A gram of DNA seems like a hell of a lot of DNA.
What does a gram of DNA even look like? If somebody could answer this question without porn, it would be appreciated.
Eh, you can easily get almost gram or 2 of plasmid DNA out of a MaxiPrep. It doesn't look like much, just a white pellet at the bottom of a tube, or translucent, thread-like stuff if suspended.
Seriously, though, science is fucking awesome. Imagine explaining to someone one hundred years ago that we are now able to store data in DNA. You'd be laughed at and labeled a madman. It would be incomprehensible.
I had no idea DNA had a weight.
fuck, and then theyre going to put it in our foods
what happens if i eat it
I can't wait to buy low quality Seagate DNA.
Everything with mass has a weight
I have some bad news for you. All food has DNA in it.
Just think... I wiped up around 3,500TB of of potential data onto a tissue and threw it in the trash this morning. That would contain, like all of Wikipedia and the library of congress several times over. The entirety of human knowledge!
It is pretty astonishing that in 100 years we've gone from knowing nothing about DNA to being able to use it as a storage medium for immense amounts of digital data.First you'd need to explain DNA
I'm not a biologist so can someone explain why DNA is incredibly stable that it could last hundereds of years in a garage, according to the article? Something to do with the strong hydrogen bonds?
Also, how exactly would the DNA interact with electrical equipment to synthesise and decode the DNA?
I actually find this really cool, but what's next? Biological logic gates? lol
Instead of dying, it'll get cancer.
DNA is double stranded. Each strand is bound to the other by hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are fairly weak. They can be broken by heat.
Each strand, however, is stabilized by phosphodiester bonds (essentially, a type of covalent bond where one phosphorus atom is bound to two oxygens). The bonds link the nucleotides (building blocks of DNA) together in a fairly stable manner. As well, the sugars that make up the nucleotides (nucleotides are composed of 3 parts: sugar, phosphate, and nitrogenous bases) lack an oxgen at the 2' (pronounced 2-prime) position. This prevents auto-cleavage (which is incidentally why RNA is not very stable) by a process that involves organic chemistry and nucleophiles and stuff.
As a result, the only real ways to degrade DNA would be to use enyzmes (like nucleases) to cut the bonds or subject them to mutagens (things that promote mutation of DNA).
Brilliant.fuck, and then theyre going to put it in our foods
Thanks! So would the process of destroying the DNA strands of the storage device (i.e. deleting the data) be done with enzymes? I can't see any other way unless they plan on turning hard drives into carcinogens by using mutagens (lol) so it seems sort of... impractical. But maybe they just point to the storage space as no longer being used with pointers, just like a normal hard drive.
so when are they going to release a reasonably-priced dna external hard drive?
Your body will digest it like any other time you eat DNA
I can't wait to buy low quality Seagate DNA.
I wish there was a way to quantify how many petabytes of information are ingested during the average bukkake.
so how much storage for my thumb drive