I mean, is your winning strategy not "the only people who voted scum are scum"?
By gum you're right! It sounds completely ridiculous when you put it that way!
Thank you for demonstrating the importance of
context in Mafia.
Again, you are resorting to pretending my argument was ridiculous despite the fact that noone else has struggled with it.
Plus my more important argument doesn't reference the votes at all, it's the one I quoted in my last post that talks about responses.
Has the town actually hunted a scum yet? We don't know 100% that a scum has even been a vote contender yet. So yeah, this town is garbage and we all should feel bad.
Yeah that's the spirit /s
I don't want to give up but if you want to close the game mislynching me is rather get it done sooner rather than later. But really, we should just knock TWE out, put both of our allegedly remaining protection roles on burbeting and sort through whatever fallout tomorrow brings, which is likely a dead burb because i don't think we do have two protection roles left and i believe it's possible there is a role blocker.
Well, we are lynching TWE today. I don't think there's much chance of it being anyone else, despite, which is why it's so funny that you and Fran continue to push it so much. Everyone else is (or was) discussing other stuff because we don't need to spend an entire day on an obvious lynch.
The bit of PR direction in there reinforces my suspicion that I (or maybe Gorlak) will be killed tonight.
But you didn't self protect... you didn't even protect the person you cleared. None of this makes any sense at all.
And here's your post to faddy after.
This is where the post goes from bad to outright scummy.
I claimed on D4. It's already been revealed that I've been hiding my doc shot since N3, so obviously the claims for the following nights are bullshit.
And you
know that my Faddy claim was on D4 because you went and found a quote from it. But the way you presented this accusation with my night actions implies I claimed D3 (since I checked Faddy N2) and then protected Bronx that night. Leaving out the fact that I claimed D4 is intentionally misleading.
Cop reveal to protect someone who is not in immediate danger and doesn't feel pressured.
But you claimed you might not make deadline so i accepted it.
Holy intentionally misleading batman!
Anyone remember this post from D4?
Don't use my poor play to excuse your own.
My point is that you only start to make a push once it becomes clear that a townie has a large vote lead. Your defence of Crab can be seen in a couple of ways. That you town read him and didn't want him lynched OR you knew he was town and wanted to earn yourself Townie Points by being his biggest defender when it looked highly likely he was going to be lynched.
Town/Town trains.
Day 1 - Crab vs Swamped were the two trains you tried to engineer
Day 2 - Crab made it clear he wanted to go after me or Vere. If either gained traction it would be a town/town train making your plea for the vote to close up a safe play for scum.
Bolding is mine.
Again, you went back to find that D4 quote, so you MUST have seen this post, and all the reactions in the thread that followed it, and yet you still present Faddy as "not in immediate danger" with a quote that only proves he can't read the room. This is hilariously blatant.
And again, a cop reveal for a single green check is only unusual for someone
who is actually a cop. It's a much more obvious play for a JOAT, especially one with a protective shot remaining.
What a terrible, baseless, argument against someone you apparently "town read". Could you make your scumminess any more obvious?