Like I said. There should not even be a 2D version of this shown in theaters. Its a disgrace.3D blows.
Like I said. There should not even be a 2D version of this shown in theaters. Its a disgrace.3D blows.
3D blows.
Like I said. There should not even be a 2D version of this shown in theaters. Its a disgrace.
3D blows.
At least I don't look like a nerd.
That would be horrible. Forcing me to watch 3D? Yuuuuuuck.
Just do it.I want to see the movie again, and I may see it in 3D. Though I've never seen a movie in 3D that has made me want to ever see it again in 3D.
I want to see the movie again, and I may see it in 3D. Though I've never seen a movie in 3D that has made me want to ever see it again in 3D.
No offense, Sculli, but now I'm having second thoughts cause you suggested it!Just do it.
I just watched it.
Amazing.
Probably my favorite Hollywood movie in years. The last time I came out of a theater feeling this excited was after Children of Men, and this movie is probably better.
I didn't even know these two movies were by the same director until I saw you mention Children of Men as well. I just mentioned it because it really was the last film to come to mind where I felt this blown away.I think it's as good as Children of Men. And now I want an astronaut simulation video game, like Endless Horizon without guns.
I really like Gravity, but I don't think it's up there with Children of Men.
I really like Gravity, but I don't think it's up there with Children of Men.
So, excuse what must sound like an anachronism at this point, but is 3D a viable option for someone who wears glasses? I was thinking of going to the 2D showings as usual, but people seem to love the 3D...
So, excuse what must sound like an anachronism at this point, but is 3D a viable option for someone who wears glasses? I was thinking of going to the 2D showings as usual, but people seem to love the 3D...
So, excuse what must sound like an anachronism at this point, but is 3D a viable option for someone who wears glasses? I was thinking of going to the 2D showings as usual, but people seem to love the 3D...
I really like Gravity, but I don't think it's up there with Children of Men.
What was with all the Sandra Bullock dislike before the film? I think this was the first film I have seen her in, and she was fantastic.
My wife put her 3D glasses right over her normal ones. And she has fairly thick frames.
Gotta wear the glasses over the glasses. It makes it initially disorienting for about 15 minutes but you'll get used to it, the eyestrain will suck if you haven't experienced a 3D movie before, but since this is a short film as is, it won't be too bad. Had no issues today this time around, sometimes though the experience is less than pleasant.
Yes. I wear glasses, the 3D glasses fit over them. It might be a little more cumbersome than otherwise (so if you can wear contacts, I would) but other than that... not a problem.
Prepare for gold.
And to duck
i was just sure there was no way this can match what people were saying about it
nope nope nope, just astonishing
And, I think personally, it had the visual effect scene I now consider the most impressive of any movie I've seen whenthe ISS starts getting hit with debris and crumbling apart. The level of detail, the jaw dropping amount of detritus, the perfect audio cut out and image of the destruction behind Sandra Bullock. Amazing.
Also, Sandra Bullock finally surprised me in something. She was good!
I don't know yet, unfortunately. Maybe I'll see it tomorrow...So was I right?
So, are the trailers just not indicative of the film or what?
Because i was really underwhelmed by them, but seeing this much praise confuses me.
Children of Men is the better story, Gravity is the better film.I really like Gravity, but I don't think it's up there with Children of Men.
For real. I think I was mouthing "holy fuck" nonstop to myself during that scene.