• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Giant Bomb #8 | It's a Hit!

Status
Not open for further replies.
EU PSN USERS ONLY

If you guys haven't heard already you can grab Guacamelee on PS4 as an upgrade to the free plus version for less than £3.

I knew the sniper elite quick look would be awesome.
 
I met someone who didn't know Paris was occupied during WW2. He lives in Paris...

Not knowing stuff was happening in Africa is a bit more understandable I think. You barely hear about it in school and popular culture only ever talks about Normandy or the russian front. You kinda have to seek out that information.

He said on twitter that he has seen Patton and loves it.

how........
 
the future? you are talking about two 30-35 year old dudes. lol

Not just them, but the others that are saying no one knows about it.

It makes my head hurt to think that there are probably many who think that Normandy were the first boots on the ground in the conflict, that the Italian campaign never happened, that the Eastern Front was no big deal... people who forget history are doomed to repeat it, etc etc.

The US was close to getting its ass kicked right out of Tunisia, and had that happened the entire western world could very well be speaking German right now.
 
I strongly disagree that one has to "seek out" information about the mere existence of a major front in WWII.
I definitely had to seek it out. It probably depends on where you're from but the way I was taught about WW2 in school was extremely lacking. Almost everything I know that isn't "Hitler wanted to kill jews", I had to learn on my own. It is super sad but I'm really not surprised to hear that some people don't know about the african front.
 
When did we start calling world war II "world war II"?


Like... at what point did we as a people decide this was WWI and this other war was its follow up.
 
i feel like we all need to have perspective on this and remember that dan wrote a book about pro wrestling, as well as two books (one with a foreword by Jose Canseco) about an alligator that flies planes


When did we start calling wolrd war II "world war II"?


Like... at what point did we as a people decide this was WWI and this other war was its follow up.

Actually fairly early, IIRC. I know people called WWI the World War not long after it ended (or even during it?), and within the first year of German invasions, people were calling it "the second World War."
 
it's called World War II for a reason

WorldWar3-1995logo.jpg
 
At least in my schools in the American South, we were pretty much exclusively taught about the European Theater, with a little bit of info here and there about the Pacific. I honestly don't think we've talked about Africa in WWII even once, and I'm about to graduate college.

The first time I'd heard of any fighting going on in Africa was from the demo of Call of Duty 2.
 
Jeff said no on his blog

Boo. I had this weird dream that him and Dave Lang shared a hotel room and made a giant pancake in a rice cooker together. They would then just make side bets on non-main even tournaments and then end up getting food poisoning at a buffet and watch the tournament on a tiny laptop in their hotel room.
 
I met someone who didn't know Paris was occupied during WW2. He lives in Paris...

Not knowing stuff was happening in Africa is a bit more understandable I think. You barely hear about it in school and popular culture only ever talks about Normandy or the russian front. You kinda have to seek out that information.
I'm not sure I even know anyone who knows about the China/Burma/India theater, let alone Africa.
 
I knew that Africa was a theater in the war, but cmon now, we're all brought up to the landing on Normandy and retribution for Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. The African theater is barely mentioned or given even an ounce of attention compared to the rest.

But yeah, I'm sure they were just joking around and feigning ignorance for effect but i haven't seen the QL so who knows.
 
Was Jeff's Mixlr this morning any calmer than yesterday? Even that got heated in the chat though don't remember him addressing anything at the time.
 
Actually fairly early, IIRC. I know people called WWI the World War not long after it ended (or even during it?), and within the first year of German invasions, people were calling it "the second World War."
I think someone came up with the term "world war" before the first one even started. I'm almost 100% sure I read that somewhere.
 
Guys, I feel like you are missing a key point here.

Dan has seen and enjoyed Patton.

He had no idea about the WWII African front.

THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE.
 
Everyone should know important history like WWII. Crazy that Jeff and Dan were so clueless.


It isn't like they'd never heard of World War 2. I disagree with the assertion that specifics of locations of some battles of the war are important history.
 
Piskaryovskoye Memorial Cemetery in Saint Petersburg is the resting place of 470,000 civilians and soldiers who died in and around Leningrad. They are buried in 186 mass graves with nothing more than a tombstone with a year put on it.

Only 70 years later... oh well I guess.

My point is that when you think about it, it's not really surprising that Jeff and Jeff #2 aren't that knowledgeable about history.
 
It isn't like they'd never heard of World War 2. I disagree with the assertion that specifics of locations of some battles of the war are important history.

The fuck?

My point is that when you think about it, it's not really surprising that Jeff and Jeff #2 aren't that knowledgeable about history.

I hear you. It's just makes me very sad.

CosmicQueso, I get what you're trying to do but responding to Emcee's post like that comes off as unintentionally comical which I dont think such a resting place deserves.

I cannot see how that can be considered unintentionally comical in any way.
 
CosmicQueso, I get what you're trying to do but responding to Emcee's post like that comes off as unintentionally comical which I dont think such a resting place deserves.
 
Woah! Kinda expected some negative reactions to the new hires, but man... some people can be total dicks.
Both guys seem pretty cool and a good fit also. I'm really looking forward to their contributions to the site.
 
The fuck?


In what way is it important? How is it significant or impactful in any way to the average person so that they need to know where every battle of any given war took place?

It's war trivia, it's not vital information. The reasons for the war and why the war escalated in the way it did, the actual events leading to the end of the war (as opposed to just "The US came and won everything"), the number of people whose lives it impacted and ended, these are important things to know about World War 2. The locations it was fought in are not.
 
Count me in as wanting World War Drew. I'm not really into simulator games but more Drew content is good content.
 
Piskaryovskoye Memorial Cemetery in Saint Petersburg is the resting place of 470,000 civilians and soldiers who died in and around Leningrad. They are buried in 186 mass graves with nothing more than a tombstone with a year put on it.

central-alley-of-piskaryovskoye-memorial-cemetery-in-st-petersburg.jpg


Talk about all of us needing to have perspective.

I walked by every one of those mounds. They are massive. Also walked through Mauthausen, across the cliffs of Pointe du Hoc, and across the fields of the Battle of Verdun (different war, but still). That'll give you some perspective.

Only 70 years later... oh well I guess.

You can, you know, email them about that...
 
In what way is it important? How is it significant or impactful in any way to the average person so that they need to know where every battle of any given war took place?

It's war trivia, it's not vital information. The reasons for the war and why the war escalated in the way it did, the actual events leading to the end of the war (as opposed to just "The US came and won everything"), the number of people whose lives it impacted and ended, these are important things to know about World War 2. The locations it was fought in are not.

There's a difference between knowing about every single battles and knowing about one of the biggest theater of the war.
 
Guys, I feel like you are missing a key point here.

Dan has seen and enjoyed Patton.

He had no idea about the WWII African front.

THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE.

"No idea" is a bit strong. We all have brain farts now and then, usually followed up with "oh shit, of course". It's not like he engaged in a 10 minute conversation about the African front not existing.
 
Did you watch it? That was no brain fart.

In what way is it important? How is it significant or impactful in any way to the average person so that they need to know where every battle of any given war took place?

It's war trivia, it's not vital information. The reasons for the war and why the war escalated in the way it did, the actual events leading to the end of the war (as opposed to just "The US came and won everything"), the number of people whose lives it impacted and ended, these are important things to know about World War 2. The locations it was fought in are not.

Knowing that WWII spanned continents is valuable information.

The American Civil War happened! North won!

Where did it take place?

Who gives a shit! American probably?
 
I cannot see how that can be considered unintentionally comical in any way.

Its an extremely serious, heavy response to a really light post that doesnt really warrant the response. You really dont see how the whiplash and instant escalation of "Dan wrote Air Force Gator haha" to "PEOPLE DIED IVE WALK PAST THEIR GRAVES" can come off as comic?
 
I definitely had to seek it out. It probably depends on where you're from but the way I was taught about WW2 in school was extremely lacking. Almost everything I know that isn't "Hitler wanted to kill jews", I had to learn on my own. It is super sad but I'm really not surprised to hear that some people don't know about the african front.
Well, I guess if you're italian like me or british, then you have to know those facts.
 
Well, I guess if you're italian like me or british, then you have to know those facts.

wait WW2 wasn't about america and how america was affronted by the japanese and then we dropped the bombs and won the war?

that's what they taught us in school and movies.
 
In what way is it important? How is it significant or impactful in any way to the average person so that they need to know where every battle of any given war took place?

It's war trivia, it's not vital information. The reasons for the war and why the war escalated in the way it did, the actual events leading to the end of the war (as opposed to just "The US came and won everything"), the number of people whose lives it impacted and ended, these are important things to know about World War 2. The locations it was fought in are not.

To know the reasons for why something took place is to also consider its geographical location and the history of that location; it's also important for studying the impacts in those locations years later.
 
As a whippersnapper correspondent who is still in high school and just covered World War II this past school year, we definitely learned about the front in Africa, the occupation of Paris, and even less commonly covered topics like Japanese internment camps. We did a bunch of everything. I can't speak for every school and every teacher though -- I had a good teacher. But the notion of some saying things like, "future generations are doomed!" is silly. If anything, many of these topics are being taught more as they become less taboo.

That said, condemning people for not being knowledgeable on a topic does not encourage learning. It makes those people feel bad. Instead, how about making recommendations or going about enlightening those people on things you deem important in a reasonable way? The insults and melodrama are counterproductive and a bit much.
 
To know the reasons for why something took place is to also consider its geographical location and the history of that location; it's also important for studying the impacts in those locations years later.


That's all great if you're a war historian or interested in history as a hobby, or if you're an international politician. Or even if there's something significant that can be tied back to those events and you go to get more information about it out of curiosity. It's absolutely not information that must be known by every citizen of every country. And it's also not something I ever covered in any class in my experience up to and including college courses. It isn't part of basic education for most of the world and it isn't vital information for the daily lives of those people who didn't learn about it, so it's 100% understandable for somebody to not be aware of it. I knew that the war was fought in North Africa. But I don't care one bit if somebody else didn't know that.

edit: The pop culture/ Patton connection might even be understandable. I've never seen Patton so I can't comment on how clear the setting was made in the movie, but I didn't really remember that where Casablanca took place. Eventually I probably would have gotten there, but when I first read it brought up in this discussion my first reaction was "Oh, right, that was set in Africa"


edit 2: Obviously I'm not saying anybody should celebrate that they don't know detailed history, just that they shouldn't be derided for it. There's way too much shit for everybody to know everything.
 
As a whippersnapper correspondent who is still in high school and just covered World War II this past school year, we definitely learned about the front in Africa, the occupation of Paris, and even less commonly covered topics like Japanese internment camps. We did a bunch of everything. I can't speak for every school and every teacher though -- I had a good teacher. But the notion of some saying things like, "future generations are doomed!" is silly. If anything, many of these topics are being taught more as they become less taboo.

That said, condemning people for not being knowledgeable on a topic does not encourage learning. It makes those people feel bad. Instead, how about making recommendations or going about enlightening those people on things you deem important in a reasonable way? The insults and melodrama are counterproductive and a bit much.

.
 
As a whippersnapper correspondent who is still in high school and just covered World War II this past school year, we definitely learned about the front in Africa, the occupation of Paris, and even less commonly covered topics like Japanese internment camps. We did a bunch of everything. I can't speak for every school and every teacher though -- I had a good teacher. But the notion of some saying things like, "future generations are doomed!" is silly. If anything, many of these topics are being taught more as they become less taboo.

That said, condemning people for not being knowledgeable on a topic does not encourage learning. It makes those people feel bad. Instead, how about making recommendations or going about enlightening those people on things you deem important in a reasonable way? The insults and melodrama are counterproductive and a bit much.

Most I've ever agreed with a high schooler.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom