..and that's helping make games worse unfortunately. People buy games up front, full price, despite bad practices. I now buy all games I want at a discount, or as cheap as I can if they have things I don't like in them.
See Shadow of War...and I'm sure Battlefront II will sell TONS. I really want BFII....but I'm going to hold off till it's cheaper.
I fully expect GT:S to sell truckloads.
If you cant save your progress you cant play the game. End of story. The edge case of "I can technically boot the game as long as I never turn off my system is some 1985 NES bullS#!t.
Ok, perhaps..>So which racing game would you say is more for casuals this season?GTS is an excellent racing game but based on my very limited experience with it last night, it is not a game for casuals.
I'm not "defending" the way this was implemented but you actually can play a portion of GTS offline. GTS is slightly less restrictive than a server-side game like Destiny, Overwatch or Diablo III PC. It's not ideal, but at least it's something.
I buy console games that require electricity, but not those that require internet. Basically the same thing as vacuum cleaners here.Sometimes electricity goes out. I will not purchase a vacuum cleaner.
Please understand folks.
Gran Turismo is not an MMO though. I do not complain about the online requirements of FF11 / 14, they are inherent to the design and cannot be avoided. But having an optional offline counter for currency is nothing difficult to do or strange thing to ask for. Demanding online for single player content is absolutely unreasonable.I'm only highlighting the second point because on the first point we just fundamentally disagree, there's no conversation to be had there. Not to edit what you're saying.
On point 2...but this is an online game. And you're asking for an offline mode...Fine you like offline games. That's not what this is. So why are you asking for a different game? There's a point where you're no longer criticising the game for its faults, but criticising the game for what it is. I see exactly the same thing with FF14 and FF11 all the time. People criticise those games simple for being MMOs. It's laughable.
I know, you're right but think about it. 15 days of included online gaming is that an unaffordable price to pay or it could give the opportunity to try the online features and maybe appreciate them and buy a full Plus Subscription?
Im really glad I never bought this.
NFS Payback & The Crew 2 in a few more monthsOk, perhaps..>So which racing game would you say is more for casuals this season?
..and that's helping make games worse unfortunately. People buy games up front, full price, despite bad practices. I now buy all games I want at a discount, or as cheap as I can if they have things I don't like in them.
See Shadow of War...and I'm sure Battlefront II will sell TONS. I really want BFII....but I'm going to hold off till it's cheaper.
I fully expect GT:S to sell truckloads.
Is GTS requiring online (the entire focus of the game has been online competitions) really as bad or worse than the loot boxes in other games? Seems like it based on the reactions here.
Cheat prevention alone seems like a valid reason to have this for me.
Ok, perhaps..>So which racing game would you say is more for casuals this season?
If you enjoy "racing" in racing games, then this is the game for you. All I know is that I am immensely enjoying this game. I think about it every moment of my day. I found that I am playing the single player stuff more at the moment rather than going online. The drive of getting golds in all sections and, eventually, trying to be my friends' times on my leaderboard is good fun. I'll eventually fall into playing Sport mode all the time.
Its not the same thing, Overwatch is an online multiplayer game, which is fine. GT:Sport has a single player component which doesn't work if you are offline.
The races are every 20 minutes. You could plan to start one at a specific time and get your 30 minutes in daily
So theoretically, you'd need to wait 20 minutes to race?
So theoretically, you'd need to wait 20 minutes to race?
They actually changed it tonight to every 5 minutes, so it does appear they're listening to feedback.
You have 20 minutes to qualify and set up your car.
That's the point of there being a waiting period before the race.
If you want constant back to back races then there are lobbies for that.
Absolutely. No reason offline progress should require and internet connection.
The game itself lowers the power levels of cars accordingly in online matchups anyways, so that's not really an issue here.The issue is that single player stuff can affect multiplayer.
A good example of this is console Diablo 3. If you play online with randoms, its guaranteed you will mm with someone with modded gear or boosted levels from modded save files.
The issue is that single player stuff can affect multiplayer.
A good example of this is console Diablo 3. If you play online with randoms, its guaranteed you will mm with someone with modded gear or boosted levels from modded save files.
Yeah, just like they forgot for Hitman and need for speed right. Oh wait... one patched out most of its always online stuff and the other had its next entry in the franchise that went out of the way to advertise the game can be played offline.People will get mad, and then forget. No one complains about blizzard games anymore and they had a disastrous diablo launch. And every blizzard launch since has had problems with achievements being missed because of server outages.
Ok, perhaps..>So which racing game would you say is more for casuals this season?
Is GTS requiring online (the entire focus of the game has been online competitions) really as bad or worse than the loot boxes in other games? Seems like it based on the reactions here.
Cheat prevention alone seems like a valid reason to have this for me.
What are you looking for here? What kind of information such a dumb and time wasting task would give us? Is there something in particular you want to prove?Anyone want to do the rounds on the Xbone announcement thread on a per username basis with regards to this thread ?
Ok, perhaps..>So which racing game would you say is more for casuals this season?
Got to still be Forza Horizon.
Anyone want to do the rounds on the Xbone announcement thread on a per username basis with regards to this thread ?
No idea, do they want to compare the people who are against this here and see if they were against it there. Do they think that the people that are against it here were defending the xbox stance in that thread (basically implying xbox fans are the ones bringing up an issue with a playstation exclusive)? No idea what they want to accomplish.What are you looking for here? What kind of information such a dumb and time wasting task would give us? Is there something you want to prove?
Is GTS requiring online (the entire focus of the game has been online competitions) really as bad or worse than the loot boxes in other games? Seems like it based on the reactions here.
Cheat prevention alone seems like a valid reason to have this for me.
People will get mad, and then forget. No one complains about blizzard games anymore and they had a disastrous diablo launch. And every blizzard launch since has had problems with achievements being missed because of server outages.
No saves? Fuck off.
These kind of games need a "Requires Plus membership" sticker on the cover.
$60 for a demo, disgusting.
Wow, that's some real BS. so I can't play even the singleplayer mode of a game I paid for because the network is offline. Great.
Lootboxes are definitely worse. Being unable to play for a small fraction of the time due to connectivity issues is a con for GTS still.Is GTS requiring online (the entire focus of the game has been online competitions) really as bad or worse than the loot boxes in other games? Seems like it based on the reactions here.
Cheat prevention alone seems like a valid reason to have this for me.
Why can't I play Overwatch offline? I hate you Blizzard.