked away from its deal to acquire Arm from SoftBank.techcrunch.com
Like a 343i....NO like a Turn10 YES......Xbox have alot of money from Microsoft
How about they start making more of their own studios like 343 and Turn 10
I want Activision Blizzard remain multiplatform
It has plenty to do with it. Since they made these comments a short bit ago too...
[/URL][/URL]
100% sure they are pretending.People need to stop with the "it's for the gamers" bs.
It has plenty to do with it. Since they made these comments a short bit ago too...
[/URL]
Hubris when allowed to operate unfettered.There are people here who actually think this guy is a genius.....
How stupid do you have to be to make a statement like that while waiting for approval on a $70 billion deal???
I mean, just shut up!!!
Microsoft
Pick one. Because MS isnt pro gamers, They are pro profit.benefits the gamers