Krappadizzle
Member
Great book. I bought two copies.
Meant to do it last summer, but Making of the Atomic Bomb just flattened me.![]()
Having read Shark Texts many years ago, that book instantly came to mind when I saw how crazy for the formatting and page layouts are in House of Leaves. I definitely recommend The Raw Shark Texts. From what I remember, the story and conclusion was pretty straightforward and cohesive, which might be different for HoL.Also, anybody who likes the literary aspects of House of Leaves should try The Raw Shark Texts, which is a phenomenal read and also does some fascinating stuff with typesetting and language.
No, I have a very good idea of what the book is about. Just because Zampano's contributions to the text's lopsided volume:content ratio is an intentional stylistic choice doesn't make it worth slogging through when you could just consult a Wiki or something to glean the significant portions.Most people that have read this book and dislike don't understand it. Most people who have read this book and like it don't understand it. I'm not saying it's the end all be all of books or anything, but it all connects together and makes sense and it is all necessary. Anyone who tells you to just read one part is full of crap and has no idea what the book is about.
Seeing people recommend Raw Shark Texts makes me want to ask if I should read House of Leaves given that I absolutely hated Raw Shark Texts.
The formatting stuff in Raw Shark Texts just seemed sompletely stupid to me and seemed more gimicky than having any actual reason in the story to do it.
Fun fact: I was first recommended House of Leaves because my house has this little Alice In Wonderland door in my laundry room.
![]()
It opens onto madness.
![]()
I don't know.Ummm.... are there body bags down there?
I don't know.
Why don't you climb down there and check?
No, I have a very good idea of what the book is about. Just because Zampano's contributions to the text's lopsided volume:content ratio is an intentional stylistic choice doesn't make it worth slogging through when you could just consult a Wiki or something to glean the significant portions.
Worth buying it hardcover remaster ed color edition 32 eur) or just 14 eur paper back is fine?
discussions should flow freely. some of the thematic elements (labyrinth, darkness, mythology, meta-fiction, etc.) will naturally enter into the discussion.Does anyone have some suggested discussion topics for the book? Or should we just leave our discussions free to wander anywhere?
Try your local library!Always wanted to read this. Not sure if I actually own a copy lol. Will try to find it or buy one and join the thread. Time to do a kickstart on my reading habits again. Great thread and great choice.
Try your local library!
There are about 4 different editions of this book right? I'm reading the 2-color 2nd edition.
What about you guys?
I read this one about 8 years ago. The copious amounts of annotations and parallel stories were such a chore to get through, I absolutely loved the actual Navidson record about the shape shifting house though. I might revisit this one just for the hell of it since it's so unique