LaunchpadMcQ
Banned
That sure is a heck of a coincidence right fellas?
Uhm. That's interesting.
That sure is a heck of a coincidence right fellas?
My theory is that they targeted you, but it redirected onto me because of your powerDo we believe this is one of the abilities that is limited to table, though? If so, that precludes Nin from having done that, but it could have been one of his corhorts at Table 2.
My theory is that they targeted you, but it redirected onto me because of your power
Can you elaborate on this a bit? You are saying at least one of them is scum because they are too sensible? There is no room in this game for two sensible persons?
I don't have much of a read on either, but it feels like they're being very safe. Being sensible is nice and all, but when that's my main impression it feels like it could be an act to stay out of the spotlight.
Not going to lie to you Launch, your continued defense and deflection for Fireblend is pretty suspicious. I realize it could be a simple "I really think he is town", but first you tie a vote and then push others to move the vote away from Fireblend, and this on top just seems weird. I already dont really buy the switcher thing; I cant imagine that scum target a seat with their NK, or many other roles for that matter, so an invisible switch before the main switch just seems redundant, but also provides an invisible power to role claim.Burbeting/Fireblend - Frankly, these look like dead ends to me. They read like townies to me. You guys are basically saying your reasoning against them is theyre a little too townie. Im not buying that as solid evidence of anything. I will support a lynch over a no lynch, no matter what, so Ill lynch them if it comes down to the line. Im just not getting a scum read off of either of them.
Terrabyte20xx - My top town at the moment. I think his role claim makes sense and its rather risky, so Ill believe him for now.
Xam... I think you missed the point on the suspicious person is in those posts.VOTE: nin1000
Oh, thanks. Guess we should stop asking questions about them then. Glad we have you launch.Burbeting/Fireblend - Frankly, these look like dead ends to me. They read like townies to me. You guys are basically saying your reasoning against them is theyre a little too townie. Im not buying that as solid evidence of anything. I will support a lynch over a no lynch, no matter what, so Ill lynch them if it comes down to the line. Im just not getting a scum read off of either of them.
It's Time to stopXam... I think you missed the point on the suspicious person is in those posts.
Why would Time reveal his role or his partner's role like that? From Time it also sounds like a power that is not discovered by the victim until they're dead. Xam claimed to be noticed because someone gave him a drink and didn't subtly poison his.Xam... I think you missed the point on the suspicious person is in those posts.
Swing and a miss...Strike 2It's Time to stop
Vote: Timeaisis
(I thought you meant they were both suspect)
Why would Time reveal his role or his partner's role like that? From Time it also sounds like a power that is not discovered by the victim until they're dead. Xam claimed to be noticed because someone gave him a drink and didn't subtly poison his.
I made a lot of noise off of something similar IV VI, but a power like a poisoner in a game with this fluff doesn't seem like a hard thing to imagine.
Not going to lie to you Launch, your continued defense and deflection for Fireblend is pretty suspicious. I realize it could be a simple "I really think he is town", but first you tie a vote and then push others to move the vote away from Fireblend, and this on top just seems weird. I already dont really buy the switcher thing; I cant imagine that scum target a seat with their NK, or many other roles for that matter, so an invisible switch before the main switch just seems redundant, but also provides an invisible power to role claim.
As for Terrabyte, I am not entirely sure I believe the claim. Firstly there was no reason to come out with it. In a random group of 20 odd people being placed in a limited number of seats, someone not moving isnt exactly a statistical oddity. I also have reason to doubt his report, but I cant verify it without outing another player.
Oh, thanks. Guess we should stop asking questions about them then. Glad we have you launch.
Holy crap was my post really that difficult to understand?
I am casting doubts upon Xam's assertion that he was given a drink, when two separate posters had previously speculated on Day 1 on such a role existing in the game. While it it possibly a coincidence, it reads more to me like someone (read: Xam) using previous discussion as a smoke screen and "look, I must be town because someone targetted me" as we have seen in previous games. (See: Batman where Scum used their vote steal power on Scum)
DudeHoly crap was my post really that difficult to understand?
I am casting doubts upon Xam's assertion that he was given a drink, when two separate posters had previously speculated on Day 1 on such a role existing in the game. While it it possibly a coincidence, it reads more to me like someone (read: Xam) using previous discussion as a smoke screen and "look, I must be town because someone targetted me" as we have seen in previous games. (See: Batman where Scum used their vote steal power on Scum)
lol Nin you're so full of shit. You ask people to post, but you have nothing to say yourself. I make a post, you give me sarcasm for sharing my opinion .
Holy crap was my post really that difficult to understand?
I am casting doubts upon Xam's assertion that he was given a drink, when two separate posters had previously speculated on Day 1 on such a role existing in the game. While it it possibly a coincidence, it reads more to me like someone (read: Xam) using previous discussion as a smoke screen and "look, I must be town because someone targetted me" as we have seen in previous games. (See: Batman where Scum used their vote steal power on Scum)
Somebody claiming they got poisoned seems like a problem that'll resolve itself TBH.
That statement is wronglol you didn't have to spell it out. I was trying to bait Xam info talking more about it.
Unless it's a 20 day phase poison.
Given the post above, I am going to say Xam is a scummy fuck who has no idea what he's doing.
At least that makes us two then. Thank God your opinion is not right.
I think nin knows more than he's letting onWhat am I full of shit about, exactly?
How would you know it's wrong?
Somebody claiming they got poisoned seems like a problem that'll resolve itself TBH.
Holy crap was my post really that difficult to understand?
I am casting doubts upon Xam's assertion that he was given a drink, when two separate posters had previously speculated on Day 1 on such a role existing in the game. While it it possibly a coincidence, it reads more to me like someone (read: Xam) using previous discussion as a smoke screen and "look, I must be town because someone targetted me" as we have seen in previous games. (See: Batman where Scum used their vote steal power on Scum)
I think it's a Day Kill, as a callback to the Day Kill in Gafia 1.We do not honestly even know what the "drink" does. It could kill him, sure, that would be the most likely answer and I suspect the one we are supposed to believe. It wouldnt be impossible to come up with alternatives, but as right now I actually doubt it happened, I thought it worth mentioning.
What am I full of shit about, exactly?
How would you know it's wrong?
If you say I am full of shit I throw that right back at you. And I disagree with you that's why I say you are wrong.
I would love to hear more from you. Not even joking right now. And no, trust me if I knew something I post it.That's quite the backtrack.
You want more of my opinion? You know something you shouldn't know and you're having trouble keeping it in your pants.
Only if people remember he posted it at all. I completely forgot until I did a read through again.Ahhh
But if he is scum, wouldn't it make sense to claim something like that because scum has a role like that? If he is the only one poisoned and no poisoner flips we're going to be very suspicious of Xam if he stays alive.
I admit to not having read Gafia 1, so if it is a reference, it went right over my head.I think it's a Day Kill, as a callback to the Day Kill in Gafia 1.
It might not be, though, as we're fairly far into the Day and I'm still fine.
I would love to hear more from you. Not even joking right now. And no, trust me if I knew something I post it.
LOL. Yes that's true I will have to agree on that part. The only way of me knowing something would be if I was with scum. I will reveal something for you then.Not if the only way you could have gotten that information was from your scum partners.
Sure but do it on day 8Can we lynch you just to be sure?
? Why Salva, out of curiousity?I am all for a Nin or Salva Lynch.
I am all for a Nin or Salva Lynch.
I can understand launch wanting to lynch me but you? Hmm. I will have to back down and rethink my strategy then.
Oh no, we're suspicious. Better go talk it out with your teammates.
Weird that he didn't reply.
Mornin'.
What the hell is nin doing?
OK back to logic now. Launch since you are here I would like to hear your thoughts on this issue issue or observation I have.
Since you claimed to have only scrambled table 2. We could trace back am action that would have occurred on that special table. If we believe the common thought that : night actions - > retro scramble. Right?
You could trace back the actions if you had a lot of information, I suppose?
This post just triggered my PTSD. THANKS TIMIt could also be a cowlick
I can understand launch wanting to lynch me but you? Hmm. I will have to back down and rethink my strategy then.
Both are for the same reason: throwing shade without any proof of conviction of their suspicion, and replying to suspicion held towards them by sarcasm and willingly ingore the opportunity to enhance discussion.? Why Salva, out of curiousity?
I am leaning towards Xam or Fireblend myself.