Candescence
Member
The funny thing is about copyright law is that copyrighting characters/names/specific things is a phenomenon entirely restricted to the USA, according to a legal student I once talked with whose main expertise is copyright law. Everywhere else, copyright just covers actual works, not the ideas contained within. So if you're actually living outside the USA, it's entirely possible to make and sell derivative works, though it is still legally risky and you couldn't sell such works in the US anyway.
Not that there should be this kind of legal ambiguity, I personally think only works themselves (basically, the 'text') should be copyrighted, not characters, names, concepts or ideas. That narrow definition, I think, works better for what copyright is actually supposed to be about, any more is unnecessarily restricting what creative artists can do with existing ideas. The public domain is already being starved as it is. It's not like we're being flooded with crappy stuff based off King Arthur or Robin Hood and the like, it wouldn't open up the floodgates to even more crap on Steam, and the mobile stores have plenty of blatant copyright violating apps already. I think consumers will reward creators who use existing ideas and characters in new and interesting ways as opposed to paying for obvious crap.
I'm not a proponent of unfettered capitalism, but you'd think copyright would be one of the first things proponents of a free market would want to tear down, the hypocritical pricks.
Just wondering, how're you handling attack collisions? Spherecasts each frame of the attack animations?
Not that there should be this kind of legal ambiguity, I personally think only works themselves (basically, the 'text') should be copyrighted, not characters, names, concepts or ideas. That narrow definition, I think, works better for what copyright is actually supposed to be about, any more is unnecessarily restricting what creative artists can do with existing ideas. The public domain is already being starved as it is. It's not like we're being flooded with crappy stuff based off King Arthur or Robin Hood and the like, it wouldn't open up the floodgates to even more crap on Steam, and the mobile stores have plenty of blatant copyright violating apps already. I think consumers will reward creators who use existing ideas and characters in new and interesting ways as opposed to paying for obvious crap.
I'm not a proponent of unfettered capitalism, but you'd think copyright would be one of the first things proponents of a free market would want to tear down, the hypocritical pricks.
(sorry for the messy gif)
Just wondering, how're you handling attack collisions? Spherecasts each frame of the attack animations?