Foliorum Viridum said:Looks pretty lame compared to FB, I'd say.
no games bro.LyleLanley said:What gave you that impression? This seems like a better version of facebook.
DMPrince said:no games bro.
Google+ HAS NO GAMES.DMPrince said:no games bro.
Mik2121 said:Google+ HAS NO GAMES.
Mik2121 said:Google+ HAS NO GAMES.
they'll probably add games when the thing opens up and see how much of a hit this is.thelatestmodel said:Which is wonderful if you ask me. No more dumb game invites!
Hopefully they don't. The website doesn't seem to be build around that kind of stuff at all. Plus, knowing Google, I doubt they would do that.DMPrince said:they'll probably add games when the thing opens up and see how much of a hit this is.
Mistle said:Wait so.... Can I not completely hide everything (except name and DP) from people who I am not following?
Go to privacy settings.Mistle said:Wait so.... Can I not completely hide everything (except name and DP) from people who I am not following?
giga said:I'll be using this a lot.
giga said:I'll be using this a lot.
You can use the circles thing to set some pretty strict hiding and stuff, even stricter then fb... it just seems the defaults are a tad loose.Mistle said:Wait so.... Can I not completely hide everything (except name and DP) from people who I am not following?
Alrighty, I seemed to have set everything so only people in my circles can see them.remz said:You can use the circles thing to set some pretty strict hiding and stuff, even stricter then fb... it just seems the defaults are a tad loose.
GCX said:Am I the only one who's at least a liiiiiittle bothered that if Google+ kicks off Google will probably know more about me than me myself with Google search, Google+, Youtube, Chrome, GMail, Android, etc?
bubnbob said:Can you remove people? I can just "block" them.
Well you could always use different services and not just Google's......GCX said:Am I the only one who's at least a liiiiiittle bothered that if Google+ kicks off Google will probably know more about me than me myself with Google search, Google+, Youtube, Chrome, GMail, Android, etc?
The Financial Times' Tim Bradshaw explains how the "resharing" feature of Google+ negates this considerate privacy feature entirely:
Say a close friend of mine posts a picture of her kids to her "friends" Circle. With the "share" option on every Google+ post, I can reshare this with absolutely anyone, from another Circle to which my friend does not belong, right through to making it completely public. The same loophole applies not just to photos but to any kind of post, as far as I can tell.
If she'd known about this risk (and how would she?), my friend could have disabled resharing using the drop-down menu on the right-hand side of every post, but it doesn't seem to be possible to do this before she'd already published it. Google+ also, for now, lacks any way to turn off resharing of all your posts from within its privacy settings.
xtop said:
WickedAngel said:There is a very clear option to keep people from being allowed to share a post.
That's stated in the article. The problem is that you can't make all your posts disabled for resharing without going through them one by one. You can't even make all future posts resharing disabled by default.WickedAngel said:There is a very clear option to keep people from being allowed to share a post. It's your own damned fault if you don't bother to look into how your content is being made available.
xtop said:
giga said:That's stated in the article. The problem is that you can't make all your posts disabled for resharing without going through them one by one. You can't even make all future posts resharing disabled by default.
giga said:That's stated in the article. The problem is that you can't make all your posts disabled for resharing without going through them one by one. You can't even make all future posts resharing disabled by default.