I think its because they were saved as massive 30mb files.
SlimySnake
suggested so Im not sure why they're so big. WIll try again tmrw
lol I dont know why the look like that, but I told you not to create these giant 30 MB gifs. Thats three of them. Thats almost 100 MB. On the top of the page. going to make this whole page miserable to browse now.
Not only that, it looks like the tod is also dynamic. It looks really good, better than the older 2 video's. There are still some part where it looks average but the overall visuals and traversal upgrades are a good step up from there last gen game. Day one for me as im a huge Spidey fan.I really like the mid day lighting here in 'some' shots. It doesnt always show, but I noticed a pretty significant leap over the harsh baked feel of the first game's mid day lighting. This has this really soft look to it at least when spiderman goes into his special moves. doesnt really pop in other shots in the trailer when hes swinging around, but its still a noticeable upgrade from the first game.
Here is the same time of day from Spiderman 1.
SlimySnake
will feel proper burned by this massive downgrade.It's PS4?
ChiefDada
Afterwards, I would like anyone to gladly explain to me how SM2's last gen lighting and geometry looks like this.
I'm so confused, are people supposed to be going goo goo gaga over a splash of new grungy brick wall paint and foliage that look like 2d cards? It looks like miles morale with new textures. Was the showing better than what they showed at E3, yes but its a PS4 game through and through.
Just to get people to understand what I mean, compare the cloudy and night bridge scene (at 14 secs, 38 secs and 39 secs) from that video to this below.
This a video of the Matrix demo running real-time native 4k at 50fps. Watch it all the way through at 4k full screen with sound. Sure its not as art directed as the colorful spiderman with trees, plants and props. But there is a grand canyon gap in lighting and geometry density. Its not even close. Look at the scene under the bridge, notice the gradient darkness and then the warm glow as you look beyond from under the bridge. This is what realistic lighting looks like.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST
UNTIL YOU WATCHED THE ENTIRE 6 MINS AT 4K WITH AUDIO
Afterwards, I would like anyone to gladly explain to me how SM2's last gen lighting and geometry looks like this.
I'm so confused, are people supposed to be going goo goo gaga over a splash of new grungy brick wall paint and foliage that look like 2d cards? It looks like miles morale with new textures. Was the showing better than what they showed at E3, yes but its a PS4 game through and through.
Just to get people to understand what I mean, compare the cloudy and night bridge scene (at 14 secs, 38 secs and 39 secs) from that video to this below.
This a video of the Matrix demo running real-time native 4k at 50fps. Watch it all the way through at 4k full screen with sound. Sure its not as art directed as the colorful spiderman with trees, plants and props. But there is a grand canyon gap in lighting and geometry density. Its not even close. Look at the scene under the bridge, notice the gradient darkness and then the warm glow as you look beyond from under the bridge. This is what realistic lighting looks like.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST
UNTIL YOU WATCHED THE ENTIRE 6 MINS AT 4K WITH AUDIO
Afterwards, I would like anyone to gladly explain to me how SM2's last gen lighting and geometry looks like this.
Why does it look dynamic tod to you?
In the latest footage you can notice lots of different tod/weather settings. Also in one of the earlier video's the sun was moving. The engine already supported dynamic tod since Miles but it was limited by PS4. Also the old games had 3 tod presets, it would take lot of storage to put this many tod baked lighting settings.
Just watched the videos.
Spiderman 2 got an upgrade, just not a significant one and still looks like a cross gen game. The only real improvement I see a slightly better lighting. The pop in is still bad. Character models are poor for next gen as are the graphics in general.
Avatar... Damn, it looks no better than Far Cry 6 at this point, just more vegetation. Really starting to worry about Outlaws, although that does seem to run on a much more upgraded engine with next gen features, but who knows at this point.
Ghostrunner 2 looks stellar, nothing else to say
But I swear you were showering the “last abysmal showing” with praises on loop alongside ChiefDada?
This, right here, looks fantastic.
The speed of movement. The amount of car traffic, both fantastic. There was some pretty good shit especially near the end of the trailer. And a few snippets of night.
Its definitely been polished up since the last abysmal showing.
Couldn't have put it better myself!
Tis new spiderman 2 footage wipes the floor with avatar. The game, like I predicted, got the u is soft special. While spiderman 2 got an upgrade.
Not at all, I was one of the most harsh critics here on the first showing
The only games that don’t look like glorified ps4 games all gen to me are space marine 2, burning shores, and possibly Alan wake 2. I’m taking what I can get with this.
The lighting here is
I love twiter console wars lol
edit: tweets dont automatically embed now?
The lighting here is
Yeah dont fall for that PR. This game is coming to other platforms in just 3 months. Very short timed exclusivity period. My guess is switch 2 and pc. Watch this run on HDD just fine on PC.
Apparently that avatar footage is from the 60 fps mode on PS5. I am surprised they even got it working for a next gen open world game, but its obvious they had to downgrade a lot. You can see FSR artifacts that show either performance mode or maybe even utlra performance mode we saw in Immortals. So 720p base compared to the 1440p base we saw in the E3 30 fps ps5 footage.Just watched the videos.
Spiderman 2 got an upgrade, just not a significant one and still looks like a cross gen game. An improved lighting is the only real upgrade that stands out. The pop in is still bad. Character models are poor for next gen.
Avatar... Damn, it looks no better than Far Cry 6 at this point, just more vegetation. Really starting to worry about Outlaws, although that does seem to run on a much more upgraded engine with next gen features, but who knows at this point.
Ghostrunner 2 looks stellar, nothing else to say.
Burning shores is literally a glorified ps4 game with PS5 clouds though
wccftech.com
Spiderman PS4 vs PS5 vs Matrix vs Movie CG Comparison
Matrix comes the closest to matching the CG in the movie, but honestly, it's closer to the Matrix than I originally thought. The ray traced reflections and lighting are there but the asset quality of buildings hold it back.
no one is even talking about lack of 60 fps in starfield. that was a big news story for like a week back at E3. i think sony first party needs to go back to their roots. just go fidelity over everything. with the pro coming out soon, they can just say buy a ps5 pro for 60 fps.
I legit laughed when this came up. Straight up ps3 quality. I noticed these in a couple of scenes in the first game too. Its when they go into a large area, they reduce the LODs on these characters by a massive amount. very rare but i had wished that the ps5 was letting them go with high quality models at all times. I guess they just dont have the rendering budget on a 10 tflops GPU with their engine and all the other stuff going on the screen. bet they are targeting 60 fps too. FF7 ran at 1440p 60 fps on the PS5.I'm loving the locations, I'll say that the shadow rendering is pretty meh a lot of the time (Zero shadows for grass and lots of unshadowed objects in every shot)
and stuff like this
We got 5 months though, hoping fo the best
