Really off topic but this is the most based scene to come out of coal country:
Really off topic but this is the most based scene to come out of coal country:
Close, I think the wife actually helps him come around and respect what the son is doing but it’s been a looooong time since I read the book or watched the movie.just watching the intro I can tell the Dad is really disapointed with his son but will come around towards the end of the film. also his wife is dead.
Close, I think the wife actually helps him come around and respect what the son is doing but it’s been a looooong time since I read the book or watched the movie.
I think it's more about the fact, that he was kind of an ass about it.Wow, was the dude banned just for questioning the validity of the report?
That's too bad, I was actually curious about what he's saying. Never hurts to be a bit skeptical about this kind of news.
No gold.....YET!Yeah he/she/it raised some interesting points, but the passive-aggressiveness/abrasiveness was super unnecessary. And directed at EL no less - tantamount to account suicide but without the sweet gold and hilarity.
You can always try conspiracytheories.com for the latest intel.That's too bad, I was actually curious about what he's saying. Never hurts to be a bit skeptical about this kind of news.
Did this guy get banned for questioning fusion?
Get this fission head outta here.
During World War II, we crafted the Manhattan Project for a timely result. The challenges facing the world today are even greater than at that time. We must double down and accelerate the research to explore new pathways for the clean, limitless energy that fusion promises.”
Musk is too busy with Twitter, hafta wait till 2924Throw $1trillion and 1million scientists at it and let's get this fast tracked by the end of Q3 2023.
ooooooooooh okay
Really off topic but this is the most based scene to come out of coal country:
Is this the Anakin/Padme meme in written form?
There's some discussion about this over at /r/fusion:That's too bad, I was actually curious about what he's saying. Never hurts to be a bit skeptical about this kind of news.
Yes but from the comments on reddit it sounds like the lasers used in the test are really old and inefficient so current tech would reduce that required energy. Still not a net positive output when compared to input, but much closer.Awesome. I presume that this is saying that the energy hiting the target is less than the energy output from that.
So what is needed to take the energy output and turn that back around to drive the lasers
This happens with literally every science thing and has for as long as I can remember. What's exciting to specialized scientists is really usually not all that exciting for your average person.It is an impressive achievement, and no doubt they will do real research off the back of it. What I question the most is the media reporting of it as if this means the US is only a few years away from commercial fusion power.
Breakdown from the scientist.
You are welcome, sir.This guy is awesome. Great summary and thanks for sharing.
i'm not an expert but i don't think that's how it would work. at least i don't think the lasers would turn off. i think they would stay on but the energy required to create fusion would be significantly less than what is generates.So is the goal to have the fusion ignition become self sustaining? Like you turn the lasers off and it keeps fusing? How does this translate into boiling water to turn a turbine?
The lasers would stay on, but the power required to run the lasers would be less than the power generated by the fusion.So is the goal to have the fusion ignition become self sustaining? Like you turn the lasers off and it keeps fusing? How does this translate into boiling water to turn a turbine?
summed up what i was trying to say and in a lot less wordsThe lasers would stay on, but the power required to run the lasers would be less than the power generated by the fusion.
Looking forward to when they invent the Epstein Drive.The lasers would stay on, but the power required to run the lasers would be less than the power generated by the fusion.
Can someone explain why the banned user was wrong? I never saw any rebuttals (maybe I missed them), just piss taking. He wasn't the most cordial with it, but it wasn't devolving into ad hominem and seemed like a good opportunity to explain to him and anyone else reading where and why what he said wasn't correct. Are media outlets misrepresenting the facts?
III. Moderation Policy
A. Moderation of NeoGAF is not by democracy. All decisions with regards to thread closure and movement, permanent and temporary bans, membership, and any other relevant issues are made by the NeoGAF administration alone and are final. That being said, constructive criticisms and suggestions are welcome, provided they are directed to NeoGAF Administration via e-mail, here. Do not dispute administrative policy or action within the forum itself.
Fission is for losers, right guys?
Email 'em and find out.
I like Soodanim . I'd prefer the guy not get banned or reprimanded for breaking TOS.Fission is for losers, right guys?
So with Fusion that should lower all energy cost. It should lower all cost right.
I think it was more the tone than the data/argument itself.I'm not interested in the ban, rather the subject that was cut short. I haven't gotten round to reading Maiden Voyage 's links yet but it seems like there's some doubt surrounding the claims, and didn't know if that's misunderstanding, misrepresentation, or something else