While you're not wrong with the first part, my problem with the bolded is that I can very easily see this leading to total removal/erasure of these older works in the near future.
"You've already admitted this is wrong, so why are we even showing it at all?"
In a world where
this is happening right now, you can't really write stuff like this off as a fallacious slippery slope anymore.
Please take the last sentence of my post into account. I will let this stand and not niggle about it but the last sentence was the important bit.
Without crying about it, my family has a lot of reasons to be bitter in a historical sense, as a lot of families/people are. But their bitterness isn't mine, their anguish at past occurences is nothing pertaining to the life I lead in this day and age.
I see their lives in retrospect and I am objective about it. I might not have given you a reason for it but you can use big words on me, 'slippery slope' isn't going to cut it if you were going for non-broad terms, please be more specific, where
Look at me, not being able to read your post correctly.
The bold quote is an admittance and the whole disclaimer is a lot more broad, go a few posts back and you will see the picture. They are saying the exact opposite of what you are posing. It's wholesome, really.