• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Girl who convinced friend to commit suicide found guilty of involuntary manslaughter

Volimar

Member
A Massachusetts judge found Michelle Carter, 20, guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the 2014 death of her boyfriend, who poisoned himself by inhaling carbon monoxide in his pickup truck. Prosecutors had said she sent Conrad Roy III, 18, numerous text messages urging him to commit suicide.

The case was built largely on Michelle Carter's own words, in the form of hundreds of texts messages exchanged with a vulnerable young man who killed himself in July 2014 by inhaling carbon monoxide in his pickup truck.

More at link:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/us/michelle-carter-texting-case/index.html

Previous thread here:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1102339
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
I shouldn't be but I am fascinated by what a stupid evil pos this woman was. There's nothing involuntary about what she did. She was dozens of texts past "I didn't really think he would do it"
 

Nether!

Member
Reading the article this seems like a complicated decision that is easy to have an opinion on based on only the headline and opening paragraphs but I'm sure was difficult for the judge to make based on the circumstances.
 

-tetsuo-

Unlimited Capacity
I had a good friend kill himself and I thought at the time, if he was able to just talk to me or one of our other friends we would have been able to talk him down. Then, I see shit like this transcript and it just makes me furious. What a pos this girl is.
 

RinsFury

Member
Good, but I don't see what was involuntary about it. I hope she has a long prison sentence ahead of her to think about what she did.
 

Palmer_v1

Member
Good. I was worried the jury might let her get away with it. We needed this case to set an example that this kind of bullshit is not okay.

Edit: NM, seems like it wasn't a trial by jury. Still happy with this result.

I remember this case. Was apprehensive until I read the texts. Yea it was the correct verdict. And I hope it sends a message to other shitty people that you can't verbally push people over the edge like that.

She's a terrible human being.



Her defense requested a bench trial. So it was just the judge. Glad the correct verdict was made.

Yup just saw that. I'm surprised they went for a bench trial. Seems like it would have been more likely to get a hung jury.
 
I remember this case. Was apprehensive until I read the texts. Yea it was the correct verdict. And I hope it sends a message to other shitty people that you can't verbally push people over the edge like that.

She's a terrible human being.

Good. I was worried the jury might let her get away with it. We needed this case to set an example that this kind of bullshit is not okay.

Her defense requested a bench trial. So it was just the judge. Glad the correct verdict was made.
 
I shouldn't be but I am fascinated by what a stupid evil pos this woman was. There's nothing involuntary about what she did. She was dozens of texts past "I didn't really think he would do it"

I haven't followed the case, but according to the article she wasn't fully there after a switch to a new prescription anti-depressant.
 
I was wondering how this case would turn out. Does this set a precedent?

For one, this is Massachusetts state law, so no matter what happens, it's not precedent for any other jurisdiction in the country, but could be persuasive for other jurisdictions to apply the logic used here.

Second, this ruling will surely be appealed the Massachusetts Appeals Court, then to the Massachusetts Supreme Court. That's where precedence will be set for the State of Massachusetts, and either court could overturn the conviction if they do not believe the facts meet the elements required under the criminal law for involuntary manslaughter.

Regardless, this was an awful case, and even if the conviction gets overturned on appeal, states should create legislation in their criminal codes to prevent this kind of behavior. The defendant was practically goading that kid to commit suicide.
 

Hazmat

Member
The guy expressed some fear and doubt about doing it and she pushed him into killing himself. Sounds like the correct verdict to me.
 

Z3K

Member
This was at least documented by the texts she sent, but how many of us have faced this type of psychological warfare in our lives from people that are supposed be our friends/partners/family? But most of it goes undocumented as it was just done verbally to us.

Good call on this judgment I say.
 

Akuun

Looking for meaning in GAF
I don't see how it's involuntary. She's definitely responsible for pushing him to kill himself.

Glad she's convicted, though. What a piece of shit.
 

Yaboosh

Super Sleuth
This was at least documented by the texts she sent, but how many of us have faced this type of psychological warfare in our lives from people that are supposed be our friends/partners/family? But most of it goes undocumented as it was just done verbally to us.

Good call on this judgment I say.

I'm going to assume not that many.
 

MogCakes

Member
This was at least documented by the texts she sent, but how many of us have faced this type of psychological warfare in our lives from people that are supposed be our friends/partners/family? But most of it goes undocumented as it was just done verbally to us.

Good call on this judgment I say.
We live in a society where we are only punished for physical or financial abuse; we are free to psychologically harass others as we please, unfortunately.
 
Good, but I don't see what was involuntary about it. I hope she has a long prison sentence ahead of her to think about what she did.

Well the "involuntary" refers to the actual act of killing, which she didn't directly participate in.

But yeah, she's a fucking bitch and possibly a psycho. Definitely needs prison.
 

Acyl

Member
I just read through the text messages she sent him, damn that is so warped. Just feels weird reading her texts at the end when she pushes him to do it, wtf.
 
We live in a society where we are only punished for physical or financial abuse; we are free to psychologically harass others as we please, unfortunately.

And therein lies the precedent. She wasn't physically at the scene and urged him to commit suicide through online / phone interactions alone. This case allows for further rulings against online bullying and the like, since none of those perpetrators are at the scene as well. The groundwork is set through those actions, and then the victim acts.

People have argued that this is also a violation of her First Amendment rights, because they are her words and not physical actions, but I'm not sure I agree with that argument.
 
I hope she doesn't get too high of a sentence though. The thing in a case like this is that a strong sentence (such as a long prison sentence) doesn't accomplish anything in regards to dissuasion from doing the crime. And this is also not the kind of case in which the accused would commit other offences.

I think three or four years of jail is enough.

Twenty years would be fucking crazy.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
This is likely one of the stepping stones towards legitimizing mental damage as an act of criminal aggression, and will have far reaching consequences for bullying, harassment, as well as America's conceptualization of mental well-being.

Or it could be a one time thing I dunno.
 
Top Bottom