Giant Bomb #8 | It's a Hit!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean, can you define this other side? I keep seeing this idea of the other side pop up, as it did in the comments of the podcast or the thread about the hires, but it's rarely defined except as people espousing criticism. Are there specific people here you are speaking of? I just don't know who you're addressing.
.

Pretty much. Just seems like a BS false equivalence to me. This whole episode of the GB community completely flipping their shit over a 10 minute segment vaguely related to inclusion reflects poorly on the GB community and no one else, plain and simple. Trying to paint it as another skirmish in the eternal struggle between S Jay Dubyas and the GB community while doing the the whole infuriating southpark thing of "`~*maaaaayyyyyybbbe both sides are wrong*~" is stupid.
 
My original point was that even though the GB community looks bad here, there are many good members of it. In a similar vein, the critics of GB have a point worth listening to, but there are some making that side look bad due to the aggressive nature of their critique.

Neither side of this is going to come away looking good if things continue the way they are going right now.

I really disagree with your stance that both "sides" are at fault in these situations. It feels like justification for stuff that shouldn't be tolerated. People on Twitter were criticizing a public entity. They may have done with a harsh tone at points, but there's nothing wrong with that. Anyone should be allowed to say "yo, that's shit because reasons!" at any time. That is the beauty of the Internet. In a similar manner anyone of justified in answering those criticisms with arguments and comments.

What should not be tolerated in reasonable places is the answering of such complaints with slurs and threats or reacting with extreme hostility and grossness to the mere presence of a woman on a podcast. No, it isn't the whole Giant Bomb community doing this, but anyone that is doing this shit doesn't belong on the site.
 
Then, again, I still don't see the relevancy of going "It's not all of them/us, it's just a small group of people!"

I think that's more a defensive statement to people saying that the GB community as a whole is "toxic" and such, and not people trying to downplay the problems that exist. You might argue that by saying that you are downplaying the problems, but I'd disagree with that as long as you say that there are problems that we need to work to fix.

Anyways, I'm off to work for 24 hours without the internet. Don't know how I'll survive.
 
*catches up on last few pages*

holy shit people are terrible

*catches up on this post*

holy shit this post is terrible

smh

I think that's more a defensive statement to people saying that the GB community as a whole is "toxic" and such, and not people trying to downplay the problems that exist. You might argue that by saying that you are downplaying the problems, but I'd disagree with that as long as you say that there are problems that we need to work to fix.

I think, and maybe this is a poor assumption, but I've seen you very active the few times I've been on GB's comment section and forums, that you have a different take on the GB community because you're a part of it in a way few are in this thread.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.
 
Goddamnit. Just goddamnit...We, as the Giant Bomb community, did not in any way, shape or form decide to be toxic or awful again. I'm really done with this shit. There are a lot of good people in the GB-community that actually are ashamed to have taken part in light of what happened and have left for good, because of comments exactly like these.

I just love how our community gets thrown under the bus because each time, for an unfortunate twitter happening that most of the community did not partake in. New moderation policy's are underway, mods are quick to react and most comments were just valid criticisms.
The fact that enough posters were comfortable enough to post vile shit is an indictment on the community. There's a certain modicum of self-moderation that should exist in a polite community, and it just wasn't there.
 
I think, and maybe this is a poor assumption, but I've seen you very active the few times I've been on GB's comment section and forums, that you have a different take on the GB community because you're a part of it in a way few are in this thread.

Are you saying there's some Stockholm Syndrome going on here with me and the GB community? ;)

The fact that enough posters were comfortable enough to post vile shit is an indictment on the community. There's a certain modicum of self-moderation that should exist in a polite community, and it just wasn't there.

If you go by that standard, pretty much every community is awful. Threads about social issues on GAF often get really ugly, to give you one example. But fair enough if you apply the same measure for every community.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

I can almost guarantee that they won't have hired a woman by then. Frankly, I don't see them hiring ANYBODY else by then.

They lost Ryan and it still took just shy of a year to hire new people. I suspect next round of hires to be Q2 2015.
 
Were people upset that there was a woman on the podcast, that she was trans, or both? I stopped listening about half an hour in since i tend to get bored quickly of bombcasts without Jeff.

About halfway through the bombcast now and the only things bothering me is Brad being totally unable to keep the show rolling forward without long instances of musing/sidetracking. I don't mind going off topic for a bit but the podcast really needs someone who can give it some direction (and humor) when Jeff isn't there. Just makes me miss Patrick and Vinny on the bombcast even more.
 
I can almost guarantee that they won't have hired a woman by then. Frankly, I don't see them hiring ANYBODY else by then.

They lost Ryan and it still took just shy of a year to hire new people. I suspect next round of hires to be Q2 2015.

I suspect you're right, and that's why their hiring Dan R. was such a super huge bummer, at least for me. And they wonder why they're getting posts like the shit they got overnight ...
 
Every time this happens, I always see the excuse of "It's not everyone!"

Which, sure? I would bet not everyone is like that. It is an uncomfortably large number of people, though, and the ratio to the totality of Giant Bomb users and viewers is pretty irrelevant.

You'd figure the excuse would stop coming up when things like this happen repeatedly, but they only get more vehement. The problem is, it's not really an excuse or defense of anything, it's just people wanting everyone to know how they're not the bad ones.

Hm. Let me put it a way this thread might now understand. In One Piece, when Arlong extended Nami's debt and she couldn't save her village and she fell to her knees and cried, Luffy didn't go up to her and go "Look, stop crying, not all pirates are like that."

Spend 5 minutes looking anywhere on the internet where social/gender/sexuality issues are mentioned (even on this very own forum - just read some of the shit in the recent 'would you date a transgender person?' thread) and you'll see a mountain of bile. Go ask Carolyn what her years at Gamespot have been like, or Patricia at Kotaku.

Everywhere people are having to heavily moderate, or just turn off, comments. Everywhere people are reporting tons of abuse on twitter and other social media. The situation is shit. As Rorie himself has mentioned several times, a lot of it is forming outside of GB then worming its way over there in waves of new accounts.

So yeah, no shit their community is going to get defensive over something that is completely out of their control. You're equating the problem to attitudes seen in larger movements like '#YesAllWomen', but they're not inherently similar. One is raising awareness to the problems women face that men don't even see, while the other is expressing concern that a massive community which has done a lot of good is unable to stop themselves being painted with a board brush.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

Seriously?

Their editorial staff is pretty small. What percentage of the gaming press as a whole are white dudes? I bet percentage wise GB are bang on trend.

If you actually, truly don't care about peoples skin colour, sexual orientation, gender etc, then I would, I imagine, in the gaming press, end up with white dudes.

Sure, there always the argument for positive discrimination, but if you honestly don't give a shit, why should these guys be frowned on?
 
If you go by that standard, pretty much every community is awful. Threads about social issues on GAF often get really ugly, to give you one example. But fair enough if you apply the same measure for every community.
There are a lot of ignorant, uneducated fucks on this forum. Which isn't surprising considering the level of activity here.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

You should probably tweet this or post it on one of the team's Tumblrs if you want any action, I know some of the GB peeps read this thread but it's not guaranteed to be acknowledged in the same way.

...I wasn't talking about people in this thread :|

My mistake then, I apologize for my poor reading comprehension.
 
This drama is all pretty stupid but I have to say I found the last Bombcast pretty boring. Samantha was fine but as usual when they have quests on, I kinda lose interest. Jeff Green, Brad from Double Fine, Johny V and Jared are the only ones that have been hilarious on the show. Also, when both Jeff and Vinny are missing it kinda gets boring.

Watcing The Fall QL right now, the aesthetic reminds me (like Vinny mentioned) of the Swapper so much. Game seems great!


My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

Don't fix it if it ain't broke.
 
GB community proves itself to be awful again.
My favourite thing about this was the multiple angry #notallgiantbomb replies.
we just feel it would be best to not give the negative elements a place to be negative
I hope that's a core element of your new rules going forward.
Pretty much. Just seems like a BS false equivalence to me. This whole episode of the GB community completely flipping their shit over a 10 minute segment vaguely related to inclusion reflects poorly on the GB community and no one else, plain and simple. Trying to paint it as another skirmish in the eternal struggle between S Jay Dubyas and the GB community while doing the the whole infuriating southpark thing of "`~*maaaaayyyyyybbbe both sides are wrong*~" is stupid.
Couldn't agree more, it looks like people are trying to shifting as much blame away from the community as possible. Gross.
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.
I won't be renewing my subscription when it expires for the same reason.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

People being hired should with the aim of who is best for the job, or who has most potential in the job. It should not be ascribed to filing other groups, although it would be great if we got other races/colours/etc on the show. Moreover, Giantbomb staff is relatively very small to other websites, and when working with the *apparent* proportions and statistics of women in the games journalism bushiness, you can see why there has not been one hired too.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

You don't have to wait especially looking that it probably won't happen.

A number of community members on the other side of the coin already did after being banned because they wanted things to stay the same.
 
My Giant Bomb subscription expires January 20, 2015. If GB hasn't hired a woman on full-time by then, I won't renew and I'll drop their podcast like a bad habit.

It's halfway through 2014, and they're one of the few gaming sites with 100% white dudes. Shameful.

Is it really progressing the feminist cause by hiring a woman just for the sake of hiring a woman? You're just promoting the idea of tokenism instead of true equality.
 
I suspect you're right, and that's why their hiring Dan R. was such a super huge bummer, at least for me. And they wonder why they're getting posts like the shit they got overnight ...

I won't be renewing my subscription when it expires for the same reason.

Part of me wants to point out that not renewing subscriptions actually harms their effort to expand hiring, but then I also realize that it's the most effective way to convey your displeasure with how they run things. It's like a damned if you do/damned if you don't situation.

I also feel bad for Jeff, who I believe hired the person he honestly felt was the best fit for the position. Unfortunately, it wasn't a woman this time, but I'm sure he'd love to hire a woman when he can. But that opens up the "if not now, when" conversation, and ugh we're down the rabbit hole.

In fact, I'm partially curious if this vacation was always planned, or if the recent nastiness took its toll on him.

For now, I'm going to appreciate GB for what it is. When they do announce the next hiring window, I'll definitely be rooting for a woman, but I also understand that there is literally nothing they can do right now except for bringing on more female guests, which I think they realize they need to do and appear to actually be doing.
 
I trust that they hire the best people for the job. I have 0 issues with whom they hired and if they hire a female/minority/a suspicious space alien that might be a space nazi then i have 100% confidence that they picked the right person for the job. If people do not approve of their hirings because of race/gender/any other thing I think that's pretty unfair to the new hires because those are not things the new hires can fix or be faulted for.

If you tell me you don't like dan because he'd rather have milk than poopy pool water then fine, seems like you at least gave the guy a shot.
 
Relax, people. Cara will be next.

Also, GB would hire everyone and their dog if they could. It will never be up to them, so continuing to subscribe now after Dan's been hired but making up a deadline for them _in the future_ seems really disingenuous. They're back to being powerless when it comes to hiring people, it's the sad reality. I'm not in a position to tell anyone what to do with their money, though, obviously.

What happened to 1001 spikes? We need scoops content.

Scoops looking for that spark again.
 
The strangest thing to me is Samantha absolutely conducts herself in the way people who usually have issues with "social justice" would seemingly want. Many times in threads about feminism or social issues the common complaint is about the "tone", "agenda", and "unfair slights", causing them to be defensive to the actual issues. Feel attacked, get defensive and dumb. I can comprehend that as silly as it is.

In this case, Samantha was positive, polite, and basically completely inoffensive. Whatever was being said that got the comments locked or on Twitter were only based on her being a girl and not some perceived slight or agenda. Everyone was happy with her there and she seemed really pleased about it all. So I can't even place how these people justify being upset about any of it besides just being kind of shitty.
 
Relax, people. Cara will be next.

Also, GB would hire everyone and their dog if they could. It will never be up to them, so continuing to subscribe now after Dan's been hired but making up a deadline for them _in the future_ seems really disingenuous. They're back to being powerless when it comes to hiring people, it's the sad reality. I'm not in a position to tell anyone what to do with their money, though, obviously.

No one cares about jimmy :(
 
I probably won't be renewing because there hasn't been much in the way of good subscriber content for a while, maybe a good video every two weeks since April or May. UPFs are extremely boring with one or two interesting segments and then a lot of filler and I don't listen to the subscriber podcasts.

I'll still use GB the site but I don't see a compulsion to give them $30 - $50 a year for access to a section I am not really enjoying.
 
The strangest thing to me is Samantha absolutely conducts herself in the way people who usually have issues with "social justice" would seemingly want. Many times in threads about feminism or social issues the common complaint is about the "tone", "agenda", and "unfair slights", causing them to be defensive to the actual issues. Feel attacked, get defensive and dumb. I can comprehend that as silly as it is.

In this case, Samantha was positive, polite, and basically completely inoffensive. Whatever was being said that got the comments locked or on Twitter were only based on her being a girl and not some perceived slight or agenda. Everyone was happy with her there and she seemed really pleased about it all. So I can't even place how these people justify being upset about any of it besides just being kind of shitty.
It's this. Well, except they were being really shitty.
 
People being hired should be down to who is best for the job, or who has most potential in the job. It should not be ascribed to filing other groups, although it would be great if we got other races/colours/etc on the show. Moreover, Giantbomb staff is relatively very small to other websites, and when working with the *apparent* proportions and statistics of women in the games journalism bushiness, you can see why there has not been one hired too.
We've been through this argument and it's not very good really. It's a video game website, what does 'best for the job' even mean?
At the moment I'm not bothered about the white dudes thing as much as I am regarding how much Dan apparently doesn't know about that wasn't already covered. He fits in well and I enjoy his content but I can't imagine a safer pick.
 
Watcing The Fall QL right now, the aesthetic reminds me (like Vinny mentioned) of the Swapper so much. Game seems great!

Tried it for an hour or so last night. The game seems legitimately really interesting. Going to play it through when I can and see how it turns out.
 
Let's not conflate disappointment at the lack of staff diversity with disappointment in Dan himself.

Although "Dan doesn't know obvious fact" became a meme over the span of one quicklook.
 
My favourite thing about this was the multiple angry #notallgiantbomb replies.
Yes, how dare a community defend themselves from the notion that it's a bottomless cesspit now. You are free to cancel your sub for whatever reason but it's unfair to anyone involved to say the hirings were not inclusive enough, two positions being added to a skeleton crew of five.
 
I think Dan works because he's exactly like Jeff with a few different opinions.

But I don't find him very interesting because he's exactly like Jeff with a few different opinions.
 
We've been through this argument and it's not very good really. It's a video game website, what does 'best for the job' even mean?
At the moment I'm not bothered about the white dudes thing as much as I am regarding how much Dan apparently doesn't know about that wasn't already covered. He fits in well and I enjoy his content but I can't imagine a safer pick.

'Best for the job' could mean fitting best with the group of people, having unusually good or different opinions on certain areas, or other criteria that we are oblivious to since we are the consumer. I am sure that Dan was picked for the best reasons on Jeff's part above the rest. Although I do understand there is a blurred line with Giantbomb with 'fitting with the group' and being good at editorial/other criteria. I agree there could have been a more unusual 'pick' but perhaps Jeff felt they needed someone a bit closer to the group since Giantbomb was effectively splitting. But then, would that unusual pick have been a man or a woman? Who knows.
 
Seriously?

Their editorial staff is pretty small. What percentage of the gaming press as a whole are white dudes? I bet percentage wise GB are bang on trend.

If you actually, truly don't care about peoples skin colour, sexual orientation, gender etc, then I would, I imagine, in the gaming press, end up with white dudes.

Sure, there always the argument for positive discrimination, but if you honestly don't give a shit, why should these guys be frowned on?

Maybe a few years ago, but most of them (Polygon, Kotaku, Joystiq) have at least one woman and several people of color on their staff at this point. GB just keeps rolling on with the status quo.
 
I'm not arguing nor defending a notion that the community is "full of bigots," but instead saying "the community has issues that need addressing." If we don't acknowledge that these are problems by instead acting like it's some fringe tiny minority that's not really a part of the community (as was said when the worst of the harassment was in full swing a few weeks ago), then we're not going to improve. Yes, not all members of the community are bad, and painting it broadly is a problem. No argument. But the problem with that as a response to criticism is that it doesn't actually address the underlying issue, it derails it.

Likewise, I would have no problem acknowledging that there are bigots in the community. In no way am I trying to say that we should be dismissive toward that criticism. My original comment was directed at the "GB community is awful" comments that keep popping up here.

Here's a couple articles that cover the issues with the Not All Men argument; the underlying principles apply to most Not All arguments. Hopefully this explains what I'm getting at better than I can:

From: Slate
Another article by Time

I'm not sure I entirely agree. Certainly, if you identify a specific case of "this person did this horrible thing, so he is a horrible person" and I use the "Well, not all of us are like that"... that is an useless statement. However, if you say "this person did this horrible thing, so all of you are horrible" then you have forced me into a defensive position where I must defend myself with the "Not all of us" argument.
 
I think Dan works because he's exactly like Jeff with a few different opinions.

But I don't find him very interesting because he's exactly like Jeff with a few different opinions.

So he's not exactly like Jeff then :P. He likes Nintendo games, that in and of itself, should be welcome to a staff who is largely disinterested in their products.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom