In all fairness the non Raytraced Alan Wake has superior lighting to TLOU2/TLOU Remake during gameplay.Again, nothing you're sharing here is particularly impressive or revelatory.
TLOU (or any not-RT) game is just not accomplishing anything like what AW is accomplishing as far as lighting/shadows/reflections go:
You were just arguing that it was 100% from the game? Why a sudden change of heart?
No this is what the actual game looks like.
The term "CG" simply indicates its not real-time or not intended for real-time.
No this is what the actual game looks like.
Absent is all those dozens of added EXPENSIVE shadow casting lights.
Replacing the 512 to 1k textures with 4k cloth, face, eyes, skin, props textures.
Using cinematic lighting and shading settings.
And just to point out, cinematic settings IS NOT cut-scene.
Cut-scenes run on the actual settings of the game which are most times low/medium depending on the console game.
Unreal Engine for example has low, medium, high, epic (ultra) and then cinematic.
So no, calling this "in-engine real-time cutscene" would waive away all the huge texture, lighting and material changes that been done just to prepare this one single frame.
Its not a cutscene, its simple a picture for a portfolio piece that's done ALL the time.
You either use solo of your character or you use a cutscene shot of your character within a scene.
The term "CG" simply indicates its not real-time or not intended for real-time.
Notice I didn't say it "looks CG" but that IT IS CG!
It should as Alan Wake is a newer game design with faster hardware in mind.
Your screenshot is a freaking screenshot from a crap ass Youtube video. Its compressed to hell. Therefore its missing a SHITLOAD of details. Get real.No this is what the actual game looks like.
Absent is all those dozens of added EXPENSIVE shadow casting lights.
Replacing the 512 to 1k textures with 4k cloth, face, eyes, skin, props textures.
Using cinematic lighting and shading settings.
And just to point out, cinematic settings IS NOT cut-scene.
Cut-scenes run on the actual settings of the game which are most times low/medium depending on the console game.
Unreal Engine for example has low, medium, high, epic (ultra) and then cinematic.
So no, calling this "in-engine real-time cutscene" would waive away all the huge texture, lighting and material changes that been done just to prepare this one single frame.
Its not a cutscene, its simple a picture for a portfolio piece that's done ALL the time.
You either use solo of your character or you use a cutscene shot of your character within a scene.
The term "CG" simply indicates its not real-time or not intended for real-time.
Notice I didn't say it "looks CG" but that IT IS CG!
There is 0 reason that shadow couldn't be baked in since that curtain is still.Again, nothing you're sharing here is particularly impressive or revelatory.
TLOU (or any not-RT) game is just not accomplishing anything like what AW is accomplishing as far as lighting/shadows/reflections go:
Dude I don't even know if you are being serious right now.
None of the shots she posted are "in-game". Calling those "in game" is like calling these "in-game".
poorly compressed? Dude she even posted a comparison between PS4/PS5 of that very scene.
wtf are you doing man. stopNo this is what the actual game looks like.
Absent is all those dozens of added EXPENSIVE shadow casting lights.
Replacing the 512 to 1k textures with 4k cloth, face, eyes, skin, props textures.
Using cinematic lighting and shading settings.
And just to point out, cinematic settings IS NOT cut-scene.
Cut-scenes run on the actual settings of the game which are most times low/medium depending on the console game.
Unreal Engine for example has low, medium, high, epic (ultra) and then cinematic.
So no, calling this "in-engine real-time cutscene" would waive away all the huge texture, lighting and material changes that been done just to prepare this one single frame.
Its not a cutscene, its simple a picture for a portfolio piece that's done ALL the time.
You either use solo of your character or you use a cutscene shot of your character within a scene.
The term "CG" simply indicates its not real-time or not intended for real-time.
Notice I didn't say it "looks CG" but that IT IS CG!
Represent.
ChiefDada
I don't know what's happening in this thread anymore man. Maybe it's time we leave.
Didn't the original TLOU use pre-rendered cutscenes until Naughty Dog started using real-time cutscenes in their next game?Dude I don't even know if you are being serious right now.
None of the shots she posted are "in-game". Calling those "in game" is like calling these "in-game".
poorly compressed? Dude she even posted a comparison between PS4/PS5 of that very scene.
yes. Starting from UC4, cutscenes are all realtime aside from very few minor scenes transitions in uc4.
what artists renders. it's real time graphics. half of the shots Iv;e posted on this and last page are not even from a cutscene (which are real time. You can change parameters when you pause)If you're planning on continuing posting artist renders and pretending that they are representative of the final game?
TLOU cinematics look amazing as they are. There's no reason for that. It brings the conversation down.
I did. he posted one shot that was from an ad. big wow since it looks like that in game...
it does and I've proven it by posting my screenshots which are not from any artist portfolio.It doesn't and it was proven. Seriously, there's no need for that. Like we've said: game looks amazing as it is. No need to post bullshot renders from artist portfolio that look nowhere close to how the game actually is.
And if you don't see a problem with that, then to answer your previous question: YES
Represent.
posted.
it does and I've proven it by posting my screenshots which are not from any artist portfolio.
I don't know about the dlc shots but i have shots from main game.
Look at my post on this and last page with shots... oh such a poor fake ads/art portfolio.
You must feel really cool posting gif of that door over and over again
and then you post a fucking mushy jpg from yt video thinking you've proven anything. you are a fraud. Launch the game, play it in quality mode and then take a screenshot.
and you totally ignore all the other amazing shots that I and
I am not accepting that. YT vids are compressed. That vid is compressed, your shots are therefore also compressed.
I've played the game and posted ton of shots on this and last page.
No you wont. Because when I post this, you ignore it and post another stupid compressed Youtube video
No you wont. Because when I post this, you ignore it and post another stupid compressed Youtube video
This is what the game looks like when playing on a TV.
Not your trash compressed videos. Facts
His shot looks better.That game = Forspoken.
Listen dude, we all agree that cinematics in TLOU games are second to none. We're just arguing about principle of using bullshots and trying to pass them as in-game footage as experienced in the final game.
Does the game looks like this (posted by you, of course):
Duplicate this shot in the game, then we'll talk.
Not wanting to get involved in this argument but is this a shot of a cutscene using photo mode? If it is does the game improve the image in photo mode?No you wont. Because when I post this, you ignore it and post another stupid compressed Youtube video
This is what the game looks like when playing on a TV.
Not your trash compressed videos. Facts
Yes. Play it on Vivid mode, it looks the exacts same.That game = Forspoken.
Listen dude, we all agree that cinematics in TLOU games are second to none. We're just arguing about principle of using bullshots and trying to pass them as in-game footage as experienced in the final game.
Does the game looks like this (posted by you, of course):
Duplicate this shot in the game, then we'll talk.
I don't think so. I posted few shots above.
The shot you and him are posting are not from the same scene and frame in the game.
