Silly.Mikey
Banned
The last thing H4 needs at this point, is 2 separate playlists for social and ranked. Too little too late.
The thing is, even in halo 3, social btb, objective, social slayer it was all still competetively viable. It was fair and consistent.The last thing H4 needs at this point, is 2 separate playlists for social and ranked. Too little too late.
I haven't read all the posts but I am pro ranked/social divide.
Personally I don't see what all the fuss is about with too many playlists, if the game is enjoyable enough to sustain a large population, it really is not a problem. Halo 3 in its prime had a ton of playlists and it worked well. I think the fact there was so many playlists and there was a ranked/ social divide meant that there was a larger population who enjoyed that feature sustaining the game.
Yeah Halo sucks now so more playlists equals larger search times, but a good Halo game can support it, and having it can lead to a higher population.
Im pretty sure by the time I would finish saying "one shot my X", my X will be gone.
I don't care, give me playlists without guests, good quit penalties, no JIP, 1-50 ranking and I don't care anymore for the remaining players in other listsRanked / Social split solves nothing and just creates a split in the playerbase for gametypes.
Im pretty sure by the time I would finish saying "one shot my X", my X will be gone.
Halo 3 tended to stay around 12 playlists and couldn't support more than 16. Reach had 26 at one time, which was the maximum amount the game supported. Even at it's height, Halo 3 coudn't support 2 BTBs. Halo 2 couldn't support 2 BTBes either. Heck, they even tried it with Reach, and Reach's second BTB didn't last long either.
It's probably going to be the same story with Halo 4, eventually there'll be another BTB and it'll eventually be deleted because everyone wants to play the BTB they already had. Halo doesn't really gel with having a rolodex full of playlists to choose from.
edit: also, Barlow noticed that the rocks on the edge of the island in Forge Island are actually hovering above the ground. Now I can't unsee it every time I'm on the map.
Foundation was set by other people who had the experience of 5 other Halo games under their belt, not a completely new studio.
Some people learn from other peoples mistakes and some people need to make them. 343 isn't a carbon copy of Bungie.
I would add Squad Battle 6v6 to ranked.
That was my #1 playlist in Halo 3.
all their playlist exp and so on was invested into regular BTB at that point.
This is a thing Halo 4 has going for it. They don't have anchors to a specific playlist.
Abandon is an anchor to every playlist in features in.
Abandon is an anchor to every playlist in features in.
Anchor is a bad metaphor for dropped population anyway. It's more like a millstone/anvil tied round the ankle while trying to swim.
If the base game is good and there's a nice set of weapons at our disposal, we should not need something like MLG, or Throwdown. They were both added in Halo 3, Reach and Halo 4 because the base settings in those games were not up to par; each game they've decreased melee strength, increased the damage modifier, and increased the walking speed. Not to mention removed equipment, and heavily restricted the usage of armor abilities. We should already have a good speed, melee, and strafe in place so those are not needed to be altered to make sure we'll get a good gaming experience. If not then it'll be just like those past three games and we'll have the saving grace be the MLG/Throwdown/Hardcore playlist. It really should not come down to that.Ranked:
FFA
Slayer
Snipes
MLG
Objective
Social:
FFA
Slayer
BTB
Swat
Action Sack
Multi Team.
lol ME TOO!!!Destiny is where I've transfered all my blind faith and rabid fanboy hype, heh.
lol ME TOO!!!
I was using it as in "the person isn't anchored to that playlist because that person has no specific number (like EXP) keeping them there."
If that makes sense.
Kinda like how most of the population that bought Halo 4 aren't anchored to playing the game because it's bad, right?
:lolI jestNot exactly sure why I wrote 'jest' in particular but I'll go with it anywaysmh
I think most of us have.
I was using it as in "the person isn't anchored to that playlist because that person has no specific number (like EXP) keeping them there."
If that makes sense.
Happy Easter, all that jazz.
I miss you and your gif spam, Moa.
Times have changed, I can PM you any gifs you like on a daily basis though
In other news I personally think they need to go back to Ranked and Social. It's a clear way to communicate to the player base what is going on in each playlist, what to expect, etc. Giving everything a trendy name like Arena, Throwdown, Classic, Inifity, etc., just muddies the water and doesn't communicate with the audience.
http://www.halocouncil.com/2013/03/31/silentium-glyph-code-2-50k-xp-emblem-video/
Happy Easter, all that jazz.
PS: Dunno if the code has been posted yet.
I will care about my CSR in Halo 4...but only for like 2 playlists. There's no way I'm going to grind to 50 in any playlists other than Doubles & Throwdown. Just about everything else would be a nightmare in heavy competitive play.
http://www.halocouncil.com/2013/03/31/silentium-glyph-code-2-50k-xp-emblem-video/
Happy Easter, all that jazz.
PS: Dunno if the code has been posted yet.
Just wondering, did 343i ever say CSR was 1-50?
haha why should I have to ask this
I'm pretty sure they did. I forgot where they said it, though.
I'm pretty sure they did. I forgot where they said it, though.
They said it at the GDC panel and a few times before.
Standard 1-50 like H2 and H3 ()not in-game
YOLO
IM DED
YOLO
IM DED
Is there a Spartan Ops mission with 30 Watchers? Or a short mission with many watches?
The worst and possibly best first post.
This spreadsheet might help: https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=A39C946A316F7935!217&app=ExcelIs there a Spartan Ops mission with 30 Watchers? Or a short mission with many watches?
u mad cuz ur bad
fight me