Unfortunately that advertising didn't work with people paying for xbox live trying to justify how PSN was a second rate service (even though it had dedicated servers for first party games) and how they would happily pay for XLG. Unfortunately people normalised this.Paid? It's free with Playstation®Plus
Remember when Sony was in an underdog position and did not charge for MP during the early days of the PS360 era? Even made a point of using it in ads.
Seemingly memory holed off the internets today, with only an old 2008 Destructoid article remaining.
Is the game free to play? If not, then this is a non issue and what every game does.
If it's free to play, then it needing Plus would be something worth noting.
like every multiplayer game on playstation? what makes this unique?
I honestly dont know what the point of this thread is....lol.
It's like this on all 3 consoles on non F2P games.
I wonder if anyone at Sony realizes that people like us are literally not buying some games due to their insane cost of going online ($95/year here). I have skipped several games that I would have bought otherwise.I'm sick of online multiplayer games and having to pay to play them online on consoles. Gonna pass on this.
I wonder if anyone at Sony realizes that people like us are literally not buying some games due to their insane cost of going online ($95/year here). I have skipped several games that I would have bought otherwise.
Did anyone expect anything different? Am I missing something here
I wonder if anyone at Sony realizes that people like us are literally not buying some games due to their insane cost of going online ($95/year here). I have skipped several games that I would have bought otherwise.
The PS4 launched with F2P games not needing Plus. Even with the success of the PS4 and PS5 Sony kept F2P games not needing Plus.Paid? It's free with Playstation®Plus
Remember when Sony was in an underdog position and did not charge for MP during the early days of the PS360 era? Even made a point of using it in ads.
Seemingly memory holed off the internets today, with only an old 2008 Destructoid article remaining.
Did anyone expect anything different? Am I missing something here
Some people had this unrealistic expectation that Sony would make their own GAA playable without Ps+ because they are first/second party and they are launching day 1 on PC (where multiplayer is free).
Which was always silly, they aren't going to significantly raise the price of Ps+ and then start giving you options NOT to subscribe lol.
They are, but they've decided that the money they get from all the people that do subscribe is probably way more than the extra sales they'd get from making multiplayer free.
They have almost 50 million subscribers paying $60/year (soon $80), that's several billions a year for very little effort.
The counter argument from console fee supporters is that:
- The fees pay for the server infrastructure
- The fees can keep the games going online
- Each console network has their own all-in-one kind of service.... games, profile, friends list, movie/NF apps, achievement/trophy pts
Don't be an idiot.
There are no console fee supporters. There used to be on the 360 when online was free on PS3. But the moment Sony started charging for online on PS4, all masks fell off and everyone collectively accepted the fact that paid online is shit but there's nothing we can do about it.
There isn't a single reasonable gamer who would not agree with Sony and MS dropping paid online. Clearly, MS and Sony won't, so as long as the fee isn't unreasonable, we'll continue to pay it because we're held hostage by the platform owners. An online fee isn't a sufficient reason alone to switch to PC.
Probably because when people hear GAAS, they right away think about the F2P ones. And not paid ones like FIFA and COD. But for H2 I think a bunch of people thought it would be free because it's more of an indie budget game. How many people even bought H1 at $20? I dont think too many or else you would had heard about giant sales amounts. So if the franchise isnt a big seller and this game is PS5 and PC, why not try for F2P get tons of users and make the money on the back end mtx fees?Some people had this unrealistic expectation that Sony would make their own GAA playable without Ps+ because they are first/second party and they are launching day 1 on PC (where multiplayer is free).
Which was always silly, they aren't going to significantly raise the price of Ps+ and then start giving you options NOT to subscribe lol.
It'll be interesting what the price is because H1 launched way back for $20. But since then, the price is stable at $20, but the game is upgraded to deluxe editions by default.Imagine it will probably also be 20 Euro more expensive on Playstation 5 while sony has to give 30% on steam to valve. Do people really think this isnta bad look.
It'll be interesting what the price is because H1 launched way back for $20. But since then, the price is stable at $20, but the game is upgraded to deluxe editions by default.
So either H1 goes down to $10 and H2 is $20. Or H1 stays at $20 and H2 is $30 or $40. We'll see.
One thing about Sony this gen is they arent afraid to launch for high prices unless they get major pushback. Destruction All Stars was originally at $70 game. And then got chopped. Returnal is not a full budget game but that sold for full price.H2 was definitively more expensive to make. I expect it to be fullprice at 80 euro while 60 euro on pc.
Remember Games for Windows Live?Did you expect Sony to try to charge a sub to play this one game on PC?
Well I dont know over the span of 8 years thats 640 euro on top of 550 euro console and more expensive games. Its more convenient to play on console but it sure as hell the only remaining benefit.
Exactly. Lots of people in this thread are acting like it can't even be questioned, just because it has become the "norm" and that's troubling.I used to use PS+ for the monthly games + the game library for extra when they introduced that. But the increase has made it just not worth the price, so I have cancelled. I use my playstation for almost exclusively single player games, or... hybrid online like Elden Ring or downloading car paint jobs on GT7. But I play online exclusively on PC largely down to the superior input of keyboard + mouse.
Worst there's no good reason multiplayer should not just be free, its only because companies can force you to pay within the walled Gardens they have built.
Amen to that. Most people dont focus on anything in life.Nobody consciously factors this into their highest priority considerations on platform choice. Ganers are focused mainly on their most immediate concerns, not costs over the next 8 years. They aren't corporate accountants.
Nobody consciously factors this into their highest priority considerations on platform choice. Ganers are focused mainly on their most immediate concerns, not costs over the next 8 years. They aren't corporate accountants.
It's still blows my mind console kiddies are 100% okay with paying these multi billion dollar companies to play multiplayer on top of paying internet bills
You say that but PC gaming can be more expensive overall due to the higher cost of building a gaming capable PC.
Don't you think it's weird that ps gamers lose exclusive access while paying significantly more for worse game. The only good way around is make every sony gaas game f2p. It's especially shitty after a 30% increase for the literally the same service. Its a really bad look.
Paid? It's free with Playstation®Plus
Remember when Sony was in an underdog position and did not charge for MP during the early days of the PS360 era? Even made a point of using it in ads.
Seemingly memory holed off the internets today, with only an old 2008 Destructoid article remaining.
Is it tho? How many people have all consoles+all subs+higher game costs. Longterm is more expensive expect when you only play like 1 or 2 games a year.
Do you think? Well I think its financially responsible to pay attention to longterm costs to effectively use your bought product but maybe that's just me..
It's still blows my mind console kiddies are 100% okay with paying these multi billion dollar companies to play multiplayer on top of paying internet bills
You can play Fortnite without Playstation plus. Not sure about other F2P gameslike every multiplayer game on playstation? what makes this unique?
I said can be, not is always. But I bet if often is.
huh? thats not the same comparison. fornite is free. this game is not. you buy the game and like every game you have to buy, if it has multiplayer you need ps plusYou can play Fortnite without Playstation plus. Not sure about other F2P games