I dunno. I mean, I hate the fact that people take pictures of totally stupid shit now like their food and shit just because they can but I don't know if I'd blame "selfie culture" on shit at the zoo because that's one of those times where people do bring cameras out, like at the beach, or hiking, or going to a park. Even if this were 20 years ago people'd be taking pictures there just back then they'd be asking a stranger to hold the camera and going through how to work the particular model with the stranger.In this case, selfie culture MAY have been a factor in the parent being too busy taking pics of themselves while their child climbs over the railing.
I really hate how a woman who wanted to bring her children to a zoo is bad. There's all sorts of ranges to "bad parenting" regarding inattentiveness to me ranging from parents who don't give a shit and don't try to do anything inspirational or educational for their children and don't pay attention to them, parents who want to create opportunities for their children by bettering their position and are somewhat forced to leave them to work or find work like that girl who left her kid at a park while she went to an interview and then a parent who's done almost everything right, is trying to take her kids on an educational trip and just loses sight of her kid for a few seconds. Honestly I find it sad. I mean, she's already discounted from parent of the year, sure, but I still don't know that I'd say she's a bad parent. She was actually trying and things just didn't work out.Who do you know she isn't a good parent?
Parenting to me isn't a clear cut thing, she lost sight of her kid, yes, but again, she was taking them out for an educational trip, how many parents do you think never bother to do that with their kids? Would they be better parents by default just because by never taking the kids out they're not really at risk of losing sight of their kid? Since no parent perfect 100% in all areas I, personally, prefer a parent that might lose sight for a second or two but be invested in the kids future and happiness over one who may watch them like a hawk but could not care less about inspiring the kid or it's happiness.
I still don't think we should be hung up on assigning fault. If she never lost sight of her kid the fence wouldn't matter. If the fence was better her losing sight wouldn't have mattered. If the gorillas were never in the zoo neither would have mattered.And could it be possible that it wasn't her inattentiveness, but a bad fence that cost an animal's life?
I don't like calling it a bad fence because, the damn thing worked for longer than I've been alive, nearly 40 years. Could the fence have been better? Sure, but does that mean it was bad before? I don't think so.