God of War Ragnarok Writer Champions Angrboda as Part of "Our own spin" on Norse mythology

Lunatic_Gamer

Lunatic_Gamer

Member
FmexdpAkjMGRR6YKhesrQB-1024-80.jpg.webp


Matt Sophos worked as a writer and story lead on God of War and, in a Twitter thread, they dismissed spurious claims that the portrayal of Angrboda - a giant known in Norse mythology as the wife of Loki - as a black woman was a political decision or one borne out of outside pressure. He stated that "I can count on two fingers the number of notes we've gotten for story changes to 2018 and GoW Ragnarok combined. This was not one of them."
Click to expand...

As for the suggestion that Ragnarok's version of Angrboda isn't accurate to Norse mythology, Sophos says that God of War "is our interpretation of mythology, not history - Norse or Greek. We tell a personal story with the backdrop of gods, giants etc through our lens. And that lens is not 100% by-the-Eddas."
Click to expand...




Sophos goes on to point out that few of the characters in God of War are particularly accurate to their Norse setting. Blacksmith Brok has blue skin and a Texas accent, while his brother Sindri understands the existence of bacteria. Mimir is Scottish, and tied to a character from English folklore and Shakespeare. Kratos and Atreus are both adapted versions of established mythological figures. Sophos closes his thread by saying that their team has "consistently taken mythological characters and given them our own spin."
Click to expand...

www.gamesradar.com

God of War Ragnarok writer champions Angrboda as part of "our own spin" on Norse mythology

God of War is "our interpretation of mythology, not history"
www.gamesradar.com www.gamesradar.com
 
Last edited:
"Our interpretation" = Secret "diversity" tokenism just to piss people off. haha

They could have made her look more asian if they wanted a less questionable result, since the norse where closer to them, than the Africans.
 
Tbh, I didn't really think about it until it inevitably became an issue with some, and unsurprisingly blown out of all proportions. Just let them make the game they want to make and if you don't like the idea of the game having a mythological black giant, then ignore it and move on.
 
This is one of those things where I wouldn't have thought twice about it if no one brought it up. Does it matter? There are blue dwarves, monsters, fairies, elves…. Omg! An attractive black woman!!? That's not reality!! 🤦‍♂️
 
Last edited:
RoboFu said:
This is one of those things were I wouldn't have thought twice about it if no one brought it up. Does it matter? There are blue dwarves, monsters, fairies, elves…. Omg! An attractive black woman!!? That's not reality!! 🤦‍♂️
Click to expand...
When a blue dwarf is put in a game it is not politically motivated.
When a monster is put in a game it is not politically motivated.
When a fairy is put in a game it is not politically motivated.

When a strong black female is put in a game ........
 
Why not make next GOW game set in Africa with Kratos fighting "spirits" or some shit or just Egypt where it would still make sense for Egyptian gods to be black. It's just plain stupid in Norse mythology.
 
Shit like this shouldn't be a problem in fantasy games so no issue for me.

When they make games that are influenced by REAL events and people and then make changes to fit their narrative is where I'm not a big fan.
 
NikuNashi said:
When a blue dwarf is put in a game it is not politically motivated.
When a monster is put in a game it is not politically motivated.
When a fairy is put in a game it is not politically motivated.

When a strong black female is put in a game ........
Click to expand...

GOW isn't a university course. It's not sponsored by the history channel. There isn't a copy hanging up in the national Nordic museum..,
 
Don't see why this is a problem, it won't suddenly make the game an awful one and at the end of the day it's fantasy. The nay-sayers here would have no issue if the character was green or blue as opposed to black.

I totally get that in some cases tokenism is a real issue, and I have called it out myself when it was as such. But in a fantasy game where you play as a God fighting Dragons and other magical entities it makes no sense to be so pent up by this minor inclusion.
 
Outlier said:
"Our interpretation" = Secret "diversity"
Click to expand...
Yup, let's pretend GOW hasn't been a Greek/Norse mythology interpretation until now.

Armorian said:
It's just plain stupid in Norse
Click to expand...
Were you also concerned when Loki was revealed to be the son of a Greek semigod?

NikuNashi said:
When a strong black female is put in a game...
Click to expand...
it is not politically motivated.

I don't know why some of you are so angry at seeing diversity in fantasy games. I shouldn't have to remind you but here it goes: Mythology is not real
 
Many things were put in a good way as it is but someone dig in there and create an issue from nothing.

can't wait to continue the journey on Ragnarok
 
She came out of nowhere and feels totally out of place.

Just another token black character. Not something that'll harm my enjoyment of the game, but it's kinda funny at this point.
 
Yea definitely not pandering to diversity but sticks a random black character in a significant role lol.

At least own the shit, you look like a clown denying it.
 
I wonder why every time they read about something like 'the one who brings grief', 'she-who-offers-sorrow', or 'harm-bidder', 'mother of monsters' all they can think is black people?
 
Personally, who cares, it's fantasy, but the backdrop here is that if they put a white person as an African god or something, Sony Santa Monica would be first in line to kill people for cultural appropriation. This is obvious ignorant hypocrisy.

It's "our" version of Norse mythology. Yeah, well. I hope they make an Egyptian game next, and half the gods are Japanese, and they go like "it's our version of Egypt". See how that goes over.
 
The only thing i know is that she has by far the most detailed\realistic human face in the whole trailer, little shit and freya looks pretty gamey compared to her, freya had like zero facial upgrades compared to the first game.
 
GymWolf said:
The only thing i know is that she has by far the most detailed\realistic human face in the whole trailer, little shit and freya looks pretty gamey compared to her, freya had like zero facial upgrades compared to the first game.
Click to expand...
That was really my only reaction as well.
 
This subject here is just the same as it would be had they shoehorned an out of place change into another culture's mythology. South or East Asian gods? A white, western god with all the facial features is going to be out of place, even if there's a green god in there. Same for throwing a distinctly Native American character among a group of African gods. It's easy to see why people might think it might be an out of place change. I get that the framework allows for it, but accents are just accents (we also hear the voices in our relevant languages) and a blue character is easily explained when the main character is forever cursed to be ash white from the ashes of his wife and child.

Either way, I'm going to wait and see if there's any relevance or significance to the change before I pass judgement.

For those that think this backlash is borne out of intolerance or is otherwise unjustified, consider that people might not be able to put their finger on why it seems out of place.
 
The tunnel vision of American developers is remarkable, it's like the whole world is America and that basically means adding black people wherever you can. It's funny because if it were some Senegalese, Cambodian or Inuit setting they would feel it's diverse enough (even if actually homogeneous) with an all cast of Senegalese, Cambodian or Inuit people, but alas, not here. Then if you point out this is some immersion breaking nonsense they feel the need to break the news to you that it's just fantasy, that dragons and giant snakes are not real and that the Eddas don't explicitly mention the characters to be white, and of course you must be racist too because you don't like black people. Yes as a creative you can do whatever, but people can laugh at you too.
 
Yoboman said:
Hes better off not addressing it

Hes just adding fuel to the fire
Click to expand...

That's what the SJW types (and the other end of the horseshoe as well, to be fair) are all about.
It's never about convincing anyone.
It's always about clout and fueling the fires.


Pretending that making a character from Norse mythology black is not pure pandering is idiotic. There's literally no other reason to do that.
Pretending that it actually matters in a fantasy game like that is equally idiotic. The game is already so disconnected from "historical"/source accuracy, it wouldn't matter if they brought aliens or clown zombies in.
 
Last edited:
RJMacready73 said:
Please dont tell me people are getting pissed off cause a young POC girl showed up in the trailer?
Click to expand...

Of course they are. Because a lot of people have decided that 'black person included' means 'woke'. Which means that in their desire to fight back against the evil woke monster, they just end up sounding like Klan members 🙄
 
Last edited:
Business said:
The tunnel vision of American developers is remarkable, it's like the whole world is America and that basically means adding black people wherever you can. It's funny because if it were some Senegalese, Cambodian or Inuit setting they would feel it's diverse enough (even if actually homogeneous) with an all cast of Senegalese, Cambodian or Inuit people, but alas, not here. Then if you point out this is some immersion breaking nonsense they feel the need to break the news to you that it's just fantasy, that dragons and giant snakes are not real and that the Eddas don't explicitly mention the characters to be white, and of course you must be racist too because you don't like black people. Yes as a creative you can do whatever, but people can laugh at you too.
Click to expand...

The bottom line is that tokenism is still a thing.

Putting token POC everywhere doesn't make it any more defensible, it actually makes it stand out more when its part of an obvious trend. Which in turn leads to the accusation of opportunistic virtue-signalling.

Now to be honest, I have faith in the GoW creative team to do this properly and from a visual/artistic standpoint I do like their rendition of Angrboda. But that's not enough to summarily discard criticism of the type I mentioned at the top of this post, or to try and portray every person who has issues with it as a bigot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LTTP: God of War Ragnarok (PS4)
2 3
119
5K
HRK69 replied
LTTP : God of War Ragnarok
2
50
3K
Gaiff replied
Tony Soprano in God of War: Ragnarok
5
728
MrTroubleMaker replied
My thoughts on God Of War Ragnarok
2 3
112
8K
xcalibersa replied
[IGN] NORSE: Oath of Blood - Story Teaser
6
173
March Climber replied
Top Bottom