Thirty7ven
Banned
I gave it a fair shake, 5 episodes is more than enough. As an adaptation, it's awful. As a compelling story, it's awful. As a sci fi tv show, maybe it works for under 20s who haven't seen enough, but for me? I'm out.
I gave it a fair shake, 5 episodes is more than enough. As an adaptation, it's awful. As a compelling story, it's awful. As a sci fi tv show, maybe it works for under 20s who haven't seen enough, but for me? I'm out.
He tells the person doing this for cbs manually if they do it again he’s taking them to court and tells them to back the fuck off.
Empty threat that likely isn't going anywhere. And knowing him and the massive urge (financial) he would have to spread a lot of negativity around this show, I for one am glad I'm not giving any of his videos the time of day.
This won’t work out the way Joe imagines on his head as a heroic crusader against a massive corporation. Viacom is one of the companies you don’t fuck with when it comes to copyright claims on YouTube. Hell he could end up losing his whole channel just to post clips from a show and shit on it.That guy is a retarded tool but he has every right to put his mental diarrhea up on YouTube
I've watched his reviews and all his comments are actually true, same for what alex and OJ say.Empty threat that likely isn't going anywhere. And knowing him and the massive urge (financial) he would have to spread a lot of negativity around this show, I for one am glad I'm not giving any of his videos the time of day.
You need to watch the latest episode.Its likely that this season we will only see the prophets and elites, likely due to budget constraints, action scenes against the covenant are nearly non existent. Maybe if we are lucky next season we will see grunts, jackals, and hunters?
I've watched his reviews and all his comments are actually true, same for what alex and OJ say.
Well I am a fan of everything that is sci-fi and also a halo fan. And as long as a sci-fi game that I consider as good I will play it. So this show is everyhing I wanted from a tv show. So I do not agree.I gave it a fair shake, 5 episodes is more than enough. As an adaptation, it's awful. As a compelling story, it's awful. As a sci fi tv show, maybe it works for under 20s who haven't seen enough, but for me? I'm out.
So now we are comparing copyright infringement to another company abusing fair use??This won’t work out the way Joe imagines on his head as a heroic crusader against a massive corporation. Viacom is one of the companies you don’t fuck with when it comes to copyright claims on YouTube. Hell he could end up losing his whole channel just to post clips from a show and shit on it.
The guy from Geeks and Gamers dared Sony to ban his Twitter account for posting TLOU2 leaks. Well Sony took that dare and he got banned.
So now we are comparing copyright infringement to another company abusing fair use??
"Courts typically focus on whether the use of copyright-protected material is “transformative.” This means whether the use adds new expression or meaning to the original material, or whether it merely copies from the original.Angry Joe's monetized videos shitting on a TV show don't fall under fair use protection. YouTube's policy is pretty clear on it.
Fair use on YouTube - YouTube Help
Fair use is a legal doctrine that says use of copyright-protected material under certain circumstances is allowed without permission from the copyright holder. YouTube gets many requests to remove visupport.google.com
Angry Joe's monetized videos shitting on a TV show don't fall under fair use protection. YouTube's policy is pretty clear on it.
Fair use on YouTube - YouTube Help
Fair use is a legal doctrine that says use of copyright-protected material under certain circumstances is allowed without permission from the copyright holder. YouTube gets many requests to remove visupport.google.com
"Courts typically focus on whether the use of copyright-protected material is “transformative.” This means whether the use adds new expression or meaning to the original material, or whether it merely copies from the original.
Commercial uses are less likely to be considered fair use, but it’s still possible to monetize a video that contains fair use material."
"For example, in the United States, works of commentary, criticism"
How was he using the clips to "harm" the series? Please explain"Uses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from their original work are less likely to be fair uses."
And that's where he loses the fight. Very easy for CBS to argue that he was intentionally trying to harm the series with how he was using the clips.
He could avoid it by turning off the ads on the videos, but that defeats the whole purpose right there.
How was he using the clips to "harm" the series? Please explain
So you mean joe offered fair criticism for a TV series review format like every other fucking review under the sun, which falls under CRITICISM and COMMENTARY for fair use purposes.To discourage people from watching it? Less people watching (and subbing to Paramount+) thus harms their profits, and that's what they would argue here.
Imagine if every media company could just claim your video for a bad review.
No they can't under fair use lawsThey can.
Then fair use reviews are impossible. Do you believe that's fair?To discourage people from watching it? Less people watching (and subbing to Paramount+) thus harms their profits, and that's what they would argue here.
Then fair use reviews are impossible. Do you believe that's fair?
Of course, you didn't watch his review, how predictable. Each member points out what they don't like and what they like for a final verdict at the end. TV clips are interspersed to give context to their points about the show's quality with interjections of humor. If you actually watched the review you would know Joe has been the most leint of the series compared to his friends. Joe never mentions "SJW's" and "woke agenda." Please try harder.There's a thin line between a "review" and a YouTube video made for monetized outrage views to piss people off about a movie/tv show. Why do you think a lot of those MCU/Star Wars channels don't use actual clips from the movies while on their daily "SJWs are destroying Marvel" rants? Because they know Disney will fuck them up the ass.
If the line is so thin, how do you safely make a distinction? If you make a distinction between people being falsely negative, do you also make a distinction between people being falsely positive?There's a thin line between a "review" and a YouTube video made for monetized outrage views to piss people off about a movie/tv show.
I ran a YouTube channel and dealt with copyright with Disney stuff, which is even stricter than CBS, so yes. A friend of mine got banned for a 3 second clip from Mando S1.Do you even know what fair use means?
Their ep1 review is untouched
Well I am a fan of everything that is sci-fi and also a halo fan. And as long as a sci-fi game that I consider as good I will play it. So this show is everyhing I wanted from a tv show. So I do not agree.
Episode five finally, FINALLY shows a real deal
Good stuff:
the action in the third act is fucking great! I mean, my heart skipped a beat when Master Chief says "spartans, get in" [to the Warthog]
I also really loved the enemies and their ships showing while the spartans fighting them.
Bad stuff:
Lots of cliches like "you're the reason that we are alive" thing, the convenience that only when Master Chief wakes up that things, the artifact secure... A plot still is kinda boring. B plot with the girl and the guy at Madrigal is very short this episode and adds basically nothing - for better or worse. C plot with the other spartans are too shallow this time, and the thing with Kai being excluded and then called back minutes later is dumb writing
Oh just wait for the gushing over TLOU series.There are legit people in here likely not watching the show, but are saying it sucks over Xbox, and you know it.
Oh just wait for the gushing over TLOU series.
Let me explain how writing works:There are legit people in here likely not watching the show, but are saying it sucks over Xbox, and you know it.c
It is not dumb writing because Kai-125 is a Petty Officer First Class who was given a direct order by an officer with the rank of Commander. Miranda as a Naval Officer at the rank of Commander outranks even the Master Chief himself. She's only a single rank below her father, who is a Captain.
The first thing Kai tried to do was obey Master Chief's orders. She got on Miranda's ship and immediately suggested to Miranda they needed to get the ship out of there because they have no air support. She was then countered by Miranda who directly told her that she's not leaving, and that Kai is to join the fight, to which she Kai obeyed. But before Kai dared risk being seen as going against a direct order from the Master Chief, she first sought out the Master Chief's direct approval of her joining the fight by presenting herself before him and saying simply "Chief" basically seeking his explicit permission, a permission he immediately then granted by issuing her orders to "stay back with the marines and keep us covered."
The writing is all on point if you pay close attention to the details. Master Chief also issued those orders to her at a time when they likely weren't expecting a Covenant assault as relentless as the one that showed up. They expected a smaller Covenant force, one they would simply overwhelm with all the might they had gathered in the area, but what they got instead was a much more formidable force that clearly came with such a force because they had knowledge of the importance of what they were coming to collect. The UNSC were expecting the typical covenant patrol or presence, not an organized assault led by clearly one of their very best, which appeared to be that brute they sent in.
They miscalculated that the Covenant, with help from Makee (who they still don't know much of anything about), would gain so much knowledge of their location and its importance by way of their attempt to remove the artifact.
Let me explain how writing works:
1 - you're in a comfort zone, which is the dialogue with Master Chief
2 - you create a diversion, which is the "go sit there, blondie"
3 - you develop a reason for changing this diversion, which takes time and effort; which doesn't happen because everything tooks just a few minutes to change
4 - the diversion changes and it has a payoff
So yes, it's lazy bad pacing writing
And that concerns us about the China tea becauseYou were lazy by not taking the time to learn about the Halo Universe extended fiction and what it's all about beyond just the games. If you did that you would have known how storytelling is done in the Halo Universe extended fiction. What's present in this TV Series so far is the kind of stuff we get from the best books.
In a spaSo much boring, shitty, unnecessary, non-canon exposition.
I just wanna see Spartans and jackals and grunts and brutes going at it.
She wants to get close to the artifact to get the location of the Halo. She also want to kill chief.At least no sign of kwan anymore. Did anyone actually wonder why the covenant would just drop this random lady of? What did she mean with 'make it look good' before they dropped her out in the previous episode. She had 0 signs of injury.