Bloodborne is objectively the best game of the year. You might like another game more and that's fine, but no game achieved its ambitions with such a level of simultaneous reckless ambition and graceful poise.
^out of the games I played anyways, which includes all frequent noms aside from starcraft and undertale
That is not at all how reviewing or scoring games works.
Like, from where I stand, Bloodborne is kind of a shitty game. I'm not saying that to be contrarian or anything--I make my living explaining game mechanics, and I genuinely feel I could back up the claims I have to make. I think there's a lot of shit it's actually pretty bad at, from gameplay to graphics (You'd think FROM would have figured out how to make good skyboxes with proper atmospheric distortion by now), and it wouldn't be anywhere near my game of the year list!
But I'm, y'know, me! I have weird opinions. I think that the best game of the year was The Witcher 3, and I think I could make a ton of arguments for why that is.
There's no such thing as "objective best game of the year," and the insipid fanboyism of the Bloodborne crowd only makes me like the game a great deal less.