WeAreStarStuff
Member
My girlfriend and I were walking around enjoying the weather this past weekend, and I snapped a photo (with my phone :/ ) of this crazy looking flower:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67771/67771c39c289651385f9838c6610cea66aa531b7" alt="20160117_152731.jpg"
My new lens is a 2.8 17-50 and I'm contemplating getting Sigma's 1.8 18-35 Art lens as my next lens as well instead of Nikon's 85, cause it'd be really narrow on my camera and I don't always have the space for that.
My girlfriend and I were walking around enjoying the weather this past weekend, and I snapped a photo (with my phone :/ ) of this crazy looking flower:
![]()
I don't think I'd be the first person to own both lenses. I already know my dad has both and uses both almost religiously. Granted I am still trying to figure out lenses though. I'll probably figure my next lens out after another few months of shooting. I'm tempted to get Nikon 24-85 F3.5-4.5 or whatever lens as my telephoto lens to replace my 18-105. I'm still contemplating the Nikon 1.8 85mm as well.The Sigma 18-35 gets really good reviews but would be kind of redundant given the lens you just bought covers the exact same focal lengths.
I don't think I'd be the first person to own both lenses. I already know my dad has both and uses both almost religiously.
My only real problem is that I don't really shoot telephoto stuff. I find in my shoots I'm usually pretty close to my subject, unless my subject decides to be dumb and randomly moves far. It might be what I'm comfortable with since my lens really is just a prime and I'm usually pretty close cause of reach reasons. It's more intimate as well. I guess until it gets to the point where I need a wildlife 70-200 length I'm usually good with up close.Well no, you'd be the second obviously![]()
I love that second one, I even faved it on Flickr. I think in one of your pictures your model looked a bit bored. That's more of an observation than anything else. How'd you get the first shot like that?A couple edits from my last photoshoot. I haven't shot much for the past week due to having so much to dig through. I try my best to refine my editing with each main edit, though. I am hoping to do a photoshoot or two this weekend. A friend of mine is trying to get more into voice acting and fashion blogging, so I am going to meet up with him and do some photos.
Celestial Dreaming by Tony F, on Flickr
Asleep In The Fire by Tony F, on Flickr
Shades of Elegance by Tony F, on Flickr
This photo reminds me of an 80s music videos from Bananarama. Looks great.A couple edits from my last photoshoot. I haven't shot much for the past week due to having so much to dig through. I try my best to refine my editing with each main edit, though. I am hoping to do a photoshoot or two this weekend. A friend of mine is trying to get more into voice acting and fashion blogging, so I am going to meet up with him and do some photos.
Asleep In The Fire by Tony F, on Flickr
Definitely not the right place to put this but I figure I'd ask anyway: I just dropped my lens like a foot off the ground and I want to make sure everything is alright inside. It looks fine and the pictures seem normal, how am I to know if the glass inside was unaligned or some other problem? When looking through the viewfinder the view seems to fisheye near the edges of the screen, though its possible it was always like that*...
Take a look at this photo I took right after dropping it. If you look at the parallel lines going down, they seem to curve at the highest and lowest ends of the photo. Did I just fuck up my lens hardcore?
Do you use Lightroom? If you do and the lens has a supported profile in the software, lens correction SHOULD deal with that distortion at the corners - if it can't then it might be screwed. As has been said, the corners on pretty much all wide lenses will show distortion of some description.Take a look at this photo I took right after dropping it. If you look at the paralell lines going down, they seem to curve at the highest and lowest ends of the photo. Did I just fuck up my lens hardcore?
That is a cool shot, great expression on the face of the guy leaning on the taxi.Got to try the Sigma 18-35 yesterday from a friend of mine, so took a walk around the streets to take some pictures, im not a street photographer, but loved how this one looked !
![]()
There's a reason why I want that lens even if it would be a bit redundant focal length wise.Got to try the Sigma 18-35 yesterday from a friend of mine, so took a walk around the streets to take some pictures, im not a street photographer, but loved how this one looked !
![]()
P1170493-1 by anthony tong, on Flickr
P1170489 by anthony tong, on Flickr
PC190312 by anthony tong, on Flickr
PA100594 by anthony tong, on Flickr
Aren't the lens profiles pre-created based on LR testing with the actual lens itself? In theory you could make the necessary adjustments and save as a preset but I'm not sure you'd have access to everything that the lens profile covers.Is there a way in LR to make new lens profiles? It's kind of annoying not having profiles for my 50mm FD lens, which is my most used lens by far.
EDIT: And then save it as a favorite? Because fuck going through that list every time.
I like the flipped reflection shot the most.I had a few days in Malaysia last week... only Kuala Lumpur unfortunately. It was a super nice place and I really enjoyed relaxing there, but it wasn't a very dynamic or inspiring city for street photography. Especially not after Thailand and so many years in China. Here are the best shots I think I got.
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
Kind of a standard Petrona's Tower shot, but you have to shoot this building while there I guess:
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
And a reflection, flipped:
Kuala Lumpur by Eric, on Flickr
Does anyone here think that it would be good to bother with VSCO for more consistent photo batches? I feel like it rubs me the wrong way, and that's mainly because it feel a bit too Instagram like to me.
What do you all think? Worth it?
Also, here is my first photo from a photography project I am working on. I made the logo myself, so, a bit of criticism would be appreciated on both fronts, thanks!
I feel like something is off in the photo, I think it may be the composition and the way it is lined up, though I am not sure.
![]()
I appreciate the advice.dunno why, but the power pole (?) is kinda distracting me, so i removed it (fast and dirty).
if you got the chance (if it's your car) to take the picture again, i would try to take one later that day, when the sun is not so high. i'm not a fan of hard light :/
It definitely looks distorted, but that may just be how it always looked. Wide angle lenses do tend to distort straight lines, especially close up. I'm not sure what focal length that lens is.
Do you use Lightroom? If you do and the lens has a supported profile in the software, lens correction SHOULD deal with that distortion at the corners - if it can't then it might be screwed. As has been said, the corners on pretty much all wide lenses will show distortion of some description.
I appreciate the advice.
I love this image, and I took time to think about using it as a cover photo. The trees and the light post that you mentioned were considered lightly by me, but I just decided to leave it alone. Now that you did the edit, I feel like it would be beneficial to go ahead and take the light post out due to it conflicting with the type.
Also, this isn't my car. I did mini shoot after a car show with someone I met, and I forgot to get their contact information. A friend of mine also mentioned that softer light would help, but that was the condition and timing I was offered that day.
Thanks ��
Also, I think if I were to take out the trees, the background would take a lot of attention from the average viewer. I feel like the trees bring in the composition a bit. I'm a bit torn.
I edited this photo in lightroom to show you the difference when you straighten it up, hope you don't mind. You can see that the light post in your original image looks like it is leaning over. Let me know if you want me to take down the image I edited.
Thanks and don't worry about it, reminded me to do the same as well cause I think I forgot to because I completely forgot where that was after you apply the specific lens profile.I edited this photo in lightroom to show you the difference when you straighten it up, hope you don't mind. You can see that the light post in your original image looks like it is leaning over. Let me know if you want me to take down the image I edited.
Also, here is my first photo from a photography project I am working on. I made the logo myself, so, a bit of criticism would be appreciated on both fronts, thanks!
I feel like something is off in the photo, I think it may be the composition and the way it is lined up, though I am not sure.
![]()
I don't think in all your China pics there were that many pigeons. Eat your pigeons Nepal. I like the three with the kids.
That's because they all wind up in a street side wok.Thanks dude, and there are like no birds in China practically.
That's because they all wind up in a street side wok.
I'm instantly reminded of Curb Your Enthusiasm.
I'm instantly reminded of Curb Your Enthusiasm.
Those are some really nice photos. Very happy to see it in pictures and not have to be in the general vicinity of the volcano myself.Took these on my predawn hike to a viewpoint to see Mt Bromo in Indonesia
http://imgur.com/gallery/5gaHc/new
I'm not the best photographer but thought you guys might enjoy the subject matter...it's not everyday you get to see an erupting volcano.
Magnus Walker
![]()