I literally laughed out loud at this bullshit. It's sick, but it's funny that you would actually say that.
And I shook my head at what you wrote. You understand that, even if you provide the medical bills for the woman till the child is 18 years old, she still needs to provide shelter, food, transportation, clothing, etc. as well? Let's say she gives it up, unless she has a adult that wants the baby right when it's born, it's going to get put into the system. Foster care. In America. So, there goes your loving home theory out the fucking window.
Even if she finds a place for the adoption, it's nine months of brutal physiological, fiscal, and psychological changes due to the development of the various stages of pregnancy. Hormones, blood pressure, rest heart rate, food consumption concerns, the expansion of the womb causing a larger abdominal area, buying clothing, buying food, society's treatment of a single pregnant woman, explaining the circumstance of the pregnancy, the way the body looks after pregnancy etc. We're talking life changing. And you're forcing that experience of the mother because you feel the development of a fetus is more important than the life/quality of life of the mother. Which you think is funny.
You know this is the same, exact argument made (by the pro-choice side) for women who simply don't want it? "inconvenient for my life, can't afford it right now, etc". I don't see how this is any different. But like I said before, I'd be perfectly OK with victims of rape possibly receiving free treatment during pregnancy because 1) they had no say in the matter and 2) they only represent a tiny fraction of women who get abortions so it's not like it would hemorrhage hospitals financially.
How generous of you! "Society wouldn't be too burdened with her medical bills, so I guess we could throw some money her way!" What about the 16 year old kid who has a hook up in high school in May? What about the woman that meets somebody at a bar/club? On vacation somewhere? In college when they're both unemployed? "Fuck em, should have thought about that before having sex." Great job, once again you're putting the life of the fetus over the life of the mother.
I didn't say she had to keep the child. But it's not like you can't keep a child because they were the product of rape. ALL children deserve to be loved, regardless of the circumstances.
Yes, all children do. But that's not what always happens, now is it. You gonna adopt a kid from the orphanage anytime soon? What about kids in the inner city who don't receive love because daddy's not home and momma's working two jobs? You petitioning for the expansion of inner city youth programs? Expansion of free job training programs for parents so they can have a living wage in order to take care of a child to provide this loving household? Subsidizing clothing, housing, healthy food, health care, etc. so the kid can grow up to be a strong boy and go take on the world? Come now, how far does the government have to go, or is your attitude still "fuck it, you have a womb, it's your burden."
So if people made an exception for rape victims, a ban on all other abortions would be OK? Because if not then everything apparently DOES have to be black and white.
It's a awful paradox. Both scenarios are terrible to me.
Oh, please. You serious here?! It's not black and white
for the god damned woman who's carrying a developing fetus in her belly. You a man? 'Cause guess what you will never have to deal abortion. Ever. Like, if you hook up with a girl and you don't know each other, and she has an abortion and never tells you, you'll never be the wiser. It will effect your live 0%. Yet you feel that her having an abortion would be "terrible" because it's a murder? Really? That black and white to ya, eh?
You feel this strong about anything that's murder? You don't like the death penalty? You okay with war? You okay with the US government subsidizing corn leading to an increase in Type II diabetes in children causing health problems and leading to an early death? What about our poor standard of care of the impoverished leading them to death? These could all be considered murder and they're all involved with society as a whole. Think we should poor some money and resources into all that, or are they different? Shades of gray for your personally? Hmm?
Well if that "bad" is considered taking a life, I'm not on board.
Well, good news! Turns out, unless you have a vagina, you never have to have an abortion! You never have to deal with people calling a you a murderer because you're 16 and you aren't ready for a child. Or 22 and just starting a new career, you live with a room mate, and can't take care of a kid yet. Your 27 and you and your husband just don't want to have a child. Insert reason here.
You can sleep soundly, knowing that you'll never be the one paying to have a doctor go inside of you an commit a murder. Ever. Thank god, though, we have people like you out there just waiting to demean and convict these woman of a crime that's of the same level as sneaking into a house and slitting a child's throat. 'Cause, ya know, they're the exact same thing, right?
Seriously, guy. You're being incredibly pretentious and disrespectful. The fact that you're on a "taking a life" kick means you think abortion is legal murder and that anybody engaged in it as a disgusting person. Which is just sad, 'cause you probably know somebody who's had one in their life and is ashamed of it because of what society says about them even though it has no effect on society.
