Gandalf is an asshole.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Needs more bromance. And I mean literal bromance.

219ciah.jpg
 
How odd, I'm currently making my way through the Extended Editions. It's been a while since I've seen the movies and I can't imagine what they cut out without making them disjointed.
 
Teh Hamburglar said:
Yes, it is. They never provide reason why they couldn't. All the audience has to go on is what the movie shows/tells them. a wooden bow can reach more than a couple hundred yards at best.

So army/Sauron's eye is a logical explanation. Except that army is useless against aerial assault. And the 9 Nazgul could be overpowered with numbers.

Not saying I disagree with your post but within the context of the movie its like they pulled it out of their ass.

Not really. In the movie you see less than a dozen Eagles. You also see shit like cave trolls, an Elf shoot down an elephant, ballistae, etc, so they probably would have been able to do something in the air, especially with nazgul. What were they going to do, fly over top and drop it? Not only would Sauron have seen them coming with scouts DAYS before they got there, he probably would have had something in place to stop it pretty quickly. It's not even a stretch.
 
AbortedWalrusFetus said:
Not really. In the movie you see less than a dozen Eagles. You also see shit like cave trolls, an Elf shoot down an elephant, ballistae, etc, so they probably would have been able to do something in the air, especially with nazgul. What were they going to do, fly over top and drop it? Not only would Sauron have seen them coming with scouts DAYS before they got there, he probably would have had something in place to stop it pretty quickly. It's not even a stretch.


where in the movie did they explain all this? They didn't. Its a plot hole.
 
Obviously Sauron would have been alerted by his spies that his lost ring was about to be delivered right on his doorstep. Then the path would be open for a simple four-step plan to world domination.

1. Dispatch Nazgul on winged mounts.
2. Nazgul fuck up eagles and Frodo.
3. Nazgul retrieve the One Ring.
4. Orgy of destruction.
 
I also though the eagles sorta didn't give a fuck. They're Maia right? I thought the West was over Middle Earth. They already had Melkor, Sauron was like "whatever".
 
Monocle said:
Obviously Sauron would have been alerted by his spies that his lost ring was about to be delivered right on his doorstep. Then the path would be open for a simple four-step plan to world domination.

1. Dispatch Nazgul on winged mounts.
2. Nazgul fuck up eagles and Frodo.
3. Nazgul retrieve the One Ring.
4. Orgy of destruction.
Now that's my kind of movie.
 
fireside said:
Surprised Aragorn not using his magic ghost army to destroy Mordor hasn't been mentioned yet.

Eh, Aragorn promised to set them free after they turned the tide at Minas Tirith. If he kept them captive he would have portrayed himself as no more honorable than a regular man. It would have hinted that he was corruptible and it would have made him denying the one ring less believable.
 
The main problem I've always had with stories like this is that the entire area of land all these different races live on and such never seems to be bigger than the state of Texas. Kinda like how the land of Hyrule in Zelda games is always about the size of two Wal-Mart Supercenter parking lots.
 
Snaku said:
20ap6ci.jpg


That's right, Gandalf Stormcrow is an asshole. He sent an innocent bright-eyed hobbit on a perilous journey that ultimately cost the poor bastard its life. For what? He could have sent Frodo & the Ring on an eagle(s) and ended the threat of Sauron in a matter of days. So what was the point of dragging it out?
interestingly, I watched the series a couple of weeks ago in HD and during the first movie I thought the same thing. Like everyone, i've seen all 3 movies multiple times. But this time it occured to me...if he had the ability to summon eagles to rescue them...why didn't he summon them to go to the mountain in the first place?

I just made some shit up to put my mind at ease. I figured that because Saron was still alive, his eye would have seen the eagles coming and sent his goons to handle them. Or that the general amount of evil juice Sauron oozes would have been too much for pure animals like eagles to get too close to his vicinity without becoming influenced or sickened in some way.

idk. maybe the book affords some real justification?
 
scitek said:
The main problem I've always had with stories like this is that the entire area of land all these different races live on and such never seems to be bigger than the state of Texas. Kinda like how the land of Hyrule in Zelda games is always about the size of two Wal-Mart Supercenter parking lots.
Tolkien made LotR to be groundwork for a "English mythology". So Middle-earth's size is clearly based upon England's + western Europe.

Zelda is clearly just a game limitation (hence why it increases in scope every generation).
 
The
obvious
reason to why Gandalf didn't have Frodo ride the Eagles is because Sauron's eye would have spotted them and if that happened they would be screwed. That's why they sent in such a small group of people so that they'd be unnoticed by Sauron.

giga said:
The books came out in the 50s.
...and?
 
There was an awesome gif posted a few years back that had them all debating in Rivendale and then Gandalf just says "fuckit" and takes the ring on the back of the eagles. A lock of she-elf hair to the person who can relocate that gif.

That said, this thread is about 7 years too late.
 
GhaleonEB said:
Eye of Sauron + Nazgul = tasty, tasty eagle meat. And one captured Ring.
that was my assumption. initially I was too shared the TC's concern...then I dismissed it after a few minutes of critical thought.
 
As people have pointed out, the Eagles would be toast. But that isn't the main problem with them. In the movies, we've never seen them before, they literally appear out of nowhere to save the day in a Deus Ex Machina fashion.
 
Jexhius said:
As people have pointed out, the Eagles would be toast. But that isn't the main problem with them. In the movies, we've never seen them before, they literally appear out of nowhere to save the day in a Deus Ex Machina fashion.
No, I'm pretty sure we see them when Gandalf is in Orthanc.

Edit: Double post... oops.
 
WyndhamPrice said:
A good look at the "Eagle" problem

As the article says, in the end it was more a matter of "there wouldn't be a story" if they just flew the ring to Mount Doom, but there are several plausible explanations within the context of Middle-Earth, the chief one being keeping the ring an absolute secret.

Should it have been brought up in the films? Probably.
lol @ them trying to scientifically explain why they didn't just use eagles and finish up the quest in an hour or so.

Sure it would have been "risky", but not nearly as risky as all the other crap they had to deal with on their long ass trek.
 
I like how a story with fucking immortal elves, scary magic eyes, enchanted forests and wizards has a plot hole because you don't agree with their threat assessment regarding flying on the back of an eagle towards a magic volcano.
 
Dude, Gandalf could've just as well bailed and returned to Valinor and shit. He was almost a demigod and wanted to have fun.

But why just summon eagles and solve the problem when you can look at petty mortals trying to do something with it?

Yeah, he was an asshole. But he just wanted to have some fun before he leaves middle-earth!
 
Jexhius said:
As people have pointed out, the Eagles would be toast. But that isn't the main problem with them. In the movies, we've never seen them before, they literally appear out of nowhere to save the day in a Deus Ex Machina fashion.
In the movies, yeah. They were in the Hobbit though, and actually took part in the final battle there.
CassSept said:
Dude, Gandalf could've just as well bailed and returned to Valinor and shit. He was almost a demigod and wanted to have fun.
But why just summon eagles and solve the problem when you can look at petty mortals trying to do something with it?
Hey, this sounds a lot like Death Note.
 
Nimyh said:
In the movies, yeah. They were in the Hobbit though, and actually took part in the final battle there.

Hey, this sounds a lot like Death Note.
Not even in the movies. Gandalf called upon one of them to break him out of Sarumans tower back in Fellowship.
 
I like how a story with fucking immortal elves, scary magic eyes, enchanted forests and wizards has a plot hole because you don't agree with their threat assessment regarding flying on the back of an eagle towards a magic volcano.

immortal elves, scary magic eyes, enchanted forests and wizards are not plot holes. These discussions are always about consistency, not realism, as some people seem to think. For the record i don't think the eagles 'plot hole' is really worth discussing. Sure it wasn't the most elegant of literary devices, but there are ways to explain it without conflicting with previous information.
 
Gandalf is painted as somewhat of a jerk in the books and movie, but he gets things done.

I was always under the impression that 2 things were happening.

-Most things were not aware of the danger Middle Earth was in, so many inhabitants didn't involve themselves in including a lot of humans (or the hobbits for that matter). The eagles simply weren't interested in the battle. Reminds me of the Ents who had to see their forest destroyed before they did something.

- The eagles owed Gandalf a favor and did things at his request not at man's. Because of their wisdom and foresight, they were able to discern the danger presented to them (I thought this is why they aided in the Hobbit too) and acted accordingly.

As an audience member I didn't see their spotty help as a plothole. I had more problems with the undead army being released before the final battle (In the movie. I haven't gotten that far in the books yet).
 
I thought either Manwe or Radaghast sent the eagles. One had a policy to not meddle in middle earth's affair and the other was indifferent to everything non-nature related.
 
The undead army played better in the extended edition I thought.

You could argue its more telegraphed in the extended edition, but its not like it was really a surprise that they'd agreed to help anyways. More context and setup improved that plot point imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom